What are your ideas, that if you could implement would likely stop our species from warring so much?

I’m asking for a reasonable ones, but if not - at least make them funny :P

    • Hangry @lm.helilot.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with genetics engineering as the answer.
      Our DNA has greed, power tripping, paranoia etc. hard coded somewhere. The correct combinations might stop all wars.
      But all in all, wouldn’t it make humanity dull and unsatisfied? I wonder.

      • eatthecake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if we genetically engineered ourselves to make beans taste like lasagna and kindness feel as satisfying as getting a promotion?

        • Hangry @lm.helilot.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d argue that humanity is humanity and we wouldn’t remove its complex emotions, philosophical wonders and existential dread.
          Desire for more out of life, search of meaning, etc.
          Unless we go all the way and engineer ever flowing euphoria from birth to death, for everyone. But then, what’s even the point?

        • Hangry @lm.helilot.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Eugenics is often conflated with “selective breeding”, which is pretty justified, given all the derives from the twentieth century.
          Today, whether we should include CRISPR and so under the umbrella of eugenics is still open for debate.
          The term of Transhumanism may be more relevant in this specific topic, as for Wikipedia’s definition,

          Transhumanism is a philosophical and intellectual movement which advocates the enhancement of the human condition by developing and making widely available sophisticated technologies that can greatly enhance longevity and cognition.

          On a personal note I think that all in all, defining what are the " good genes to add, remove, or keep" in the human pool is definitely a delicate matter, 100% biased by our cultural differences and steps fully in the endless philosophical field.