• olutukko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not locking behind terminal. It’s just not implementing gui. Which is completely valid since that takes time and effort

        • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Also, writing a GUI wrapper for a terminal-only program is much easier than writing a terminal wrapper for a GUI-only program.

            • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              What do you mean by “CTA”? How don’t see how “Call to Action” is relevant in this context, seeing how it’s more of a UX design concern than a technical thing. Or does it have some other meaning that does not appear in Google’s first page of results and that ChatGPT is not aware of, and yet “Anyone worth any kind of respect” already implements?

      • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        People are free to write a GUI for it, assuming it’s free software. And you are free to not use a terminal and use any GUI alternatives.

        I mean, locking things behind a GUI definitely isn’t freedom. GUIs are very limited compared to most terminal interfaces.

        • voxel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          it’s just very hard to make a usable ui, and extremely easy to make a great cli interface

          • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Oh ok. I guess we have a different definition of what “locked” means. One could definitely make a GUI for simple commands. Who knows, maybe some students somewhere already have.