• inge@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    a huge chunk, most likely the vast majority, of Electron apps […] are just wrapped web sites

    [citation needed]

      • BlueBockser@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If the question was “how many repositories on GitHub mention the word electron”, your answer would be correct. As it stands, citation is still very much needed.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the question was “how many repositories on GitHub mention the word electron”, your answer would be correct. As it stands, citation is still very much needed.

          That is a valid citation. You can count yourself how many of those repositories are just for wrapping specific websites by random people. If you think I’m wrong, put your money where your mouth is and provide a citation yourself.

          • BlueBockser@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The cited source does not prove your point, so it is not a valid source. If you make a statement, you go prove it. Until you do, I’m gonna assume it to be false.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The cited source does not prove your point, so it is not a valid source.

              Your laziness to count repos is not my fault. 🤷

              If you make a statement, you go prove it. Until you do, I’m gonna assume it to be false.

              OK, then I’m continuing to assume your statements are false because you can’t even be bothered to provide a citation why mine is not valid. Bye then.