[TW: Mentions of sexual dimorphism in animals. TWed just in case]

Most animals are sexually dimorphic, which means male and female individuals are different from each other beyond their bottoms. But for some animals, the differences are even more starking than humans.

For example, the different feather colors between male and female mallards. Male mallards have green heads while female mallards are mostly brown.

Other animals takes it further. Such as how all workers of a eusocial insect (ants, bees, and wasps) colonies are female and the males are just drones. There are many other examples in the wild.

When we turn these animals into anthros, we tend to keep their dimorphism, at least most of the obvious ones like how anthro deers have antlers, male anthro lions have manes, etc.


Now imagine if these anthros were transgender, how would it work out? How would they transition?

For example, how would transgendeers deal with their antlers? Would they wear fake antlers (for FtM deers) or cut their antlers (for MtF deers)? And what about anthro animals where the male and the female individuals have different fur/feather patterns? Would they have to paint their fur?

I suppose hormone could play a part in dimorphism even for animals, so much like humans, HRT may exist for anthros. But how would they work and what’s the effect for anthros, especially for non mammals like insects, avians, and fish sonas?

But aside from that. I think the biggest hurdle would be size differences. Many male animals are larger than their female counterparts, sometimes as far as being twice their size. That could be a problem even worse than height dysphoria.


Of course, all of this can be hand-waived. Just like how anthro bears and anthro rabbits are often drawn the same size despite being a bear and a rabbit, we could also make male anthros and female anthros the same general size.

Besides, most animals don’t have visible tops, yet most female anthros do.

But, I think this is an interesting topic to think about.

  • FlowerTreeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    211 months ago

    That’s interesting. Though, I wonder how it would play out for other Pokemons, especially Nidoran and its evolutions (nidoking and nidoqueen). How would a non-binary version of them play out?

    • stgiga
      link
      English
      111 months ago

      I would imagine that nonbinary versions of the Nidoran family would be somewhat in-between both canon sides, yet also deviating significantly from either, while also having SOME elements of both. Also, the symbol in the species name for such a Nidoran would be 🜬 (Unicode character for Sublimate of Antimony, which was repurposed by the nonbinary community as a gender symbol for nonbinary.)

      Also, Pokemon has some interesting things regarding gender: Firstly, there are trans Pokemon. In some older gens, Azurill has a different gender ratio than its evolutions. This manifests in those games as a female Azurill turning into a male Marill after evolution. Also in Sword and Shield, there is a glitch in which a male Salandit can evolve into a female Salazzle. Salandits normally can ONLY evolve into a Salazzle if they are female. So, in Pokemon, there are examples of unintentional transfem and transmasc Pokemon.

      On the topic of Pokemon gender glitches: It turns out that various glitch Pokemon have gender ratios that do not match those of any conventional Pokemon. Now, those glitches don’t produce nonbinary Pokemon. Those require a Gender Code of 0xFF. If I had to pick a nonbinary Pokemon, I think that the best example would be Mew.