From David Sirota’s The Lever

  • snooggums@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Supermarkets would be replaced with multiple markets in walking distance after removing the zoning that excludes retail from being within walking distance of residential areas.

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No one is building shit within walking distance of nowhere. There’s less than 200 people within 20 miles of me, and I’ve moved to a more crowded area. No market is going to fix that. The nearest zoning law is probably a hundred miles away. And supermarkets didn’t defeat small stores because of zoning, it’s because economies of scale are more efficient.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In rural areas where population is the issue and not zoning, that is true.

        In any city with 10 thousand residents or more it tends to be the zoning that keeps stores from opening up in the suburbs and other new development. There they tend to go big becsuse they are far enough away that they might as well be big enough to draw from as far away as possible.

        Most people live in the latter areas and that is what is being discussed.

        • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re talking about replacing cars with public transportation which is fucking ridiculous for the majority of the country due to low population density and large distances. There’s no amount of zoning changes that are going to fix that. Also, creating walkable cities is a great goal, with zero chance of happening in the US. It would be asking home owners and businesses to throw away existing investments, or forcing them to. Guess how well either of those options is going to go over. Especially in an aging populace with nothing but investment income.