Pope Francis made his strongest statements yet about climate change Wednesday, rebuking fossil fuel companies and urging countries to make an immediate transition to renewable energy.

In a new document titled “Laudate Deum,” or “Praise God,” the pope criticizes oil and gas companies for greenwashing new fossil fuel projects and calls for more ambitious efforts in the West to tackle the climate crisis. In the landmark apostolic exhortation, a form of papal writing, Francis says that “avoiding an increase of a tenth of a degree in the global temperature would already suffice to alleviate some suffering for many people.”

“Laudate Deum” is a follow-up to the pope’s 2015 encyclical on climate change, known as “Laudato Si’,” which lamented the exploitation of the planet and cast the protection of the environment as a moral imperative. When it was released, “Laudato Si’” was viewed as an extraordinary move by the head of the Catholic Church to address global warming and its consequences.

Nearly a decade later, the pope’s message has taken on new urgency.

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    15% of the world’s population is ~1.3b people. You don’t need to quote the same stats back at me.

    Where did I say anything about SA not being important? Equally, why fixate on SA if the pope has influenced so much politically in the rest of the world?

    Also we’re talking about Catholicism and the Pope, not other major religions. Stop moving the goalposts.

    I’m still waiting for the answer to my question.

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stop moving goalposts

      You say as they address your issue and name several Catholic majority countries where the opinions of the pope sway politics far more than you’re accepting.

      You’re the one moving goalposts on them lol

        • angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, abortion ban in Poland. Also the fight against lgbt in Poland - which is one reason why this news is really interesting. It can cause a divide among catholics, which can be desirable.

          • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I appreciate you coming back with an answer, thank you.

            I don’t understand how the Pope directly influenced the abortion ban though - what actions did he take to influence it directly?

            • angrystego@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not saying he influences politics directly, I’m saying he influences the way the vast population of worldwide catholics think. So the influence is indirect but major.

              In case of Poland, I think the government feels like it’s safe to go with such a radical policy because they know most of the population obliges the will of the church, which is anti-choice. The same goes for the lgbt discrimination. I think now that the pope started speaking a bit lgbt friendlier, the public opinion might start to be more divided, which will hopefully mean the topic will be less of a safe bet for populists.

              Let me add that I too appreciate you discussing with me peacefully, I’m actually having quite a nice time, which is a rare experience when it comes to online politics.

              • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think we kind of agree and disagree. I think it’s good that he can add influence where there is pliability in Catholics, as in Poland.

                I still don’t see his reach or influence being as big as say affecting meaningful and wide reaching political decisions in USA or Chinese politics though.

                • angrystego@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, I agree with you that he doesn’t have much influence on Chinese and USA politics, and I can see now that we both recognize there are many other places in the world that can be influenced by him significantly. We’ve actually reached a meaningful conclusion. This is what I imagine a civilised discussion between two reasonable people to be like. Thank you for this positive experience.