For 1, your statement is just straight up false. People who care about inclusion are not the first to attack people’s physical attributes.
For 2, are people losing their civil rights and protections just for having tiny hands or orange skin or bad haircuts? Then it’s not the same as race, gender and sexuality is it
For 1, your statement is just straight up false. People who care about inclusion are not the first to attack people’s physical attributes.
For 2, are people losing their civil rights and protections just for having tiny hands or orange skin or bad haircuts? Then it’s not the same as race, gender and sexuality is it
The orange skin thing isn’t natural. He does that to himself. Oompah-Loompa has been a popular look for the American bourgeoisie for a while.