When do we get the next one?

  • ebikefolder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ASAP? Take a look at planning and construction times of nuclear plants. Like Hinkley Point C in the UK for instance. Announced in 2010, generation now postponed to 2026, years behind schedule and billions over budget. And that’s on an already pre-existing nuclear site.

    Cost? Estimated 100 GBP/MWh. The difference to market prices will probably be coughed up by the taxpayer.

    Renewables are way faster to install, for a fraction of the cost.

    • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They should have started sooner and with more plants. But it’s still much better for that nuclear plant be complete in 2030, than never. Delays and mismanagement aren’t unique to nuclear, and no excuse to stop from building it.

      >Renewables are way faster to install, for a fraction of the cost.

      So why are we still using fossil fuels then? The best time to start building alternatives is yesterday. Second best time is now.

      • ebikefolder@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So why are we still using fossil fuels then?

        You already gave the answer: Because they should have started sooner.

        • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So that’s all I’m saying. Let’s do all in our power to get rid of carbon emissions ASAP. The fact that it takes time is no excuse not to start.