California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

  • Liz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve seen video of a small lady with a handgun chasing out four home intruders while taking wild, panicked shots. Yes, these guys ran, but not everyone will. Two and a half shots per intruder doesn’t sound like a fun time.

      • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interestingly enough, the lady doesn’t seem to have died in her sleep - that a firearm did, indeed, stop that invasion. Weird, that.

        I’m interested in seeing your sources comparing frequency of defensive use of firearms to frequency of firearm suicides. When making such a bold assertion, surely you’ve got actual data and aren’t just talking out of your ass… right?

        Right?

          • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did you know that owning a car makes you exponentially more likely to die in a car accident?

          • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I see you didn’t respond to what was stated. As a reminder:

            I’m interested in seeing your sources comparing frequency of defensive use of firearms to frequency of firearm suicides. When making such a bold assertion, surely you’ve got actual data and aren’t just talking out of your ass… right?

            Right?

            This, even before your additional questionable conclusion from what is clearly an source so unbiased you cannot taint its unbiasedness by… actually showing support for your position.

            I’ll consider your criticism regarding math when you’ve polished up those reading skills.

          • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which is perfectly fitting in response to an absurd, reductionist generalization.

            You seem to be rather one-sided in your application of criticism.