People keep talking about “Federalizing the National Guard” and now you’ve got other States pledging their NG to Texas in defiance of the Supreme Court (see image).

So is this what CW2 looks like?

P.S. I’m a Brit

  • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    11 months ago

    Highly unlikely this is what the civil war would be like. It’s not a state v state thing necessarily although that might be a small part of it. In the first civil war, the south unified and its people largely supported the war, except their slaves. It’s unlikely something like that will happen again. It’s not impossible but unlikely.

    What is much more likely is rural v city. Even in red states, cities are blue and will often vote for blue policies. Rural areas are where things get dicey. They’ve been largely left behind by the surge in industry and general expansion of the capitalist economy we currently have (they’ve had a lot of businesses (including grocery stores) close because more people are leaving, and their rural towns are frequently having their hospitals close leaving large swaths of areas where the nearest hospital is an hour away). As such, they’ve got a grudge against the cities. What’s likely to happen is rural counties and their local governments trying to cut off their food supply, starving the cities to win the battle. There’s tons more possibilities, but this one I think is the one that’s got the highest likelihood.

    Another possibility that is scary, but is highly dependent on the party of the people in power, is the government using their power to actually strike the cities, like in Syria where Assad bombed and used chemical weapons on his own people. Syria is actually a pretty good example of what more modern civil wars are like, or can be like. Governments v rebels and militias, and cities v rural (although there’s much less rural land in Syria).

    If you’re interested, the podcast It Could Happen Here has a great first season where they go over possible disasters including a civil war and a pandemic (it was actually made in 2019 so before covid). It’s really helpful and can teach a lot, especially for an outsider from across the pond. It also does a lot better job giving an explanation and actual sources.

    Hope this helps since it didn’t seem like you were getting a real answer.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The geographical separation of slave states by an actual border allowed the first Civil War to take place on a stage perfectly suited for traditional warfare. North/South division and the formal joining of the Confederacy by state governments kept it all straightforward. Point South and tell the generals “Go.”

      It definitely won’t be that simple again.

    • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      I had to stop listening to ICHH it gave me way too much anxiety and was just too stressed back when i listened in 2020. I’ve since taken up to instead listen to BTB and cool people who did cool stuff off the same network. Monsters that are usually dead and people who kick ass make me feel better.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Another thing the world ought to know is that the folks who are identified by “red” and “right” in America are in the minority.

      Significantly so.

      However our voting system uses geography / land as a modifier so while there are less of them they occupy a larger land mass and have an outsized vote strength because of that.

      When total votes in a state can be split 45-55 but the delegates go 90-10 there is a problem

      • skulblaka@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        Another fun thing about that is that most folks who identify “red” or “right” actually aren’t paying enough attention to know that. Go ask them, they think people like them make up 70% or more of the country. If they do try to activate their little civil war they are going to find themselves very quickly surrounded by folks who do not like them at all, as their expected 200-million strong army ends up actually only being 1.5 million people spread out over 30,000+ square miles. Watching the realization dawn on them might actually even be fun if it weren’t a herald of Troubles for America.

      • BaldProphet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Another thing the world ought to know is that the folks who are identified by “red” and “right” in America are in the minority.

        Significantly so.

        This isn’t accurate. In 2020, 29% of voters identified as Republican, 33% as Democrat, and 34% as independent. There certainly were more Democrats, but only by a 5% margin.

        Playing up exaggerated differences between the number of Democrats and Republicans and emphasizing the “we outnumber you” rhetoric is extremist and should be avoided. It makes you a part of the problem.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Fuck yeah, secession!” Says the Texan from the comfort of their lounge chair, beer in hand.

    These people are too comfortable to ever be willing to die for their stupid ideals. All it took was one MAGA idiot to get blasted on Jan 6th and then they all scattered like roaches. As soon as their lives were on the line, it was no longer a matter of grave importance. They all firmly believed that democracy was at stake, but were unwilling to fight for it to the death because they somehow must have known that it was bullshit, somewhere in the back of their pea-sized brains, they knew.

    By the time Texas starts asking people to show up to mustering fields, rifle in hand, the facade will fall apart. Biden doesn’t need to do anything. This sideshow of bluster and saber-rattling will fall apart on it’s own.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also, millions of people living in Texas are not originally from Texas and have no particular allegiance to Texas.

      • halfeatenpotato@lonestarlemmy.mooo.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Also, as a native Texan that still lives here because it’s not feasible to leave, I feel no particular allegiance to Texas. This government doesn’t represent anything I stand for – it’s infuriating. Fuck Texas, and fuck proud Texans.

    • Alpha71@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re thinking first civil war. This civil war is going to be about bombing and terror. And it will be MAGA idiots bombing govt facilities. But they’ll start first with places like gay bars and libraries.

      THEN the federal govt will get involved and it will devolve into a shit show from there.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        The federal government is already involved. The FBI has been a thing for decades. Are we really going to compare the pathetic levels we have now to the 1950s with the KKK?

        Here is the truth to any wannabe terrorist: none of you have gotten smarter but the federal government has. You are one guy, the government is a whole mess of guys spending decades studying ways to stop you. No company has any incentive to help you and has a big incentive to report you. Everyone is tracked now, every transaction recorded, every internet post, heck our very movements.

        Random acts are going to happen and it is awful but any kinda coordinated resistance will fail.

        Plus you know we are all fat now. Successful resistance movements are led by poor people who can live off the land. That Bundy Ranch ordering takeout thing really illustrated it well. Who do you know in your life that is capable of living in the woods as a revolutionary? Do you really see someone like Hannity or Ted Cruz sitting in a cave somewhere to lead his forces?

  • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not a totally unreasonable impression, but no, this will not turn into a second civil war. The Guard units of each state can be called up for federal duty. The National Guard is part of the US Department of Defense and thus ultimately answers to the DoD and the US president as commander in chief. The US military has multiple components, including regular services (eg the full time Army), reserve components (eg US Army Reserve) and National Guard components. The latter two are part-time military with one weekend per month training duty plus an annual training. Guards members and Reservists hold regular full time jobs.

    The Guard units are deployable by the governors of their respective states, and so can be used in emergency situations like natural disasters. They have also been deployed against what have been perceived as riots that threaten lives and properties of the individual states.

    However, they are subject to activation by order of the US president and they fall under the national command authority. Guard personnel take the same oath to the constitution as other military personnel, and cannot legally refuse federal activation. Guards personnel would be subject to courts martial and face potentially extreme penalties including being discharged from service under criminal conditions, being stripped of rank and benefits, and jail time in federal prison. This would be what we call a career limiting rule.

    So, if push comes to shove, Biden can activate the NG and order them to stand down or to implement policies to maintain order. Thinking the NG units and in particular their commanders would disobey a presidential order because they just love their state governor and hate the president so much is getting into Turner Diaries levels of right wing apocalyptic fantasy.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      All of which misses a critical point:

      The forming of the Confederacy wasn’t “legal” either.

      We can handwave away concerns about mounting threats of violence by citing regulation and law, but none of that actually addresses the underlying issue that if these people want to start shit, they will find an avenue.

      And let’s also not sit here, in 2024, and assume the institutions, norms, checks, and intended safeguards in our system will always work when they need to. We’ve seen far, far too many breakdowns and failures in our system over the last decade to believe otherwise.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s what frustrates me so much about the framing of the situation we’re in right now: most people - and the vast majority of major media organizations - are fully intent on presenting this as “normal”, but it’s very fucking clearly not. It’s assumed by so many that the rules will simply be followed… and then they turn around and cover Trump, whose whole bit is to not follow the rules because he doesn’t feel like it and wants to stay in power forever. It’s like being unconcerned about standing 3 feet away from an uncaged, unleashed siberian tiger because someone once told you at one point that it had been “trained”.

      • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        11 months ago

        You have to understand that the US military today is a very different organization than it was in the 1860s. I know - I served and majored in military history for my first undergraduate degree, and studied the civil war in particular. I also come from a military family with a father, grandfather, and uncle who served as officers until retirement age.

        Far right domestic terrorism is a real and developing threat coming from both former military personnel and from civilians. The election of a far right government that shreds the constitution is also a major threat to American democracy. But if the shit does come down, it’s not going to be because some Guardsmen decide that they’d follow DeSantis over Biden.

        Military justice is no joke. Falling on the wrong side of it can end people. The military is also very integrated and has political as well as ethnic diversity. I’m not saying you couldn’t find an Army colonel who wouldn’t want to engage in an armed rebellion, but the country today is very, very different than it was mid-19th century, and so is the military.

        Please do note that I do see the rise of American fascism as a real threat. It’s just not going to manifest because state Guard orgs decide to disobey orders.

        • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Since you studied the Civil War, I got a book from my grandfather before he passed, Don’t Know Much about The Civil War, by Kenneth C. Davis, and was wondering if you’ve read of heard of this book and if it would be a good resource or not to read about the Civil War? Or if you can recommend another book or author that is great for learning about the Civil War, I’d appreciate any helpful insights as I’m curious to learn more about the Civil War, thank you.

            • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Thank you! Luckily it’s at my local library so I’ll pick this up first thing tomorrow if they’re open, appreciate your help!

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        11 months ago

        Robert E Lee famously didn’t want to fight the North but didn’t think of himself as a traitor for doing so, because his loyalty was to his state first, to the US second. And that was a common mindset at the time.

      • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think it’s possible that there will be resentment, but those with rank would be risking everything for zero gain. It would be determined by the people who wear the birds and the stars, and although there have certainly been high ranking officers who have engaged in conduct we might consider treasonous, it’s simply not going to be a common enough occurrence.

        A Handmaid’s Tale scenario, where the US goes down the path of a Christian theocracy, is a possibility that concerns me,

          • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            You also have to factor in the fact that the military today is not a bunch of guys with rifles. It is carrier battle groups, fighter jets, sophisticated artillery systems, and other platforms that require massive supply chains to deploy and maintain. That’s just what modern warfare is. US aircraft carriers alone are crewed by 5000+ people.

            Raytheon, Northrop, and Lockheed are not going to side with Ohio against the US government. The question is about civil war, not about a single military unit going rogue until the members are arrested or killed. Keeping planes in the air and tanks running requires a lot more than Ohio can do. The Feds spend about a trillion dollars per year on the military, and some Confederate missile battery is going to be in trouble once they run low on things to shoot and when their vehicles start to break down.

            I’m not a fan of the military industrial complex, to say the least, but it’s an absolutely necessary part of warfare today.

              • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                The difficulty with that scenario is that the US is bound by two oceans and has a navy more powerful in some estimates than the rest of the navies in the world combined. Ukraine can be supplied because they’re contiguous with Western Europe. North Korea could be supplied by China, as could Vietnam. To supply the neo-confederates, Russia or China would have to cross an ocean and get past the US Navy, as well as the navies of other allied countries. Then they’d have to bring in the systems via either Mexico or Canada, both of which would be allied with the US.

                I think you could imagine a scenario where they smuggle in small arms, but not artillery or other modern weapons systems.

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      They have also been deployed against what have been perceived as riots that threaten lives and properties of the individual states.

      Yeah, like when they got called up against random citizens in Minneapolis…

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is exactly why DeSantis wants to revive the Florida State Guard.

    Biden should ignore Abbott right until the point he signs an order to interfere with Federal agents on duty. Then it’s a conspiracy & the Insurrection Act can be brought into play to clean house.

    • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Florida State Guard

      I had to search for that and it sounds kinda bad for states to have their own armies. I mean it’s practically the definition of raising an army in opposition to the Federal government. Looking at Wikipedia it was first activated in WWII to make up for the national guard going to war.

      That bit makes sense.

      But you’re not at war and you just reactivated it in 2020. Why? Why would Florida need it’s own army? That’d be like the Wales FM creating it’s own guard. By it’s nature it’s in direct opposition to the national (British) military. There’s no other way of looking at it.

      That feels like a major thing. Am I taking crazy pills - why is no one screaming? This is bad!!

      • skulblaka@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Am I taking crazy pills - why is no one screaming? This is bad!!

        This dog stays barking every single year and hasn’t bit anyone yet. Getting tired of hearing about it. Either they’re going to do something or they won’t, if they don’t, then they can shut the fuck up and life goes back to normal. If they do decide to finally do something about it, Texas gets razed to the ground and we rebuild NASA somewhere else. There is no situation here in which any significant percentage of people, except Texans, are going to be in danger. They will not take on the greater federal US and win, it’s not gonna happen. If they secede, they die, after losing all federal safety nets and trade agreements and then getting invaded by cartels. If they attempt an actual shooting war, they die, as 25,000 cowpokes show up with surplus AR’s just in time for Lockheed Martin to put a warhead on their foreheads.

        I want to be clear that I’m not in any way looking forward to this. It’s going to be rough and innocent people will die. But there is no legitimate path forward in which Texas doesn’t, at best, eat its hat. However that won’t stop them from threatening secession constantly. Any time something doesn’t go their way - “oh, oh, but I’ll leave the union! What then??? What’ll you do without Texas??” Fuck off Texas. Either shit or get off the pot but I’m tired of hearing about it. Texas brings nothing irreplaceable to the table and while I definitely do not think that turning Texas into glass is the good ending, it sure is one ending, and might be the one Texas chooses. Regardless I’m not that worried about it. The Gravy Seals wouldn’t stand up to an actual well-regulated militia let alone the full force and might of the United States Army. And there are a lot more leftists with guns than the Gravies think there are.

        Edit: just realized this was intended in the context of the Florida State Guard - that I know almost nothing about. But Florida is perhaps even less threatening than Texas, and since DeSantis has been in charge they’ve been doing a lot of nearly identical toothless posturing. All arguments also apply to Florida, except that at least 21% of their population is retirement age or older so they don’t even have that many fresh bodies to call on when their state guard gets turned into burger meat within two days of declaration of war.

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not a new civil war reason. It’s the same one as last time just packaged up a little different.

    Racism

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not even a new civil war. The last civil war only ended technically. In reality it went cold and has still been being waged all this time. It turned from a war of the rural South against the industrialised north. To a war on the industrialized from the rural.

    • JDubbleu@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I, for one, welcome the formation of the New California Republic. Washington and northern Oregon can join too if they’d like.

  • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Seems to be a distinct possibility. Posturing prior to the election, rattling sabers, they’re spoiling for a full-on shootin’ war contingent on losing the election, in my opinion.

    edit: I dare say, it might even be strategically advantageous for them to intentionally try lose, claim it was rigged, and use that to go live with the 4th riech.

    • LeadEyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think the tactical nukes will slow their ambitions for another hundred or so years. We can’t take these posturing fools seriously.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        11 months ago

        We can’t take these posturing fools seriously

        Have you just not been paying attention for the last…decade?

        Yes, we absolutely should.

  • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    A lot of you all must be too young to remember. This isn’t a new thing for Texas to do. They threatened to secede at least once (maybe twice) while Obama was president. Once it was straight out of the North Korean playbook, claiming a training exercise the military was conducting was a cover for a military invasion of Texas.

    • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      And thats why I’m not worried about them doing anything other than what they’re already doing. They know they would be fucked if they leave.

      And if they do? Well then we deal with it when that time comes. Hopefully a bunch of left leaning people leave, including my brother and his wife, and a bunch of MAGAts can go there and talk about how much they love America while also leaving it.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The older I get the more I eyeroll at the political posturing. It’s definitely worse than when I was younger, but also it’s all happened before. It’s just loud people trying to be loud to keep us all afraid and obediently going to work, then every 4 years it gets loud again so we vote for who they want us to.

      Real convenient the border is such a huge issue a few months before the election.

      Of course we still have to take it seriously, the minute we let our guard down they start implementing stuff, look at roe v wade, but even then they didn’t know what to do after that. It’s all about staying in power for them

      • jandar_fett@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I get what you’re saying, but at some point we have to admit that there really aren’t any adults at the table. A direct example is the governments covid response and another more recent is the emergence of the so-called freedom caucus. Basically I subscribe to the depressing notion that all these fuck head fascists that came before have sewn their seeds and now there is an alarmingly large amount of the populace who have drank the koolaid, made from those seeds, and even worse is a lot of the original sewers (heh), have lost the thread and are drinking their own koolaid…

      • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ok, but we also haven’t had such extreme right wingers in mainstream government before.

        And also, what about the National Guard thing?

    • ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Texas has made an issue over their independence and God-given right to be Texas, in defense of their the right to own chattel slavery since their first secession. From Mexico. In 1836.

      Texas reconfirmed their desire to die on the hill of their divine right to own people, by seceding from the US in 1861.

      After the civil war, Texas was a haven for the Confederates - and their ideology has been fomenting ever since

      They’ve been talking of secession openly since at least the 1990s.

      I think this is the first time since the civil war that other states have involved their national guards in support of a hotbed issue that could lead to a secession.

      Edit: correction to grammatical error.

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      The Dollop did a podcast on Jade Helm as it was happening. Definitely recommend listening to that one if you like American history podcasts. It’s episode 100 I believe

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    11 months ago

    I said this in another thread-

    Most Americans aren’t interested or even capable of fighting in a civil war. When you live paycheck-to-paycheck, you’re not going to abandon your family to fight on the front lines.

    And a huge percentage of Americans live paycheck-to-paycheck.

    Texas would have to have a draft.

    Good luck with that.

    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The tech bros in Austin are not going to the front lines. Front line at airport, maybe.

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not to mention states themselves are never more than 60%/40% leaning either way. It’s not like the more homogeneous populations of the 1800s.

      • 52fighters@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Bingo. If Texas tried to leave, a HUGE chunk of the population would revolt against the State of Texas. Many more would just leave. Very little good would remain.

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think the conservatives are sufficiently unified to form a single opposition army. The problem with basing your appeals on hating “outsiders” is that you end up with a lot of internal hatred too. There’s also a strong undercurrent of “no one can tell me what to do” that makes central control unlikely.

    What seems more likely are terrorist incidents, carried out be individuals and small groups, without any overall communication or strategy. We’re already seeing some of that. The lack of coordination won’t prevent it from happeing, but will prevent it from achieving anything.

    I don’t think there are very many people within the MAGA movement who honestly want to resort to violence, whatever they tell themselves. The ones who are actually willing are the ones who wanted to hurt someone anyway. Politics provides them with an excuse, not a motivation.

    I think we’re going to have a nasty time for a while, but I don’t think a right-wing takeover by violence has any chance of happening. I’m much more worried about a political takeover that then turns into an authoritarian coup. The left-wing has a much better chance of organizing as a whole, but I don’t think there are that many people ready to fight from that side either, but that could change as conditions get worse.

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      The right has been used, and steadily intensifying stochastic terrorism for a while now. You’re right, it’s not a strategy for a military takeover of the US. It’s just one step in the political takeover.

  • CompostMaterial@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    11 months ago

    Those states are going to be in a rude awakening when they realize they are broke because the blue states are by far the largest contributors to federal funding. When they cut that off, the welfare state will come crawling back quickly.

    • xorollo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      The welfare states regularly turn down federal funding because they do not care about the lower income portions of their state. Alabama will just have fewer people able to feed their selves.

  • AlphaNature@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    11 months ago

    It all seems quite a bit overblown to me. There’s legal precedent for the President to take over a state’s national guard and use federal troops to enforce a court order (see Brown v Board of Education):

    “In September 1957, Arkansas governor Orval Faubus called out the Arkansas Army National Guard to block the entry of nine black students, later known as the “Little Rock Nine”, after the desegregation of Little Rock Central High School. President Dwight D. Eisenhower responded by asserting federal control over the Arkansas National Guard and deploying troops from the U.S. Army’s 101st Airborne Division stationed at Fort Campbell to ensure the black students could safely register for and attend classes. […]” (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education)

    The current wording of the Insurrection Act provision (which has been amended a few times since initial adoption), according to Wikipedia:

    "Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion."
    

    Just my $.02 but I’d guess either the feds back down or Texas does. Hopefully nobody gets trigger happy.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The reference to Little Rock Nine suddenly made me realize that Forest Gump was 38 at the time of Forest Gump.

      I’m 38 now. As tired as I am of Hollywood reimagining films from the nineties, I would appreciate a Forest Gump born in the 80s. The whole concept could really be repeated every 30 years or so.

      • yumpsuit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Brother, your idea is commendable, but the weave of history will be incinerated if you give all of that malign power to the Bubba Gump Shrimp Company.

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      The aftermath of racial desegregation court victories are some of the most interesting things in recent US history. A law would be struck down and sort of left like that… and people would take it upon themselves to organize and challenge the new law, often in the face of violent opposition. Freedom Riders taking busses down to the south to challenge desegregation of public transit being met with mobs and put in jail.

  • OpenStars@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 months ago

    I read how most experts agree that there will be some kind of “constitutional crisis” within the next decade. The impeachment 1, impeachment 2, and January 6 attacks already show the rumblings of what is to come.

    Personally I find it doubtful that a full civil war would be the means though bc of the disparity b/t military resources at the federal vs. lower levels. Thus, probably something else, perhaps extremely mundane e.g. Trump runs for President, and bc of the Israeli conflict in Gaza and whatever else Russia manufactures between now and then Biden loses, then Trump simply declares himself Emperor.

    Or maybe even that much paperwork will not happen and the government will simply never pass another federal budget again, thus ending the federal level by default of obstruction.

    So probably not Civil War, at this time and over this event (no matter how much the clickbait media tries to get its clicks), but even so… something is coming indeed, down the road in some form.

    • slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      Honestly, it’ll probably wind up becoming an American version of The Troubles. Republicans are cowards, and I doubt there are very many who are truly willing to fight and die for their cause. However, there are plenty of people willing to commit terrorist bombings and acts of sabotage if they think they can get away with it, and the US is huge. There are still plenty of places to hide if that’s the case.

      And if Trump wins reelection, I can’t imagine many blue states putting up with it, and the same thing will happen from the opposite direction.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        If it does go down, it’ll be rural people driving into cities to shoot them up, plant bombs, or drive people over with their trucks. That’s what it’ll look like.

        • OpenStars@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          “Will”? Check the news… it’s been happening for awhile, just not terribly successfully. I think we get something like at least one such event every other month.

      • OpenStars@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t know how liberals will react tbh. Usually they try to work within the system, but if that should ever prove to become impossible… I haven’t studied enough history to get any kind of accurate impression, but it’s worth noting that nothing like it has been needed (within the USA) in the last hundred years or so, so whatever might come seems hard to predict.

        I should add that Democrats are also cowards too, as are most individuals - neither side holds a monopoly on that. That’s what makes this all so dangerous: if something could be accomplished behind the scenes, then 99.9999% of Americans will simply go along with the flow. Exactly like within Russia, even the thinnest vernier of respectability would be enough to forestall a large-scale conflict. So the “constitutional crisis” might take the form of a fairly bloodless (in the wider sense) coup.

        Or Republicans could just keep turning the ratchet, making steady gains wherever they can, then locking in those gains and turtling, obstructing as best they can whenever they do not hold a majority, as they have been doing for decades now. In one sense that’s even entirely fair - a democracy should reflect the majority will of the people - except Republicans are aware that white people are becoming in the minority now and so have been changing more and more over time who gets to be counted as “people”. e.g. gerrymandering, with the stacked Supreme Court members not opposing it so now it’s “legal”. Though even that is becoming not enough lately thus they are having to adjust the stakes higher, possibly doing away with voting altogether (yes they are literally talking about that, hence all this discussion about Civil War). They have already been allowed to push that far, which leaves fewer options for them to move forward with short of something drastic.

        The trick is that to the uninitiated, much of it sounds reasonable at first - e.g. “states rights” means that we all get to choose our own paths, and what is wrong with that, isn’t that “freedom” in the truest sense of the word? The trouble is how the lie is delivered along with the truth: for one, the means by which those gains were achieved has enormous implications, which feeds into two, it was actually always a lie bc they never stop there and always push forward after people accept the first push. i.e., if only appeasement would ever actually work! However, like that famous saying “first they came for…”, where even if you don’t care about those first few that were come for, eventually they will come for YOU too, and if you had been paying attention then there would be no need to be shocked, shocked I tell you, shocked! Leopards eat faces off, and just bc one hasn’t eaten YOUR face off, yet, doesn’t mean that it never will. They tend not to change their spots, only their current targets. Like Brexit, many people in the USA won’t know what’s happening anytime before, during, or somehow even after it has happened.:-(

        And some are even joining in with the leopards, neither realizing nor seemingly caring that they are just being saved as future meals for those who are true predators. These “facilitators”, together along with the much more numerous “collaborators”, collectively are bringing literal (neo-)Nazis back into power.

  • Sekrayray@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    11 months ago

    This has to be purposefully not getting media coverage so as to not incite panic/public support, right? When I saw the first ruling posted by Gov Abbott it seemed almost like a secessionist rant, but it’s NO WHERE to be seen in MSM

    • Too Lazy Didn't Name@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d say its not getting coverage because Texas talks about seceding almost every year and states have been using their national guard as political tools for years now.

      When the national guard was sent to DC after the insurrection, Texas pulled their national guard back because of “poor treatment”. I was there, there was no poor treatment. Texas (and several more states afterwards) used their national guard as a political tool to make the other side seem bad.

      • Sekrayray@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Very good point. I’d like to also think it’s not getting attention as to avoid prompting more idiots from joining in on the idiocy, but that’s likely me giving MSM too much credit.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      Attention is what they want. They want drama. They want the illusion of high stakes. We shouldn’t give them what they want.

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Them defying the supreme court is a step they haven’t taken before. It forces Biden to respond or look incredibly weak. Either he allows a red state to actively break federal law and make treasonous statements or he arrests Abbott. It’s not just drama anymore.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s 100% drama. They’ve got you caught up in it.

          No one in the National Guard is going to stop the CBP from cutting the fence down because their pension is on the line. The government of Texas doesn’t control that.

            • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Because the CBP barely tried to access it? I feel like the CBP was just told to wait them out, like a child. Let Texas have a temper tantrum and wait.

              They probably had to wait for the fence cutting equipment anyway. This isn’t the DMZ border with North Korea. If there was a pressing reason to do it, it would have already happened.

              Like I’ve said before, if Biden really wants to access it he could just sign the federalization order at 8 AM EST. All the Guard troops would wake up to a direct order to sit their asses down or lose their pensions. By 10 AM Texas time, the fence would be on the ground or the Guard CO would be unlocking the gate.

              But that’s what Abbott wants to happen so he can escape this dumb situation he created. Biden is trapping him by not taking the bait. Now Texas looks dumb paying money to lose in court. Abbott wants Biden to do something so he can shout “Federal overreach!” and get donations.