4chan daily challenge sparked deluge of explicit AI Taylor Swift images::New AI image filters are “just another obstacle to ‘defeat,’” researcher says.

  • @Tolstoshev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1055 months ago

    I don’t see a solution to this one and we’re just going to have to live with people making pictures of whatever they want. It’s not like TS can stop me making an oil painting of her humping a dolphin or whatever.

    • @RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You can find TS NSFW images pretty easily. I searched to find some and see what the hubbub was all about and frankly it’s just the same old porn stills. It doesn’t matter that it has TS’s face on it. I guess some people get off on that sort of fantasy, but I was not impressed, but then that sort of stuff really doesn’t do much for me anyway.

      E: I’m not kink shaming. IMO people getting off on the fact that it was done is pretty lame.

      • @clayh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        175 months ago

        “I spent hours scouring the deep web for Taylor swift nudes but I def don’t get off on that. Some guys do I hear, though. Gross, right?”

        • @GiveMemes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          This comment just shows how hilariously out of your element you are lmaooo. Imagine, first of all, thinking that the deep web is the dark web, secondly that you need to access the dark web in order to find deep fakes (Are you blind?)

          I honestly couldn’t care less about this and think deepfake porn is not a good thing but like… it’s out there and it’s incredibly easy to find.

          You could literally go search “Taylor Swift deepfake porn” on Google and find it first result lmao

            • @GiveMemes@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              20
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Defensive for saying you’re wrong? OK :)

              I literally verified my comment in 22 seconds by looking up the exact search term I gave you.

              What’s the deep web? You seem really educated about it from your willingness to use the term.

              • @clayh@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Sorry if I hit a nerve, swiftie 🙃

                Your secret is safe with me lol

              • @clayh@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Yes I’m talking about the deep web and not the dark web 🤣🤣🤣

                Sorry if my words are too big for you to understand

                • @GiveMemes@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  25 months ago

                  I think I figured it out. You try to take this weird moral high ground over somebody correcting your misinformed comment on a forum because you jack off to Taylor Swift deepfakes and feel really bad about it.

                  Idk that’s the best I can come up with for why this upsets you so much

    • @antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      135 months ago

      Do people actually enjoy seeing those pictures? I can sort of understand generating them for shock value, but finding them erotic or pleasing??

      • @vexikron@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Well uh, yes. Its the internet, there are sites where people devote massive time and energy to discussing the wankability but also canonical accuracy of depictions of ‘what if 14 year old anime girl characters actually had penises that are canonically accurate and true to the art style as well’.

        At least one person is into the weirdest shit you can imagine.

        There was at one point a group of people who filmed themselves putting fleshlights in car exhausts and fucking them, then this got even more weird and people seemingly seriously said they had actual sexual attraction to vehicles, then people started fucking the exhaust pipes with no fleshlights, then someone , possibly multiple people actually seriously injured themselves this way.

        And also yes to shock value, now that 4chan is involved, its more or less ‘this is funny because it will very likely make someone angry, and also theres no real way this sort of thing can be prevented, here, lets prove it’.

        I have stared into the void, it has stared back into me, and destroyed all nearly all notions commonly assumed to define reason and humanity.

        Do not do as I have done.

        • @grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          115 months ago

          At least one person is into the weirdest shit you can imagine.

          “There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe weirdest shit you can imagine is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.

          There is another theory which states that this has already happened.”

          (with apologies to Douglas Adams)

        • @evranch@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          There was at one point a group of people who filmed themselves putting fleshlights in car exhausts and fucking them

          There was another, way funnier phase when guys just taped them into the exhaust and started up the car to see them get crazy blown out. Worth a watch if you haven’t seen just how stretchy these things are, but now I’m scared to search for “fleshlight in car exhaust”

          • @vexikron@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            Not sure of the timeline, but yes I remember that.

            I would not be surprised if something like 2% of the people who saw that were aroused enough or bored enough to… take the next step, leading to the … autophilia stuff.

            Ugh.

      • @db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        Having not seen them it’s difficult to judge on any grounds beyond subjective morality of their creation.

  • kingthrillgore
    link
    fedilink
    English
    245 months ago

    I miss the days when 4chan was good.

    Okay that’s not right, 4chan was never good. I miss the days when it was bad, but it wasn’t a cesspit of sociopath trolls trying harder to outtroll other trolls and society at large.

    • @ShunkW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      105 months ago

      When was that? I remember finding it in the early 2000s and it was awful even then. But I only spent my time there on b

    • @erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      Maybe it’s you who changed, and graduated from sociopath troll to sociable human being?

    • @banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      I was a b-slur through the 00s and I dunno if anyone would say it was “good,” but it was definitely less irony poisoned.

  • @JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    145 months ago

    If it isn’t real then what’s the point? It’s no longer Taylor Swift. I guess if you use your imagination real hard it might work.

    • @sonovebitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      205 months ago

      if you use your imagination real hard

      “Stop right there, criminal scum. You are infringing our Intellectual Property!” /s

    • @BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      “Me when my lovely (but sometimes forgetful) Chinese mailroom attendant hands me an unmarked box without saying who it should be given to”

  • @NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    85 months ago

    Is all this Taylor Swift content atm a not-so-subtle response to her rigging the Superbowl so she can endorse Joe Biden?

    • Monkey With A Shell
      link
      fedilink
      English
      105 months ago

      Of course as we all know, the Superbowl is the only place and time internationally known celebrities are able to express their political preferences.

    • @Guntrigger@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      It’s quite impressive how many people seem to think you actually believe she is rigging the superbowl to endorse Biden, rather than just referring to that batshit theory to make a sane point.

      • @Murdoc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        I know I’m confused as I took it as being facetious. Then again there are people that believe weird stuff like that. Maybe I was just being generous and giving them the benefit of the doubt? Or maybe they’re just trolling. 🤔

        • @Guntrigger@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          I mean I actually think it’s an astute point behind the satire. The challenge probably did start on 4chan because of the hubbub going on around the conspiracy theory, if not by someone who actually believes it. Seems weird to downvote just because someone references that theory though.

      • @NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        I actually believe she’s going to announce her own candidacy and do a “Taylor’s Version” of the Constitution that technically allows each of her “eras” to serve for two terms. This is all made very clear by the Easter Eggs in her Instagram account.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Graphika researchers—who study how communities are manipulated online—traced the fake Swift images to a 4chan message board that’s “increasingly” dedicated to posting “offensive” AI-generated content, The New York Times reported.

    Fans of the message board take part in daily challenges, Graphika reported, sharing tips to bypass AI image generator filters and showing no signs of stopping their game any time soon.

    “While viral pornographic pictures of Taylor Swift have brought mainstream attention to the issue of AI-generated non-consensual intimate images, she is far from the only victim," López G. said.

    Rather than expecting platforms to chase down the harmful content, López G. recommended that AI companies should get ahead of the problem, taking responsibility for outputs by paying attention to evolving tactics of toxic online communities reporting precisely how they’re getting around safeguards.

    “These images originated from a community of people motivated by the ‘challenge’ of circumventing the safeguards of generative AI products, and new restrictions are seen as just another obstacle to ‘defeat,’” López G. said.

    Experts told The Times that 4chan users were likely motivated to participate in these challenges for bragging rights and to “feel connected to a wider community.”


    The original article contains 504 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 62%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • @essteeyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Rather than expecting platforms to chase down the harmful content, López G. recommended that AI companies should get ahead of the problem, taking responsibility for outputs […]

      What if I want to make pornographic images of myself? What if Taylor Swift wants to?

      The software is out there already, the images are life-like, and the models run offline. There’s absolutely no way of recorking that bottle now.