0x2d@lemmy.ml to 196 · 9 个月前rulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1723cross-posted to: femcelmemes
arrow-up1723imagerulelemmy.ml0x2d@lemmy.ml to 196 · 9 个月前message-square47fedilinkcross-posted to: femcelmemes
minus-squareSubArcticTundra@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up67·edit-29 个月前This will make for interesting primary source material in a 2075 history book
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up19·9 个月前I mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wavlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·9 个月前The original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing1 the word “literally.” Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives’ version laughable, and it’s been mostly shared ironically ever since. 1I don’t necessarily agree with the post. It’s okay to use “literally” just for emphasis, in my opinion.
This will make for interesting primary source material in a 2075 history book
I mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.
The original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing1 the word “literally.” Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives’ version laughable, and it’s been mostly shared ironically ever since.
1I don’t necessarily agree with the post. It’s okay to use “literally” just for emphasis, in my opinion.
They should have put the /s