• ripley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      9 months ago

      It went up like four bucks this month for me this past month. I feel like I am in a no-win situation. I want to support the authors of the videos and music I like, make the platform sustainable, and I hate ads and data harvesting. There doesn’t seem to be reasonable way to satisfy all three objectives (or even two).

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m mostly in the same boat with supporting the creators, however I don’t really like Google to be honest. I end up supporting creators outside the platform, such as via Patreon or by watching on Nebula. Most of my YT consumption is done via NewPipe, Piped and Freetube

        There’s a little part of me that likes the fact that YouTube is burning a hole in Google’s finances tbh lol

      • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Patreon for the ones you really like, and substituting watching my own content on Plex is how I’m weening myself off YouTube.

        • prince of space@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I wish there was arr software for YouTube that included Sponsorblock. Every one I’ve tried hasn’t really worked. Need it to be automated or I’m stuck using YouTube.

      • laurelraven
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Unfortunately, anymore, even if you pay, companies (especially googie) are STILL harvesting and selling your data… I don’t know if there’s a way to avoid it without either unplugging entirely or going full in on dark web and anonymous browsing techniques, and even then, your data will still be harvested from other people in your life

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      If it wasn’t as freaking high as it is there would be a lot more premium users. Every other streaming service is full of professionally made movies and TV shows. YouTube is absolutely chock-full of berate crap where they’re barely paying anybody but the top 1%. It’s a grift. It should be priced with the absolute cheapest services out there.

      • Technofrood@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        The price makes a little more sense if you factor in it also includes YouTube music, which puts it more on par with a premium Spotify subscription, with the benefit of no ads on YouTube. Which is basically how I got YouTube premium, I was already paying a monthly fee for Google Play music as it was at the time, and the upgrade to add YouTube premium was only £2 extra a month.

        • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sure but a LOT of us don’t want the music service and have never used it once. People like me aren’t costing them a penny on music and if they offered a plan without music I’d jump in an instant.

          • EineCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            This is my issue. I have and love Apple Music and do not want to pay for another music service. If YT gave me an option for an ad-free YT without music for only like $3 or $5 a month, I’d jump on it. For now, I’ll continue using uBlock Origin and SmartTube.

          • borZ0 the t1r3D b3aR@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I agree with this sentiment completely. Not sure if they still do it or not, but YTM started out letting you upload your own music and then being able to access it across any device through the app. YTM doesn’t have the best catalog now, let alone when they started so i think the upload feature was a way of acknowledging that. I uploaded both local bands that are defunct and literally nowhere online and artists that didn’t embrace the internet age and restricted their catalogs. I can still listen to the music i uploaded back then through the app or a browser. That feature set it apart from the other options available at the time. I guess I’m trying to say that i also want to own my own music, but i dont hate the convenience of some of it floating in the cloud waiting for me to pull it down. Speaking of… ownCloud is dope and what i’m transitioning to for my media. When in doubt, roll your own solution.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              As long as it own cloud doesn’t do what next cloud did and try to rename all of my files on import then only retain their names and databases. Currently holding my own with Plex /jellyfin

        • ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, that’s what made me get premium. Even before the adblocker crackdown, the prospect of supporting creators and being able to ditch Spotify’s horrible artist compensation model made it a simple choice.

        • PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I was in the same boat for ages and was happy paying as I kept the original rate. Then they bumped it by almost 50% end of December. Quit before the change took effect and have been using ad block ever since. The ONLY thing I miss is YouTube music as I’ve gotten too lazy to rip the remixes/soundtracks that aren’t on other streaming services.

      • elgordio@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        While YouTube doesn’t commission, much, content it does store disproportionately more data. A streaming site has maybe 1,000,000 hours of content. That amount of content is uploaded to YouTube every day. It’s a totally different business model.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          And, I don’t think I should be the one paying for that.

          They should charge minor storage fees to the creators and uploaders. You pay to put your content up there if people watch it you get paid back as many multiples as necessary. It would be a fantastic method to reduce the amount of trash video stored up there that nobody ever watches.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’d say we’re at an impasse, but if I don’t buy premium and I don’t watch ads in their content, they’re not getting paid.

              If they paid a pittance to keep their storage and it pushed their quality up and push the price of premium down more people would watch and they’d make a hell of a lot more money.

                • linearchaos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I only started blocking the ads when yt started allowing 2 back to back 15 second advertisements and creators started putting in mid rolls.

                  This crap they’re pulling is downward spiral. They can’t get 20% more yoy by squeezing people to pay Netflix prices for crap. And most of the creators need patrion to even survive.

                  I truly hoped something like Odyssey could survive and we could just dht our likes. But it just becomes a sesspool.

          • borZ0 the t1r3D b3aR@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            It would be a hard-sell these days to charge someone to gamble on whether or not their content is going to get any views. My guess is that the conent economy et al is like an iceburg, it takes a lot to float it but only a little bit is worth seeing the light of day. Ie, you have to host a ton of garbage to be able to sift out the gems.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Hard sell maube but they’re the only game in town. I suspect it’s not a matter of if but when.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    And it still doesn’t have sponsorblock. Free is more feature rich than paid. Hahaha

  • eskimofry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 months ago

    This “Article” is short on details, And according to this article Google did not reveal data about subscriptions in the recent earnings call. I can only think this a PR piece to fluff up Google’s shares and discourage critics. Unless Google can be confident enough to explain which regions added subscribers and how much of such a subscription was part of a bundle… We can’t conclude that their anti-adblocking measures and price hikes were successful.

    Example: India would fluff up numbers without adding as much revenue (bundles are common and subscription prices are low) than NA or EU

  • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s over a billion dollars a month. If they’re still operating at a loss with all that then it’s their own incompetence at fault.

    • FlumPHP@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I want the creators I watch on YouTube to continue to get paid, both from YouTube and their sponsors. My contributions through premium are sliver of what they see, but if everyone stopped supporting them in that way, the total would be zero.

      I back some of them on Patreon where I can, but it’s not economically feasible for me to back them all in such a way.

  • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    How many of those subscribers are like me, definitely watching YouTube from Argentina.

  • Kyouki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    marketing tactics to get even more to subscribe, ala “x amount of people got it so it must be good”.

    Yet it feels like I got better things to spend it on, as I don’t watch much anymore due to algorithm changes making me miss the prior new music uploads and or newer channels to discover.

    Every refresh contains the same or prior channels watched with the same content shuffled or worse, suggest old dated watched videos.

    • graymess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Meanwhile I’m thinking “ey, sounds like they’re getting enough money, now maybe they can leave me the fuck alone.”

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    I do have YouTube Premium, because between the ad-free movies and TV shows and the music, the family sharing option was cheaper than Spotify and a couple of streaming services we gave up, and the few new content creators I do watch get paid more. But if they keep raising the price, I’ll look for something else.

    • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      For me, almost all the media I consume is YouTube so I’m fine paying up to a point but if it goes past 20 without a heap more features I’m out. I was already shocked they took away “continue watching” from normal users.

    • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I had to get grayjay because revanced stopped working on an A13, but I can’t seem to find an auto play feature

  • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah I got it after some other lemming told me that you can get it for cheap with a family account. I pay 4 bucks per month now which apparently also supports YouTubers more than watching ads on their videos.

    • porkchop@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      How so?

      • I enjoy so many cooking shows, tech nerds, and drag queens that post videos that make me happy on YouTube.
      • I watch on my tv primarily
      • I’m so so so happy to support the individual creators who pour their life and so much love into their work, premium pays them more per view than ad-supported views.
      • I share with some friends, and they share their logins with me. Overall, my monthly cost for video services is low.
      • Usenet everything else ;)
      • celerate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is the first I’m hearing about the content creators getting paid out of the deal. YouTube needs to do a better job of letting people know this.

        • lapping6596@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          They really do. The only place I hear anyone talk about it is LTT and only during the wan show. It’s a major reason I have premium despite being the type of person who uses GrapheneOS.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Agreed on both claims.
            His opinions and arguments may be tainted the incifent but I geniunly believe that being the case.
            Though I believe I have heard about the extra cut elsewhere on some YT channels as well.

      • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Because YouTube is a shit company that fleeces all of the content creators they’d be nowhere without- while simultaneously giving the middle finger to everyone that uses their service.

        Yet amid all the whining and complaining about seemingly ALL of their business practices on a daily basis- we apparently have 100 million people willing to give them MORE money so they can continue abusing everyone that so much as even looks in their general direction.