- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
potatar@sh.itjust.worksto News@lemmy.world•Chess grandmaster Magnus Carlsen rejoins tournament he quit over wearing jeans - after dress code change3·6 months agoSo naked is fine too? Or should there be SOME arbitrary lines?
potatar@sh.itjust.worksto Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml•Ideology gap increase between young men and women in various countries.1·9 months agoHopefully, in the distant future (as t -> inf), we will all become conservatives. Not out of resistance to change, but because we did so well: We have progressed to such an optimal point that any further step (progress) would lead to something worse. Maybe the trends reflect this?
potatar@sh.itjust.worksto Fuck AI@lemmy.world•Lots of negativity towards AI lately, but consider:4·10 months agoAh! I thought you guys wanted cheap, fast, and most importantly interpretable cell state determination from single cell sequencing data. My bad.
potatar@sh.itjust.worksto Skeptic@lemmy.world•Genetically modified crops aren't a solution to climate change, despite what the biotech industry saysEnglish9·2 years agoIt isn’t THE solution, it is A solution. The title is wrong.
potatar@sh.itjust.workstoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Capitalism is killing our planetEnglish23·2 years agoPut a high upper limit only. Don’t touch the bottomline.
For example, no more than 4 cars per person: Average Joe won’t even know this rule exists but it will still reduce mineral mining due to people who collect cars.
Possible problems with my shitty example: Now a car is a controlled substance. Who decides the limit and how? What if there is a mental disease (with a better example this would make more sense) which requires a person to have 20 cars?
potatar@sh.itjust.worksto Europe@feddit.de•German court bans LinkedIn from ignoring "Do Not Track" signalsEnglish7·2 years ago“Germany bans this already illegal thing”… So they double banned it?
Talk about it then, instead of complaining about reddit (same goes for me… but i have nothing smart to add)