U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said Monday she feels daily “frustration” as conservative justices move the country to the ideological right.

In an appearance at the University of California, Berkely School of Law, Sotomayor was asked how she copes with the consistently conservative rulings from the court.

“Every loss truly traumatizes me,” but “I get up the next morning,” she said in response to the question, The San Francisco Chronicle reported. The crowd — about 1,300 students — applauded.

In her remarks, she criticized her “originalist colleagues” whom she said have come up with “new ways to interpret the Constitution,” changing rulings “that some of us believed were well established,” the Chronicle reported.

The 6-3 conservative court has had an eventful couple of terms, making its mark on some of the most consequential aspects of everyday life — from overturning the federal right to an abortion to ruling affirmative action in colleges unconstitutional.

  • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    10 months ago

    The truly frustrating thing about all of this is that the courts composition can be changed by acts of congress. The republicans pulled some massive bullshit to get this court. Biden could run with the campaign promise to unfuck the Supreme Court. This would be massively popular. Just add justices to rebalance the court. It can be done.

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 months ago

      As much as I’d like that, the new justices would still need to get approved by congress. Unless we get 60 Dem senators, we’re stuck at 9 for the foreseeable future.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          10 months ago

          It doesn’t, but an act to change the size of the court would have to go through the House and Senate and we don’t have the votes in either body for that right now.

          Fun fact, the last time we changed the court size was to SHRINK it from 10 to 7 in order to deny President Johnson (no, the other one) a Supreme court pick.

          After he got bounced and replaced by Grant, they increased it back to 9 where it has been ever since.

          I wouldn’t be averse to something similar, shrink the court from 9 to 5, elimimate the 4 most recently added justices. Yeah, we’d lose Brown-Jackson, but that’s a small price to pay to get rid of Trump’s nominees.

          The court would then split 2 conservative, 2 liberal with Roberts as the swing vote.

          • egerlach@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            10 months ago

            IIRC, most legal scholars believe that shrinking the court doesn’t get rid of existing justices as they are appointed for life. It simply prevents the appointment of new ones.

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      Biden could run with the campaign promise to unfuck the Supreme Court. This would be massively popular.

      It would be massively popular but I don’t see it galvanizing new voters. Anyone civically engaged enough to understand the fuckedness of the supreme court was already planning to vote Biden.

        • modifier@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          He very much needs new voters. Anyway I’m not saying he shouldn’t do it, I’m saying it’s not a big vote getter.

      • bamboo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s sad how true this is.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It is just a generated string of letters and characters.

          Yeah that much is obvious. I’m just surprised you’re actually satisfied with it and using that name.

          • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t keep this account as a personal thing. It doesn’t matter to me as I’m not building relationships or anything so I’m happy with the minimal amount of effort I put into creating the name.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I don’t keep this account as a personal thing. It doesn’t matter to me as I’m not building relationships or anything so I’m happy with the minimal amount of effort I put into creating the name.

              Fair enough, though it seems like going out in public wearing a clown outfit. If you like clowns you may be okay with it, but you’d still stand out when no one else is wearing a clown outfit.

              Thanks for replying/explanation.