Kelly Roskam of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions discusses a Supreme Court case that will decide if a federal law prohibiting possession of firearms by people subject to domestic violence protection orders is constitutional

  • @IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18 months ago

    I’m not sure what relevance your previous post has to this topic.

    Anyway, rights are not people, people are more important. As for the right to own a firearm, I’m of the opinion that it’s past time to revisit this amendment. People living in countries without something similar to the 2nd amendment aren’t less free. In fact I’d argue they’re more free as they don’t have to worry about being involved in a massacre just because some white male incel fuckup is having a bad day.

    As for your point about protective orders. Did you read the article? The rationale is discussed there.

    • Jeremy [Iowa]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      In fact I’d argue they’re more free as they don’t have to worry about being involved in a massacre just because some white male incel fuckup is having a bad day.

      Fortunately, the only reason to have such fear is media sensationalism and your personal failure to understand the statistics.

      Despite the fearmongering, you’re still not even close to likely to experience one.

      • @IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        By going from revisiting the 2nd amendment straight to Chinese totalitarianism you’re showing a complete lack of nuance and critical thinking which makes your opinion less than interesting to me.

        There are plenty of countries which exercise gun control and they’re not any less free than the US. Many are more tolerant, more progressive and their societies are fairer and more equatable for everyone.