• Lyre@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    8 months ago

    I dont really understand this. Does tiktok have a group call feature now? Or are they equating short form videos of strangers to “hanging out”?

    • Pyro@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah I would consider Discord as more of a space people can “hang out” in.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        8 months ago

        I use discord but I didn’t realize how much others used it till I got new roommates. They basically have it perpetually open on the side, a perpetual portal to their friend network

        • Pyro@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It’s one of the easiest ways of calling and texting friends without exposing your phone number.

          I rarely open discord on my PC, but I have it as an app on my phone which is always connected.

        • CptEnder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah I open discord every morning before I open slack for work. I manage two 2k+ communities and am an active member of dozens of other niche communities… Two of which involves members meeting up regularly IRL. It’s the best tool for direct social engagement on the Internet.

    • puchaczyk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      8 months ago

      I wonder how much of the internet outrage about the bill is just astroturfing by tiktok.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Here… On Lemmy?

          Fuck Tik Tok, ban all social media for all I care, the internet was much better with old forums and IRC.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            8 months ago

            ban all social media for all I care

            Exactly. My problem with the bill isn’t banning Tiktok. It’s that it doesn’t go nearly far enough. Make all social media companies turn off algorithms in their feed, or make them make those algorithms open source so we can see how they’re manipulating us.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              As far as I understand it’s the media’s portrayal of the bill that’s wrong, it’s not aimed at TT directly but puts rules in place that TT can’t respect as long as it’s owned by a Chinese company.

              Correct me if I’m wrong, that’s what they were saying in Canadian media.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Sure, but it’s broader than that, any social media platform with ties to enemy countries could be banned.

              • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                No, that’s totally correct and what most media outlets are saying. It’s the memes that are calling it a ban.

                However, my problem is that any platform has this level of influence, not just that it’s under Chinese influence.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Probably not, but this meme didn’t originate here. It was put here by someone who either legitimately agreed with it or just wanted content to post, but that doesn’t mean the original was legitimate.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I wonder how much of the internet support for the bill is just astroturfing by facebook/twitter/insta.

      • CptEnder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bingo. That and people upset about losing money but honestly if it’s gone for everyone the market will fill the void on Instagram. See: Reddit vs Lemmy

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s less about hanging out and more about occupying the time I guess. Teens hang out in a third space being social because it burns free time and releases dopamine. When you can achieve that by sitting in your room, getting dopamine by watching tiktok and sending them to your friends wordlessly, the need for the third space drops

      I kind of get what the Twitter post was trying to get at its just written poorly. Anything that’s not them participating in the economy is considered bad.

  • gullible@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Are kids disallowed from hanging out in parks, school clubs, or others’ homes now? What’s changed?

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nothing, it’s a ridiculous argument as a rationalization for arguing against the tiktok ban. I’ve seen a number of posts today trying to paint it as some attach on democracy or youth culture. The fact is that tiktok captures a giant amount of data and is directly accessible by a hostile foreign government. The ban makes sense.

      • pop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        The ban makes sense because companies in the US tried and failed horribly to gain traction in their youths. And it was critical of western governments being complicit in war crimes in Palestine.

        Tell me, before tiktok, how many war crimes US commited were conveniently swept under the rug without consequences?

        Can’t have public be aware of that, can we now?

        But US wants to shape the narratives for the rest of the world with facebook, instagram and twitter and others. Failing to do that in their own country, they want to ban it as a last ditch resort. Can’t have narratives that don’t align with their propaganda and be critical of their military industrial complexes.

        But you do you. I have no horse in the race but I love the outrage when people are on the receiving end of “foreign influence in social media”. Not like social media companies in the US were surveilling rest of the world for the last decade.

        And it’s not like US hasn’t done this to Japan when it was going to become a better economy before.

        Cope.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          Wow, what a bunch of crap. Are you really, really holding up tiktok as a bastion of truth? Are you not aware of the many was crimes that US soldiers have been involved with that have sparked global outage, way before tiktok existed, because there really is a free press?

          The US doesn’t have soldiers in Gaza, it’s not commiting war crimes there. You can make a good case that the arms were providing to an ally are being used to commit a genocide, which is plenty bad enough, but don’t weaken the term “war crime” by using it inappropriately. And it’s not like people are only finding out about it through tiktok. Go read NPR and you’ll see quite a lot about it. Read AP. Read Reuters.

          But sure, go trust a site whose algorithms are controlled by the Chinese government and think that you aren’t being manipulated. You do you.

          • owen@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Exactly… if you want news - go to the sources of news. If you want funny dances and horribly acted skits - go to social media

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      parks

      A bunch of teenagers hanging out in a park will probably have the cops called on them

      school clubs

      The budgets for clubs have been cut. Also, there’s no school in the summer

      others’ homes

      If you don’t drive there’s no way to get there.

    • entropicshart@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Glad to see someone pointing this out.

      There are so many beautiful parks that are within walking distance or a short bike/bus ride.

      How about libraries or all of the game shops that host free events for everyone to join?

      Get your head out of your phone and see the life around you!

      • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think it’s very regional. Libraries and parks are going to get the first cuts when local government tightens its belts, they’re often save havens for the unhoused or those otherwise let down by society, and together that means in many areas they’re seen as maybe not unsafe, but not places overprotective parents want their kids going.

        • owen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Absolutely. In fact, I have found that areas with the most disposable income also get the best city funding. So the people who can afford to pay for third spaces (restaurants, clubs, golfing) also have the nicest local parks and public spaces.

          In my city, the low-income area local parks are literally paved with concrete and next to train tracks, busy streets and/or factories. It’s utterly bullshit

        • owen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          My man, you are completely Reddit brained. What are you even saying?

      • gullible@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        TikTok suggested that its users should petition politicians and the public to prevent its punitive purchase. It’s just kids with degenerating attention spans.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      8 months ago

      Simply different people expressing their opinion when they’re the ones concerned with the change happening at the moment.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      I still hate it for that, but I also hate that the US government only cares if our privacy is violated by foreign actors and not a bunch of Silicon Valley dweebs.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Honestly, while it’s obvious why Tiktok is getting singled out, I hope it can be used as a precedent for cracking down on other data collecting companies.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          It won’t, though, particularly because it’s specifically not required for TikTok to allow users to download their data if they’re divested to an American company before the deadline. Had anyone really cared, this would be a case for data privacy laws. But that’s not what it’s really about.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I know the details of the ban, but it will still bring the conversation to the general public more then not doing anyway at all.

            • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I don’t feel confident about that. The bill has two elements of wide appeal: 1) General distrust of China and 2) General dislike of TikTok. At least from what I’ve seen, very little attention has been paid to the privacy/data collection part of the bill outside of tech-saavy circles. I feel like GDPR would’ve been the much larger push for data privacy, but it has lost its novelty and nothing has changed on this side of the pond. Hell, even Cambridge Analytica hardly sparked any lasting changes.

              • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                1.I don’t trust China.

                1. I don’t trust Tiktok or like ultra short form media.

                So cool, cool.

                I really don’t have a horse in this race. Politics is a spectators sport and I’m just coasting until climate change makes this all moot.

                • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  My point wasn’t really that you shouldn’t care about those things, just that I don’t think this bill will make any difference when it comes to increasing data privacy protections. In the “best case” (by government standards), TikTok will still be around. It’ll just be operated by a US company, and those have not exactly been known to be responsible with user data.

                  The biggest concern even for people who hate TikTok is the broad wording of the bill that possibly restricts using a VPN to access said banned sites. It’s a very dangerous precedent to set and is a much bigger part of the opposition than any particular love of TikTok.

      • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah I think no one stops to ask who those silicon valley jerks sell our data to. The answer is anyone. Including big brother who otherwise cannot legally collect it - but it’s legal now because a company did it and we bought it!

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Exactly. It’s like it’s only bad if China gets all our data and influences us without Zuck and Musk getting their cut. But as long as they have to buy data and ads from them it’s fine.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Except that China can just buy it from American companies, mostly because our government won’t do anything to protect our privacy.

            • wakumul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              it’s even worse if it’s GCHQ gathering it and then just handing it over to the CIA, where the cia gathering it themselves would be illegal, but they use treaties and diplomacy as loopholes to subvert our actual legal protections.

    • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      8 months ago

      I still hate TikTok and am glad for the ban if it makes you feel better. Basically, what the other person said. It’s spyware trash that uses the way it controls opinions to control opinions on this topic too

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Jesus Christ not everything is fake, it’s one of thy most popular apps in the world of course there are people like it.

        You really need to try and get back in touch with reality

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Because tiktok is the only social platform that exists. Because libraries don’t exist. Because teens never go to the movie theater like their parents did.

    My sibling in Christ you posted this on a social platform used by minors that is not under threat by the government

    Some people just want to be angry.

      • owen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Movie theathers are also stupid expensive. Not something the average teen can do on a regular basis

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        A bunch of teenagers hanging out in a park are definitely going to have the cops called on them, no matter what they’re doing.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Clearly it’s a US-only thing, but even back in the 90s when me and my nerdy friends decided to brave the sunshine and hang out in a park we’d have the cops pull up and ask us to leave.

            All of the parks in my area cater to parents of kids under 10, so anyone who’s not there with a child of that age is immediately suspicious, especially to nosy Karens. Hell, I’d get nasty looks from moms when I would take my own kids to the park.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    8 months ago

    What if I told you that having absolutely no community third spaces is a result of car dependency?

    Ever heard people complain that it’s impossible to just meet new people in real life because everyone everywhere is busy? It’s because we don’t have third spaces anymore, and one really big reason for that is car dependency. People really don’t like to drive, for the most part, and they’re generally not going to go drive to hang out somewhere; it becomes both dangerous and a special pain in the ass if alcohol enters the equation, as it does for many (but not all) third spaces. In short, if people go to a third space, it’s usually going to be one inside their own hyper local community or they won’t bother. These are all generalities, of course; miss me with anecdotal exceptions. Well, we keep our cities badly zoned and low density so that you don’t really have hyper local third spaces, you just get weird, semi-local, sanitized big box “third spaces” (massive sarcasm quotes) like Chili’s or Starbucks that don’t actually fill that role. They just want you to spend money and get out, there’s no actual tie to the community.

    Having an outdoors that’s so utterly lifeless and hostile to anything that’s not a car that kids “hang out” on social media is neither normal nor desirable, unless you’re a tech exec, I guess.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      What if I told you that having absolutely no community third spaces is a result of car dependency?

      Then I’d suggest that if your only tool is a hammer, then every problem is going to look like a nail.

      Like, I get it, fuck cars, but North American culture has been car dependant while having history of having the some of the highest third space membership, even in my own lifetime. While I accept it as a factor of the erosion, it’s unlikely to even be the primary factor.

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah a big part of third space culture where I grew up was things like “let’s go to x” followed by six people getting in a car with two seatbelts because the nearest “x” was like 20 miles away. And the car itself could be a meeting place if someone who barely interacts with your group hears about a trip and asks to jump in the car too

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Yeah that works great assuming you have an already-established friend group within walking distance and parents that either have the time and will to chauffeur you around everywhere, or friend’s parents willing to do so with your own parents giving you the “freedom” to be driven around by people that are more than likely near-to-complete strangers to them. Which, in the age of helicopter parents, is a dying breed, and the first option almost completely excludes children of young, single, low-income, and otherwise struggling parents.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        That can be more or less true depending on the community. I imagine in the central and southeastern US, the decline of religion has been especially devastating in that regard. However you don’t see that pattern replicated in much more secular western Europe. In fact, they’re doing just fine for third spaces.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 months ago

    In the town where I grew up, there was a tiny park downtown where all the weird kids hung out. It was a funky little park which had a lot of character. Then they renovated it and I never see anyone there anymore when I go back.

    Of course, they took out all the benches and they took out the trees and walls that gave a modicum of privacy.

    There were always paranoid kids who thought the cops were watching the park from other buildings such as one of the bars across the street (college town) but getting rid of everything that made the park theirs and taking way any feeling of privacy killed it.

    My daughter is 13 now. We’re in another town. There is so little for kids to do. She spends most of the time talking to her friends on Discord.

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      Boomers:

      Kids don’t do anything anymore. They just sit on their phones inside all day.

      Also boomers:

      Hello, police? Yes, there is a group of teens at the park. I think they have drugs or sex stuff.

      Does no one remember what being a kid was like? Most people, especially teens, don’t care enough about you to be plotting against you. Let people live their lives.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        I forgot to say that the cops raided the park one day. The whole town was outraged, but it definitely didn’t help matters.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Everything out there for teens to do costs money… except the public library, which often has teen services.

      Yet another reason to support your local public library.

      • owen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        The theoretical basis of alienation is that a worker invariably loses the ability to determine life and destiny when deprived of the right to think (conceive) of themselves as the director of their own actions; to determine the character of said actions; to define relationships with other people; and to own those items of value from goods and services, produced by their own labour.

        For all the non-clickers

  • Melmi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 months ago

    As much as I don’t like TikTok, I don’t like the idea of the government censoring arbitrary apps under vague notions of “national security”.

    It would be one thing if they were passing legislation about surveillance in apps, but it’s clearly not about that or 99% of American apps would be under the chopping block (they’re selling data to arbitrary buyers, so the data can be obtained by “foreign adversaries” anyway). Instead, they’re just handing the executive power to strongarm any app into American control, or lose the huge American market.

    I feel like proponents of this are getting too distracted by their hatred of TikTok, and this nonsense about third spaces isn’t helping. TikTok is just the beginning, and a convenient one because it’s such a hot topic right now.

    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/03/congress-should-give-unconstitutional-tiktok-bans

    • pixelscience@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s because it actually is a security risk with the Chinese government having the ability to do who knows what with a frightening amount of data. There is also the option of selling the company to one that isn’t related to the Communist Party government, but no one seems to be talking about that option.

      The only slippery slope is more apps owned by a foreign government that is not exactly our friend.

      If the app was owned by North Korea, would you be cool with it too?They aren’t banning Instagram and Facebook.

      • Melmi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        If they were regulating Instagram and Facebook, I’d actually be happier about it. It’s not like the US is some bastion of digital privacy, and TikTok is bad because the data use is unregulated. Our own wholesome homegrown data brokers spy on us just as much, and they too do who knows what with the data.

        American data brokers are no better, and are happy to sell data to foreign powers. Biden had to make an executive order about it recently. Blatant privacy invasion has become a standard practice in the tech industry, and there are a million different companies trading your information around. That’s the real issue at play here, and TikTok is just one of many fish in the sea. My data might even be more valuable to American companies than Chinese ones, because the American ones stand to exploit me for more profit. Or they’ll sell it to government (s), which… Yeah.

        And of course TikTok could be sold. That’s exactly what I was talking about with strongarming—sell your platform to a corporation in our jurisdiction, or else we cut you off from a huge part of your userbase. It’s not really an option, it’s an ultimatum. It’d be one thing if we regulated the use of that data, but we don’t really—we don’t have meaningful data privacy laws here, at least not that apply in this circumstance. We’re being spied on just as badly. Forcing them to move here would just mean American agencies and companies would have more control over the platform, and more access to the data it generates, neither of which they’ve built much trust in their ability to do ethically.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s not like Tik Tok is doing things out of the kindness of their hearts, kids. They’re making money off of you. I bet if there was a meatspace location that tracked all your conversations and pushed ads to you they’d let you hang out there for free, too.

  • Kit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    I grew up in a time where you couldn’t loiter, I had no money to spend, and social media didn’t exist. I still managed to have a lot of fun. Why are people acting like TikTok is some kind of life necessity that they’ll die without?

    And I’m certain that if TikTok is banned, an American-based competitor will pop right up.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why are people acting like TikTok is some kind of life necessity that they’ll die without?

      Some of them are paid to act that way, the others are just following the trend. It’s how marketing works now, especially if you have zero ethics.

  • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nothing about this is true what the heck? Kids aren’t just banned from ever being anywhere, my friends and I hung out in parks and at restaurants and at eachothers’ houses all the time. And anyone who’s been on social media and thinks it’s an appropriate place for kids is very sus or naive. Even the most squeaky clean of sites are cesspools of bullying and grooming and right wing propaganda, and any use beyond looking at memes and catching up with irl friends should be supervised to some extent.

    This post acts like we live in a dystopia where kids aren’t aren’t allowed to do anything and need social media to have any friends, which is only the case in really shitty circumstances where a kid is super lonely irl or somehow lives somewhere with no park or library or other good hangout spots. The banning of one specific app (which you can just get around with a vpn) isn’t going to disenfranchise all zoomers overnight, it’ll be a minor inconvenience people get over when they get a vpn or go to a different site. I just wish the people pushing to ban tik tok would apply the same pressure to American companies also pushing propaganda and doing shady stuff with your data

    • Andy Reid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also the new law is not taking tiktok away it’s just forcing the app to be sold to an american company

      I can’t help but feel like all the “tiktok ban” discussion is straight up disinformation trying to scare kids

  • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hehe, there’s someone fearing about losing their dopamine source. Typical addict behavior.

  • twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tbc I understand the sentiment here, but it’s not a very well thought out take. Plenty of advertising revenue is being generated by teens’ presence on tiktok. They are being exploited monetarily by an extremely hostile and repressive foreign power.

    I get that there are nuances to this but it’s not “oh look the teens’ one free place to just be is being taken away!” It’s not free in any way.

    Like yeah, we should be building community infrastructure to allow for teens and humans in general to have meaningful engagement with each other. In no way is any social media platform a solution for that deficit and it’s dumb to pretend it is.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      IMO it’s pretty sad for anyone to think that using a social media app is equivalent to hanging out with friends. You’re filtering your entire reality through a corporate controlled micro-computer basically.

      It’s also a myth that teens don’t have anywhere to hang out. They could just go out and do it if they wanted to, people most likely won’t give a fuck if they see some kids hanging around somewhere. There are parks, libraries, malls, streets, alleys, underpasses, etc. (Adjusts the onion on my belt) … Back in my day we just went out and walked or biked or skated somewhere and did random bullshit wherever.