“Google is constantly optimizing and tweaking its apps through various A/B tests, and the latest one for the Play Store has us scratching our heads quite a bit. We’ve noticed that the familiar and handy install button is disappearing for some in the Play Store’s search results, which means that you actually have to tap through to the full app listing to install an app. This behavior isn’t in place for all results and apps, though, making the tweak feel arbitrary and random…”

  • randomaccount43543@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google’s constant A/B testing is really tiring and confusing. One day a feature is there, next day it’s nowhere to be found

    • otacon239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      For about a month, my Google Hone app swapped between a new interface and the old one about once every couple days. I was never sure what I was going to get.

      • Kichae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of all companies out there, I’d expect Google to be able to run an a/b test right. You don’t learn anything of value by constantly pulling the rug out from underneath people.

        • ares35@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          they probably are doing it ‘right’, at least by their own definition. a/b testing for a company like google is more about what generates the most revenue, not what pleases the product… err, users… most.

          • Kichae@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even still, without a consistent experience over a reasonable amount of time, all you’re really monitoring is novelty or discombobulation. You’re not learning which interface generates more money.

            This only makes sense if discombobulation makes the most money.

          • ijeff@lemdro.idOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I personally dislike that the notifications icon in the Play Store app shows me ads instead of app updates.

    • ElPussyKangaroo@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with this kind of testing is that they do not ask you whether or not you want to be a part of this particular form of testing, and by default opt you into it.

      • And009@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a need for this kind of testing to be uninformed and unbiased. I think better implementation would be to stay consistent and have a longer span of data collection instead of changing it under a week…

        • ElPussyKangaroo@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then suggest it. Ask the user if they want to test it.

          It’s not like the average user, after finding an issue, is gonna go and review it on the Play Store. More often than not, they will just be pissed off that it changes so often.

          My grandmother HATES the new Phone Call chip. She liked the bubble, and I agree. And the number of times Google has pushed the update and rolled it back for her and everyone else in my family is extremely annoying.

          I like to beta test apps. They don’t give a fuck.

          And Google has the beta testing opt in feature in the Play Store. It’s ALREADY A FEATURE! Why would you not respect your own rules?? Wtf Google?!

        • Kichae@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The experiment isn’t really valid with optgin data, but that doesn’t mean there’s a need for it. That’s entirely contingent on whether the experiment is needed at all, and most of the time these things are about squeezing one last drop of blood out of a dead corpse. And I’d argue that that’s not something that’s needed.

          • And009@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Few corporations will do that, real purpose is to understand user behaviour and test which flow is the fastest and easiest to understand for users .