m-p{3}@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoAlabama completes first execution by nitrogen asphyxiationwww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square171fedilinkarrow-up1165
arrow-up1165external-linkAlabama completes first execution by nitrogen asphyxiationwww.reuters.comm-p{3}@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square171fedilink
minus-squareshadeless@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up13·8 months agoI’d argue any method of killing a living being against their will is problematic…
minus-squareemptiestplace@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 months agoSure, but that’s not what we are talking about.
minus-squarehips_and_nips@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-28 months agoNo, you’re arguing the decision to kill a living being against their will is problematic, in which I wholehearted agree. To be able to call the method problematic implies you find killing against will acceptable. This particular method (inert gas asphyxiation) is absolutely not problematic when killing people that choose to do so: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarco_pod
I’d argue any method of killing a living being against their will is problematic…
Sure, but that’s not what we are talking about.
No, you’re arguing the decision to kill a living being against their will is problematic, in which I wholehearted agree.
To be able to call the method problematic implies you find killing against will acceptable.
This particular method (inert gas asphyxiation) is absolutely not problematic when killing people that choose to do so: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarco_pod