“Patriarchy” is a floating signifier. It has no clear meaning. Indeed, it means whatever is convenient for it to mean in any given context. “Patriarchy” is furthermore a thought-terminating cliche. Instead of carefully thought out social analysis the Patriarchy is deployed as a non-explanation.

The Patriarchy is a useful non-concept for feminists to deploy to avoid ever holding any individual woman accountable. It’s not her fault she’s enforcing traditional male gender roles, it’s the Patriarchy. She couldn’t possibly be the abuser in the relationship, and even if she was it’s not really her fault it’s the Patriarchy. Don’t be angry at mothers who have their baby boys’ foreskins removed without anesthetic, it’s the Patriarchy.

The Patriarchy is a parody of class analysis. In this regard it is like, nay is, a conspiracy theory. Instead of naming an exhaustively analyzed and theorized capitalism, conspiracy theories decry a shadowy, conniving, amorphous Other. Conspiracy theory and Patriarchy theory inculcate paranoia and fear of this Other but offers no constructive response to combat the evil it describes. Patriarchy theory groups all men as the oppressor and all women as the oppressed. It thus resists intersectionality by smoothing over the many cases where a woman has power over a man or boy.

Patriarchy theory is false consciousness. It’s not even a particularly useful tool for analyzing women’s issues, let alone men’s issues.

      • @luciole@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        1611 months ago

        Seriously though, I hope this post gets taken down. This is a small community, downvotes don’t bury anything. It’s typical Petersonian propaganda that tries to argue against what is stated in the sidebar by flaunting abstract wordings, accusatory misogyny and straw men. If this stays up I’m so out.

        • @spaduf
          link
          311 months ago

          Don’t forget to report. I don’t think the moderators watch super closely since this is still a super small community.

          • Ms. SourCreamAndGarlic
            link
            fedilink
            English
            411 months ago

            The only moderator of this community hasn’t been active in over a month. We’ve put up a Moderators Wanted post for that reason.

            • @spaduf
              link
              English
              211 months ago

              I thought that too originally but then I saw activity in the modlog. Any idea why those moderators aren’t listed in the sidebar?

              • Ms. SourCreamAndGarlic
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                If a moderator isn’t listed it’s an Admin action. We removed a few posts that violated the community rules while we were waiting for the community owner/moderator to get back to us.

        • rikersbeardOP
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          I fail to see what I have in common with Jordan Peterson beyond a passing interest in Jung. I support trans rights, and indeed equal rights for all.

          abstract wordings

          Did you read my post? The entire point I’m making is that “Patriarchy” is “abstract wording”

          accusatory misogyny

          Care to point out what exactly I wrote was misogynistic?

          straw men

          You’re the one throwing out strawmen by calling me a misogynist, Petersonian.

    • rikersbeardOP
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      Altho I myself am an egalitarian and therefore antifeminist, many of the points I made above are not inherently antifeminist. Before Patriarchy theory’s ascendency in the Fourth Wave, it was contested amongst feminist theorists. It was feminists themselves who first pointed out how incoherent, self-contradictory, and wholly unsuited to its purpose Patriarchy theory is.

      • @Lanthanae
        link
        111 months ago

        I think you’re misunderstanding what “Patriarchy” and “Feminism” are, among other things.

        At the very least, you’re not using those words in the same way that academic literature on the subject does, the way people generally talk about it, and the way we use them on this sub. It would be more helpful for communication if you expressed your ideas as they are rather than using vocabulary that it seems we’re not agreeing on, because it’s just causing confusion.