Companies knew for decades recycling was not viable but promoted it regar
You must log in or register to comment.
Reduce —> The most important thing to do.
Re-use —> Second-most important thing you can do.
Recycle —> Literally scraping the bottom of the barrel in terms of effectiveness of reducing pollution.
There is absolutely a reason corporations honed in on the least effective of the three and tossed the other two out the fucking window. First two don’t jive with a consumer market filled with Planned Obsolescence.
No, plastics producers knew “recycling cannot go on indefinitely”. So did anyone else who spent a few moments thinking about it.
The same is true of paper recycling or even trying to reuse non-disposable goods. Nothing lasts forever.
That doesn’t mean recycling is not a “real” solution. There is real value in “prolonging the time until an item is disposed of”. Otherwise why bother to exercise and eat healthy - after all that only prolongs the time until you die.
John Oliver did a fantastic NSFW bit on this:
