ElCanut@jlai.lu to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 11 months agoWhat an ideajlai.luimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1477
arrow-up1477imageWhat an ideajlai.luElCanut@jlai.lu to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareKushan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·11 months agoAr least the conclusion of the article was basically “a third world war would be bad for investors”, so it wasn’t wrong there.
minus-squareSkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·11 months agoLooks like someone needs to read the 34th rule of acquisition again. War is good for business
minus-squareAngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-211 months ago35th rule of acquisition -Peace is good for business. 72nd rule of acquisition -When dealing with the poor, housing, medicine, and education, are not bargaining chips. One cannot get latinum from a gree worm
minus-squarerambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoFor more information search up “Star Trek Ferengi Rule 34”
minus-squareRozaŭtunolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·11 months agoKilling each other is bad for the economy? Who would’ve thought!
minus-squareTonyTonyChopper@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·11 months agoactually war has always been good for the economy unless you’re the country getting bombed
Ar least the conclusion of the article was basically “a third world war would be bad for investors”, so it wasn’t wrong there.
Looks like someone needs to read the 34th rule of acquisition again.
35th rule of acquisition
-Peace is good for business.
72nd rule of acquisition
-When dealing with the poor, housing, medicine, and education, are not bargaining chips. One cannot get latinum from a gree worm
For more information search up “Star Trek Ferengi Rule 34”
Killing each other is bad for the economy? Who would’ve thought!
actually war has always been good for the economy unless you’re the country getting bombed