• Skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s what people don’t seem to get: you can’t have extreme rich without having extreme poor. That’s a baked-in side effect of our current strain of capitalism.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          No it isn’t. There’s nothing stopping us from, for example, growing our own crops and trading them to each other. And we can do that whether or not it’s legal.

          Point in fact, triggering them into outlawing something so harmless would kind of be the point. Then it would force a confrontation they would lose because so many people would be negatively affected – especially the right wing which already does this in their rural communities.

          🤔 Come to think of it, it might be one of the better ways to solve the problem than any other idea anyone has come up with…

            • dick_stitches@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              You don’t have to grow your own crops. You could buy vegetables from a neighbor with a garden, or offer a service. The point is more about subverting the multinational conglomerate machines that drive our current economy

  • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    11 months ago

    I highly doubt that poverty will ever be eradicated, unless we do something like shoot billionaires into the sun once they reach a billion.

    • lechatron@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Congratulations on reaching a billion dollars! Here is your reward, a one way trip to the Sun!”

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        Getting to the sun is actually really, really hard since you have to decrease orbital velocity by a ton. I think guillotines are a much more economical solution.

        With that being said, I’m still onboard with giving it a shot in the name of science.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          One way trip to mars.

          They can have one inflatable habitat with life support, one years supply of food, and some staple crop seeds.

          Use their billion to pay for the launch. Let the billionaires set up the colony or die on a cold barren planet.

          Either way we’ve solved a problem.

      • Cheems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Should just cap out. Like once you get to a certain point the rest of that money is a tax rate of 100% then that money goes into making things better for everyone or a ubi

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nah, I’d rather see something like:

        "Congratulation, we have noticed that you are only earning money as a way to get a better highscore, this means that you gathering further wealth for your own sake is pointless.

        This means that any further wealth you gather will be sent to the usefull projects and organizations where it can do the most good.

        But don’t worry, your wealth highscore will still be recorded as normal.

        By reaching this milestone you can take pride in knowing that you have done amazingly well, and as a mark of this milestone, you will get a statue of yourself in the ‘Hall of financial heroes’ to truly know that you are a great person."

        No need to waste their skills by killing them, just let them keep working doing what they love, but have their work benefit society instead of lining their own pockets.

        You obviously need to stroke their ego and play them up as much as possible, but that is a small price to pay to keep the money train going into society.

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    11 months ago

    Poverty will never be eradicated, what kind of nonsense is that? The poverty is a feature of capitalism, not a bug.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    If a dollar was deposited into you account every SECOND, it would take approximately 32 years to get to just one billion dollars.

    Elon Musk has 180! And he’s the SECOND richest guy on Earth. The richest being Bernard Arnault at 211!!!

    It’s absolutely grotesque to be this filthy rich.

    Also, inb4 “It’S pApEr VaLuE, nOt ReAl MoNeY iN tHe BaNk”. Who cares? You could sell it all and become an international hero by ending all famine, bringing healthcare to everyone and giving shelter to everyone who needs it.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 months ago

    It only makes sense that we collectively eat the first trillionaire.

    Tbh I’d guess that it’s unlikely that we’ll have a trillionaires at all. Hiding wealth will become easier and easier and I don’t think anyone wants that rep in “eat the billionaires” sort of public climate.

    • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      I agree about hiding wealth and all that, but is the public climate actually “eat the billionaires?” Because I basically only see that in left-wing spaces. Normies still seem to be doing a ton of boot licking tbh. I do live in a pretty conservative area though so maybe that’s biased?

      • herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Speaking anecdotally, I’m pretty sure you’re right on that one. In my circle of (millenial / lefty) friends it’s basically seen as common sense. Among the average person I interact with, however, such as at work, it’s seen as a fringe idea. And I’m not even advocating for eating them in the revolutionary sense - just taxing the rich in a way that doesn’t allow any one person/family to horde egregious amounts of wealth to the point that they can unduly influence society with their power.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      We should have eaten the first billionaire. If we stay eating people we definitely didn’t stop as long as there are any billionaires.

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Scientist: poverty will be eradicated in 230 years

      Internet: Actually, it’s 229 years you libtard

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    Poverty will never be eradicated. At no point in human civilization have we managed to eliminate poverty, and as long as there are rich people needing to extract maximum profits from fellow humans there will always be poor people.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Poverty is needed for the rich to be rich. That’s the basic foundation of the system. That was really a dumb report. Except the trillionaire-thing. We will witness that

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    Speaking hypothetically here, what if millions of people just decided that they weren’t to go going to give money to rich people and then those people decided to go to that rich person’s house. Could the problem be fixed quickly this way?

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      If even 10-20% of the workforce just refused to go to work until {list of demands} were met, most businesses and politicians would cave within days/weeks.

      This is why it’s important for capitalism to perpetuate poverty. If the majority had ample savings and were able to survive for months without a paycheque, they would be able to enact change comparatively easily and painlessly, they would be able to refuse and quit shit jobs, they would have time to invest in grass roots movements, campaigns, and protests.

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    We have far greater productivity than at any other point in human history and we still have tons of poverty, even in places like the EU and US. I believe we have the capability but not the willingness. Who’s to say we’ll ever have the willingness.

  • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sweet, I could be a trillonaire by the time poverty will be eradicated. All I have to do is save $498,500 every single hour until then.

          • jballs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s ok. Just keep working hard at pulling yourself up by your bootstraps and I’m sure you’ll get there eventually. Since you’re so close, you should probably start voting against taxes on the rich now. That way you won’t have to worry about the damn greedy welfare queens taking your hard earned money once you’ve made it.

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Hehe capitalism am I right guys?

    Step 1: eat the rich

    Step 2: ???

    Step 3: I didn’t think this far ahead

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      There are literal stacks of left wing literature about steps 2 and 3. Our problem is debating which of the five hundred paths to take is best, not finding just one.

    • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Eating the rich woild be good regardless of anything we do afterwards, they are rich in potassium and other nutrients so I suggest we proceed with the dinner party