• 10 Posts
  • 142 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 2nd, 2024

help-circle



  • jh29atoich_iel@feddit.orgich🫥iel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Meine Meinung: Wenn ich höre, dass es 32.6 mal so warscheinlich ist, an einem Raser als an einem Attentäter zu sterben, bekomme ich das Gefühl dass mir das Angst vor Autos machen müsste. Die Verfickte AfD hat bloß gemerkt, dass mehr leute Auto fahren, als wichtige Beziehungen mit Ausländern haben, sodass mehr Leute wie ich aus “Kognitive Dissonanz”-Gründen ihre Angst vor Autos unter den Teppich kehren, als das bei Ausländern machen.

    Die vage Definition vom “gefährlichen Ausländer” laut AfD trägt vielleicht auch zum Problem bei, genauso wie die überrepräsentation des Themas in den Medien. Ich finde übrigends oberflächlich, dass Rasertote ein gutes Beispiel für etwas sind, wo das Resultat für die Angehörigen ähnlich einem Attentat wird, und alles was noch fehlt, ist eine öffentliche Angstkampagne gegen das Auto. (Not Just Bikes fängt ja schon damit an (25% Sarkasmus))


  • I must be in the minority because I post so rarely that I don’t sign up when I ‘join’ the platform, I sign up when I want to post something. When I first wanted to post something, I just joined the instance it was going to be on. (Also because it’s queer, which I don’t tell you about for consistency). I also don’t care that much about not seeing what my instance has defederated. Or actually, not being able to comment on it, because I actually go on programming.dev sometimes, without having an account there. I don’t really get it. The fact that my Instance technically requires an application might actually be a UX hurdle, but otherwise, you just click Sign Up, enter email, name, and password, and that’s it, right? It could be a UX problem that you miss out on content you don’t see, but you also already see a load of content that you’re not going to miss out on. Tutorials on how x-instance moving works might be cool though, if they don’t already exist. Making them more visible might limit the defederation FOMO.


  • jh29atoich_iel@feddit.orgich🤍✊🏻iel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    diesen “Network State” reverse-propagandabegriff kann man voll schlecht im internet suchen. In dem Post nehmen die so halb an, das man weiß was das ist, während die anderen zusammenfassungen des Begriffs immer nur leicht utopisch klingen. Es ist ja nicht tatsächlich “eine online Community mit einigen Werten, die sich durch ihre eigenen Regelungen, Kryptowährungen, und Besitztümer ausdrückt”. Zählt das, wenn man die Regeln seiner Social Platform ändert um seine meinung hervorzuheben? Ist gemeint, dass der tech-Regierungs-Komplex der USA plant die Regierung durch irgendwas mit privatfirmen und Krypto zu ersetzen? (bei dem weg: ist das Haarspalterei, diese unterscheidung bei einer Trump-Regierung überhaupt zu untersuchen?)



  • I’m so sorry that some people in this thread have much worse nightmares than I have. I don’t recall having any nightmares that you might call visually grotesque.

    When I was in High School, I apparently discovered that looking at a person signals interest in the person, and that it’s possible to look at something in this way on accident, or at least without conscious planning. From this I concluded into a mild obsession to basically be conscious of what I am looking at at almost every point in time. In hindsight, it feels kind of like the “you are now breathing manually” meme. This basically only happened with two people, along with it slightly reinforcing my bias against looking at girls, because I’m probably gay anyway, let them not get any ideas.* (this thought is completely stupid in any other way than being moderately considerate. it probably didn’t do anything anyway, because I’m not very socially active and had approximately 1-2 friends.)

    • The girl who sat on the mirror-opposite side of the room from me in math class, which, If I didn’t change seats on purpose, which I did when possible, basically put her in the center of my default field of view when not looking at the teacher. (Seating and desk arrangements in my country are very exciting.) She was really good at staring back, which is basically why I noticed that people care when they’re being looked at. I don’t really know whether she did this on purpose. I had nothing in common with her that would count as knowing her personally, but we did look pretty similar, so much that some people just told me this without being asked. She’s the only person wearing a tie on one of the photos from graduation. I didn’t feel a legitimate reason to care much, but basically, I cared because of how much I was constantly thinking about not looking at her. To my friend, I expressed myself as being kind of scared of her, though I never really said that I was scared that anyone capable of critisizing me would find out how much space this bullshit took up in my mind sometimes, or misrepresent this as being attracted or something. I also remember believing at some point that she was behind me on my way to school, (in some parts of europe, people bike to school,) as well as just actually seeing her on some paths beyond doubt, and thinking a moderate amount about what path she takes the least, which might just have been all of them, because of how rarely I saw her on the way.
    • The other guy isn’t really at fault or anything. He’s still really nice to be with now that I’ve gotten over this somewhat, though I see him rarely, which probably contributed to the brainworms spreading.

    *(I cultivate an off-internet bonus genre of brainworms where being asexual reinforces my faux-antiquated fear of being perceived as attracted to someone, which may or may not make sense)














  • jh29ato196Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t even know which way the split would go. Many people i know studying computer science first year have a macbook, in what seems disproportionate. Maybe just general university student bias? also apple walled garden* lol *on the iPhone



  • I like the Onion’s cartoons, but they’re also often confusing. At least for this one, I get what it’s trying to say, though the meta-ironic huge labels, extremely bad puns, (in this case also a rather incoherent speech bubble from the dad) make this a fun experience too. But other cartoons like https://theonion.com/stars-and-strips/ also have meaning that I don’t get, or the godfather references or whatever. maybe others appreciate this complexity better. Is it because I’m too young, do they put references to old media often? The Godfather is from 1972. Also, do you think they’re doing this big literalness in the dialogue and the huge labels just to make fun of cartoons and how they influence what you think about the characters? Or is there some trend in other cartoons, where some Cartoons are seen as special for being very literal?