UVALDE, Texas (AP) — An investigation Uvalde city leaders ordered into the Robb Elementary School shooting cleared local police officers of wrongdoing Thursday, despite acknowledging a series of rippling failures during the fumbled response to the 2022 classroom attack that left 19 children and two teachers dead.

Several family members of victims walked out in anger midway though a presentation that portrayed Uvalde Police Department officers of acting swiftly and appropriately, in contrast to scathing and sweeping past reports that faulted police at every level.

“You said they did it in good faith. You call that good faith? They stood there 77 minutes,” said Kimberly Mata-Rubio, whose daughter was among those killed in the attack, after the presentation ended.

Another person in the crowd screamed, “Cowards!”

Jesse Prado, an Austin-based investigator and former police detective who made the report for the Uvalde City Council on Thursday, described several failures by responding local, state and federal officers at the scene that day: communication problems, poor training for live shooter situations, lack of available equipment and delays on breaching the classroom.

“There were problems all day long with communication and lack of it. The officers had no way of knowing what was being planned, what was being said,” Prado said. “If they would have had a ballistic shield, it would have been enough to get them to the door.”

  • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    166
    ·
    8 months ago

    Did anybody honestly think they were gonna do something to them? There was a whole reason while there were marches for police accountability, BLM, and racism during covid.

    Nothing changed.

    ACAB

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Nothing changed.

      Not true!

      A bipartisan bill was passed to increase Federal police budgets by something like $40 billion.

      Nevermind all that police protest, we just need to give cops more money, I guess, and that will solve everything. /s

        • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Hey, give them a break. They’re a persecuted minority!

          Or they persecute minorities. One of the two.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 months ago

            Hey, give them a break! They work a dangerous job and just want to go home every day! Never mind that they’re not even in the top 10 most dangerous jobs, or that they’ve willingly signed up to put their lives on the line. No, they just want to go home at night donchaknow!

          • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            When you’re a cop, you can be both persecuted and persecutor. If only we could harness the power of their flip flopping to generate electricity, the police would finally do more good than harm.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Didn’t you read their quote? They didn’t go in not because they were cowards who shirked their duty, it was because they didn’t have a bulletproof shield

        Clearly we just need to keep arming the police until the protection trickles down

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    8 months ago

    if they just had a ballistic shield they could have made it to the door

    The state trooper that finally shot the fucker literally ran in with a shot gun. Fucking cowards.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      8 months ago

      … This ghoul seriously forced in a talking point asking for more equipment? To grieving parents who watched their kids die while the police were derelict in their duty? 50% of the city budget isn’t enough huh?

      The report for the Uvalde city council… was conducted by Jesse Prado, an Austin-based investigator and former police detective.

      Ah. “We’ve investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing” despite the feds openly stating the opposite

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yup, once a team decides not to go in, they won’t go. There will always be another goalpost to move. If they had the shield, they would be waiting for one more guy, or a specialized unit or a robot to go in.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    8 months ago

    I dunno. If only people had voted in a change of leadership after a failure of leadership or something.

    • smolyeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      8 months ago

      Uvaldes is majority conservative according to Google, so that wouldn’t have happened. I expect nothing less of Texas

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        68
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s what makes me saddest. Their community was wounded directly and that wasn’t enough to cause change. There’s no hope for them.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, unfortunately they got the government they voted for, and decided that nothing was good enough.

      • Traister101@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        8 months ago

        Are you actually doing a “Look at the bright side of a child massacre the police did jack shit about”??? Wtf is wrong with you people why are your brains so broken

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m sure this is a bit, but it’s a bad bit that doesn’t make much sense.

        • BaronOfHair@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          “Are you actually doing a “Look at the bright side of a child massacre the police did jack shit about”???”

          Benefits emerge from even the most dreadful events, just as success yields it’s share of drawbacks. Incidents of mass child murder are hardly exempt from this principle

              • BaronOfHair@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Salvador Ramos was a true Progressive, unlike celebrity posers in the mold of Greta Thunberg. Most yap about the dangers of overpopulation, yet do very little to rectify this malady. Ramos went out and decreased the number of humans on this planet, rather standing in front of the cameras, yapping about how much he cares

            • BaronOfHair@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Is it not more horrible for those who’ve experienced an event they find unpleasant to stay locked in a cycle of telling themselves “This is horrible… I can’t bear it!!!”? Nothing but further misery can come from that

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        Emotions have cooled as much as they ever will, or should. Do you think parents will forget about children who died while the cops stood around and prevented the parents from going in to save them? They never will.

        And parents whose kids survived, you’re wrong about them. They’ll never think “Thank god it was my neighbor’s kid who died, not mine.” That’s not how decent humans think.

        • BaronOfHair@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I never asserted that they would “forget”, just that they’d come to appreciated the potential perks which came out of these events, rather than viewing them in a one-dimensional fashion

          "And parents whose kids survived, you’re wrong about them. They’ll never think “Thank god it was my neighbor’s kid who died, not mine.”

          You’re engaging a great deal of mind reading/jumping to conclusions there

          • orcrist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            If you write in ways that suggest that people should look on the bright side after a mass shooting, I think the conclusions are merited.

            • BaronOfHair@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              You really believe it’s healthy for folks to exacerbate and prolong their misery, by NOT developing alternate ways of viewing an event they find unpleasant?

      • bryan@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 months ago

        He got 64 percent of the vote in the primary. He’s running against two other republicans. The do-nothing incompetent sheriff is still likely to win.

          • reddig33@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            What do you call it when an incumbent wins his primary against same party challengers if not re-elected?

            • Snot Flickerman
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              8 months ago

              I mean, the Clown with Short Bowels is being annoyingly pedantic, but they’re not wrong.

              What do you call it when an incumbent wins his primary against same party challengers if not re-elected?

              I would personally go with “The Party’s Chosen Candidate” but I understand that’s pretty wordy.

              • ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                8 months ago

                I feel that with the general turmoil of US politics in recent years, providing correct information is becoming increasingly important. How are people supposed to take part in a system they don’t understand?

                Even if OP was saying it flippantly, the next person reading it may not know that.

                • Snot Flickerman
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  I agree, but unfortunately being a pedant can be annoying, even to other pedants.

                  Accuracy is indeed important, but that’s not going to make humans, you know, stop being human and stop responding emotionally instead of thoughtfully. Humans are gonna human and damn it if they aren’t irrational beasts. I should know, I am one.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        But what are his chances in the general? Is it a location where the “real” election is the primary and whoever has an R by their name in the general will win?

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yup, Uvalde is majority Republican and the election is expected to go to Republican candidates. Since he won the Republican primary, he basically already won the general.

  • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    Since the last yellow drop of piss leaked out of the cowards who were at that school that day the city was always going to find that every single law enforcement officer onsite at the Uvalde massacre acted appropriately.

    They are facing massive lawsuits and they will do nothing to give the opposing litigants any ammunition to use against them in court.

  • ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 months ago

    So they’ve (officially) done nothing wrong? Does that imply that it’s not wrong to laze about while a shooter—who they obviously knew about—works unimpeded to hollow out classrooms with a fucking carbine?

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      8 months ago

      Legally I think that’s exactly what that implies. Cops are under no obligation to defend anyone. They are law enforcement officers, not protection for civilians.

      ACAB. Their job is to keep us in line, not protect us.

  • Nualkris@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 months ago

    Didn’t they just overwhelmingly reelect the sheriff that was part of that fiasco?

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I always saw them more as cunts, personally, but I suppose they can be more than one thing.

  • Souyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    Where was this outrage when it came to voting against the same sheriff? Or voting for Abbott?

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The investigator who presented the report blamed families who rushed to the school that day for compromising the police response, prompting an eruption of anger from several families and some stormed out.

    Classy, investigator-who-prepared-the-report. What are you, some dumbass cop?

    Jesse Prado, an Austin-based investigator and former police detective who made the report for the Uvalde City Council,

    Oh. Yeah. Well.

    Yeah.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      So every time you see police protecting nazi protesters, remember: they chose to protect those nazis. Just like they chose to let kids bleed out in Uvalde.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nononooo…

        They’re not defending Nazis. They’re defending other cops. Who happen to be Nazis.