• taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 months ago

    It becomes increasingly clear that internal combustion engines are simply not capable of having the kind of low emissions that a continued use of them would require, no matter what corporate propaganda would like to spread about them.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think there are still some relatively niche use-cases for them left. Specifically, if you’re using sufficiently few of them and/or using them in sufficiently rural areas, then all of the polluting outputs other than greenhouse gases become less of an issue, and if you’re running them on 100% biofuels, then they can be carbon-neutral. (Also, since vegetable oil doesn’t contain sulfur to begin with, an engine running on biodiesel emits zero SOx, which is nice.)

      In other words, replacing the cars and trucks that can reasonably be replaced with bicycles, trains, and electric automobiles (ranked from best idea to worst, by the way) is good enough; we don’t have to be perfectionist about it.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I have honestly never seen someone who brags about a Cummins who isn’t a douchebag. I have several truck friends, all of them agree Cummins is reserved for redneck douchebags.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    The company has seen no evidence that anyone acted in bad faith and does not admit wrongdoing

    I supposed the software bypasses just “accidentally” got committed and applied then. I suppose they just plum forgot to remove the

    if (emissionsCheckFailed)
    {
      emissionCheckFailed = false;
    }