• Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope this is his swan song. Patrick Stewart is amazing, and I love Captain Picard, but he’s not Harrison Ford. The franchise will be fine without him. We don’t need to play out Too Short a Season in real life

    • EarMaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      Three seasons of PIC were already a mistake. The only good thing coming from it is the possibility of a Riker cooking/baking show (which I would totally watch).

      • Apollonius_Cone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        In rewatching the original series and TNG thereafter, the consistent factor, regardless of the early special effects, was the scripts. The dialogue was always great. In ST: Picard, the dialogue is trash.

      • Avigrace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        2 seasons were a mistake and by far the worst trek seasons from any show, the third season while being massive fan service was just what I seemingly wanted as I loved every second and was a great ending to the TNG crew

    • ursakhiin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the difference between Stewart and Ford is that Stewart seems more to be doing it because he enjoys this character. Ford seems to be doing it in spite of his feelings.

      As long as Stewart is still having fun, I’m happy with him continuing as long as he wants.

  • darkpanda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I prefer to think that Picard is just still stuck in the Nexus and everything that has happened to him since has been a result of magic Nexus fever dreams.

    Movie Picard and PIC Picard acted nothing like TNG Picard to the point where they were seemingly completely different people. Movie Picard wanted to make the Borg pay for what they did and literally beat in dead Borg with his fists and snapped the Borg queen’s spine in two with his bare hands while TNG Picard knew things weren’t that cut and dry and even had an opportunity to potentially genocide the works of them and didn’t because ethics and shit. Movie Picard would have drove Hugh up to their doorstep infected with the fractal virus the first chance he had.

    PIC Picard… is literally an android I guess? But still old? They kind of ignored that later. So, literally he isn’t the same Picard as TNG Picard.

    The Nexus is my head canon.

    • themoken@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I… Don’t hate this. He meets Kirk too, which could be captain wish fulfillment. After his nephew is killed in such a stupid way he just exits reality and never returns.

      First Contact, like you said, is revenge on the Borg and saving Earth.

      Insurrection is then him inventing the perfect woman to save and finding the fountain of youth.

      Nemesis he fights an evil, young version of himself, which has gotta be worth a few years of therapy.

  • bababooey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will skip this if it gets made. All good things for Picard really came to an end after that episode.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m OK with this, people shit on Star Trek Picard but I still thought it was alright despite the departure from more traditional Trek.

    • VerseAndVermin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I watched the first season and liked it. The fan service didn’t feel so bad (I enjoyed it!). Season twos portrayal by half way through of an old enemy felt too casual to me and I tapped out. Is season 3 worth a whirl of two stopped me?

      • dmonzel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Season 3 is literally just fan service. They reused the V’Ger sound/theme for the enemy. They brought back a character from another show in the franchise. They brought back a character who appeared in two whole episodes of TNG. Large parts of the sound design were lifted from the TNG-era series. Seriously, almost as much fan service as Lower Decks.

        • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly with the train wreck that was Seasons 1 and 2, going full fan service was about the only path forward for the last season. I liked Season 3, but it certainly was NOT original.

          As for Lower Decks…brah…how is Lower Decks fan service? There are references and stuff, but its got its own vibe now going on.

          • dmonzel@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            To be fair, I haven’t watched the latest season of LD, but up to that point, it really was “get this reference? See? Giant Spock’s skeleton! Remember this energy being that escaped the Enterprise-D?” However, I went into LD knowing that that was what I was going to be getting, and while I won’t say it’s my favorite nu-Trek series, I do really enjoy it.

            • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              It definitely has some inside jokery going on and references to other shows, but I’d argue it’s more organically done than just calling it “fan service”. It’s also a comedy SciFi, so I feel like it has more leeway than I’d give most shows, though.

              The show has progressively become it’s own thing as each season progresses, though.

              • dmonzel@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh I in no way meant it as an insult. I love that about LD. I did not love that about PIC.

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The reason I think Lower Decks does a fine job with its “fan service” is that none of those “get this reference? See?” moments matter. They’re just stuff that’s going on in the background, where an ordinary non-Lower-Decks Star Trek show would simply put a bunch of random meaningless gizmos or whatever to fill out the scene. The story that’s being told in the foreground works perfectly well if you don’t “get” any of the references. Often the story is enhanced by those references, but if you watch Lower Decks without any knowledge of the previous shows (aside presumably from a general gist of how shows like Star Trek work) you can still enjoy it.

        • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Season 3 wasn’t amazing, but it certainly wasn’t as awful as Seasons 1 and 2. The scene with the D reveal and the fighting inside the cube was pretty dope, but I’ll admit it was full fan service start to end.

          Seasons 1 and 2 of Picard left me going “WTF how did this story make it out of the writer’s room with approval?” With some editing and reworking it COULD have been good…but it wasn’t.

          And don’t get me started on Discovery. That show has been a Trainwreck forever.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The third season isn’t as good as 1 but its clear and away better than 2 by a huge margin and has some extremely fantastic emotional payoffs.

  • Johannes Jacobs@lemmy.jhjacobs.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    TBH, i never seem to like anything thats made after Voyager or Nemesis. And i understand it, the new movies and new series are made for a different (broader) audience, so it needs splendor and lots of shooting, but to me thats not what Star Trek was about.

    Ive always hoped they’d make a serie with the USS Prometheus, but alas! I’ll just keep rewatching Voyager and DS9 untill i die, i guess.

    • c10l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Strange New Worlds has been quite good tbh.

      Picard has its moments as well. It’s more valuable as a TNG revival than as a whole new ST work but it’s not bad, especially the last season.

      Discovery is one of the worst sci-fi ever produced though, so definitely stay away from it.

      • graded6827@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Glad to see someone else hating on discovery, on the Star Trek subreddit everyone’s obsessed with it and I thought it was hot garbage

        • accideath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I‘d say Discovery has its moments (aka those including Jason Isaacs or Anson Mount) but yea, the Series as a whole is rather bad with an annoying as fuck main character…

        • themoken@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          All of the arguments I see for Discovery are based on representation and that’s literally the only thing the show got right. It’s like yeah, it’s great to have a diverse cast… I just wish they were on screen doing something good. Trek lives and dies in the writing, all the acting, effects, and out of universe concerns won’t save it from absolutely horrendous writing.

          If they’d have done SNW style plots with DSC cast, it would have been amazing from the beginning.

      • Marta Threadbare@masto.ai
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @c10l @johannes idk, Picard S3 ends the same way as Prodigy S1, and Prodigy does it better IMO.

        Discovery started well and got boring by always doing the "galaxy ending thing only us have detected and can solve (something picard does too, but not as many times in a row at least).

  • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I heard only last night about a script that is being written, but written specifically with the actor, Patrick [Stewart], to play in it. And I’ve been told to expect to receive it within a week or so.

    Notably, that week was several weeks ago:

    TrekMovie has confirmed with Josh Horowitz that this interview was recorded in early November as Stewart was out promoting his new memoir, Making It So.

  • Seven@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this thread is anything to go by, me and my other half were the only people on the planet that actually enjoyed Picard S1 and 2, and didn’t like S3 as much.

    In that spirit, if a film is made I look forward to enjoying it even if I’m the only one.

    • astroPug@hachyderm.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      @7of9 @USSBurritoTruck

      I’ll raise my hand and say that I actually enjoyed all three seasons. I felt like 1 and 2 had a sense of melancholy at times, but that was welcome. Kind of felt right at that time in my life.
      3 I really liked for the interpersonal relationships, and that sense of wonder in space.

      • Seven@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, 1 and 2 both dealt with deep themes of grief and generational trauma … I appreciated that they tried to write a story with a deep meaning to it, even if it didn’t 100% work it was better than a lot of the recent things I’ve watched

        • astroPug@hachyderm.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          @7of9

          Yes, I found it resonated with me.

          I was a kid when I first watched TNG reruns, and things seemed safe and optimistic to me. It was also the nature of television to almost reset characters from episode to episode, no matter how difficult or traumatic the previous episode was. (An exception would be the episode where Picard mends fences with his brother and begins facing the trauma of having been assimilated.)

          And I think that was good tv in its own right.

          1/2

          • astroPug@hachyderm.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            @7of9

            But Season 1 Picard took a different approach, and showed Picard dealing with past disillusionment (the loss of his career which was his purpose, et .) in a more long term manner. It wasn’t just gone. And to me, it made sense in the context of my own life. As I aged, I didn’t recover from past hurts quite as quickly either. But we work through it and grow, at any age, and I think that’s what Picard as a character did as well.

            2/more

            • astroPug@hachyderm.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              @7of9

              He’s a different person at that age, definitely more careful, and he’s aware that he doesn’t have all his former health, abilities or status - and that’s ok! He saves people, reconnects (and makes up) with old friends, and has a long-term relationship (maybe?). He’s doing pretty well!

              Plus, he reminded Starfleet and the Federation a little of ideals.

              All that, I found very hopeful and more effective as if neither Starfleet nor Picard had ever met failure.

              Lol, sorry that was long!

              • Seven@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Don’t be sorry for your reply being long, it was clearly well thought out and considered. I agree on all the points you’ve made … perhaps the majority of people here didn’t like Picard 1 & 2 because it wasn’t repeating the type of story telling that Star Trek has typically given, but was a whole new thing. People, generally, don’t like change and I think in the current world there’s comfort to be had in the “monster of the week” style 90s shows.

                • astroPug@hachyderm.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  @7of9

                  Thank you.

                  Yes, I think so, too. Familiarity is comforting, and I also feel that episodic storytelling is comforting, because it’s reminiscent of my childhood, and because it introduces new, interesting concepts but sticks with a familiar structure. I just get value out of the other type of stories as well.

                  I am curious what they’ll do for a Picard movie - or a show of Seven and crew.

    • ursakhiin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I enjoyed all 3 seasons of Picard. I’ll likely enjoy this movie. It’s always a joy to see Patrick Stewart in a dramatic role.

      • Seven@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, I’m glad it wasn’t just me, lol … I figured some people must have enjoyed it otherwise they’d have left it at one season!

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I liked all 3, 3 being hit or miss but overall enjoyable for me. Season 2 had a lot of fun parts

      • Seven@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing I liked with 1 and 2 was that they both tried to tackle big ideas of past trauma, even if it didn’t come out well the big thinking was in there while a lot of recent things I’ve watched has felt skin deep at best

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    i will always love a new picard movie since i have memories of watching tng with my dad and i loved picard but i still want them to make star trek legacy

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know they have to use the bridge a lot more than one single episode. It was always part of the plan.

  • ulkesh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this is great and anything I can see Patrick Stewart in, I will. I don’t share the opinion that Picard series was bad. I don’t see Picard as a one-dimensional must always be the same character. People change over time. And Picard has also changed. Like it or not.

    Bring on the movie!

  • SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have two reasons to not write this off:

    1. Picard S2 would have been just fine as a 2-or-3-part episode, and not a 10-episode full season.
    2. The first 4 episodes of Picard S3, watched together by themselves, become the second-best TNG movie (after First Contact of course).

    If they were announcing Picard season 4 I’d just groan and ignore it. But I think the cast and crew could actually pull off a decent 1.5-2 hours of good entertainment.