• aidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The mix is that the control is mixed, for example through regulation but private ownership. As well as some production is fully state run. Socialism is generally understood to not be exclusively worker control, but include other forms of collective control- such as state control.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Socialism is generally understood to not be exclusively worker control, but include other forms of collective control- such as state control.

      Generally understood by whom? If your understanding of socialism means state control it probably means your ideas of it doesn’t have much coherence at all.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My understanding of socialism is that it describes collective control of the means of production, collective control can take many forms, including state control

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Control by a bunch of party bureaucrats and apparatchiks who, like their counter-parts in corporate capitalist countries, are only interested in maintaining and expanding their own power and privilege in no way constitutes anything that can be called “collective” with a straight face - period.

          The term “socialism” has a very hard and uncompromising meaning - it becomes utterly meaningless when it becomes whatever “Dear Brother Comrade Leader” says it is.