I feel like over the past few months, the main thing preventing me from getting super active in the fediverse has been all of the drama surrounding federation and instances shutting down.

I just want to be able to turn my brain off, and not have to think “Will this instance be around in 6 months?” every time I post.

As a result, I’ve been thinking about creating a Lemmy and/or Mastodon instance that is literally just me and no one else. No communities or anything, simply me posting to other instances via this private instance. And I know that this instance will stay alive and federated for as long as I keep hosting it.

However before I go through the effort of setting these up, I want to know what people think about private instances. Is this bad taste? Is it a logistical nightmare? Have people done this before? And what would the hardware requirements for a 1 user instance look like?

  • Spaceman Spiff@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are plenty of people that do this, and it seems to be pretty straightforward.

    There is a significant risk going forward though- if the undesirables (the ones that currently get larger instances defederated) start doing this in any major way, then the larger instances will block new federation or smaller instances by default. Starting now is actually probably a good move, since you might be grandfathered in when that occurs.

    Also, be aware of local laws regarding content you host. You could be liable for illegal content you inadvertantly receive.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s inevitable; I imagine that in the future there will be an application and vetting process if you want to federate with a major instance, as most users will not be interested in running their own instances, and your federation can be a source of work for the mods/admins.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why would there be a consensus? You don’t need anyone else’s permission to run whatever sort of instance you like.

    • testsnakeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fair enough! I’ve just gotten used to an internet where you’ll get into drama for sneezing the wrong way so I wanted to make sure there wasn’t any weird taboo around it.

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The impression I get is that personal instances are part of what is intended.

    If you can, go for it. It’s not rude, and no one should care or even really notice.

    I’ve been thinking of doing the same thing.

  • The common term for this is “single user instance” and they’re not at all uncommon.

    I’m replying to you from my single user microblog.pub instance. It actually only works for a doctor user, and I’ve really liked it since I’ve started it.

    I have no problems interacting with Mastodon, Pleroma, Misskey, etc. instances. It works with Lemmy as well as Mastodon does (which is to say, it works ok with Lemmy, but not ideal).

    It uses a SQLite database, so, on my computer, I need Python to run the server, and nginx/caddy/Apache to proxy requests and handle https.

    There are a few downsides. I host at home, so if my Internet goes down (which it does periodically), it’s down. Also, Mastodon lets you follow hashtags, but that is somewhat useless on a single user instance, since all the posts coming in are from people I follow. Search is non-existent for me, since, again, it only knows about people and posts I’ve already interacted with.

    I have a Lemmy account to do most of my interaction with Lemmy, and a Mastodon account on a somewhat large instance for searching, and for periodically browsing its local feed. But mostly, I spend my time on my own instance, and an very happy with it.

    @testsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone @asklemmy@lemmy.ml

  • czech@no.faux.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its been working well for me with kbin. Over the last week, while the large instances struggled to stay up and federating, my instance constantly had new content coming in from whoever was still up.

  • 8565@lemmy.quad442.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly in my opinion that’s how federation should work. Everyone should have their own instance of social media and they all talk together

    • TheFogan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean short and long term there’s pros and cons to that. however there’s a reason why that started to fall appart with e-mail. In short if it gets popular, than hosting servers with no throttling or post limits means spammers are going to go crazy, and rather than play the never ending unwinnable whack a mole game as bad actors create thousands of instances a day, hosts of any instances worth targetting will have to do a “instances are assumed malicious until proven benign”, (IE a whitelist method)

  • kehalo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I host my own Mastodon instance. If you’re technically proficient enough and don’t mind the extra work, I highly recommend it.

    I am hosting mine for the same reason you’re considering it: I don’t want my stuff to disappear and I want to be in control of my own social media destiny as much as possible.

    Now, there are some headaches I haven’t seen mentioned here, so let me toss some things out for you:

    1. Until someone follows you on an instance, no one else there will know you exist. Meaning, no one on, say, mastodon.social will see your post tagged with a hashtag—or you generally—until at least one person on the instance follows you.
    2. You will not have an easy time seeing people post history before you start following them because your server doesn’t know about them.
    3. Following hashtags is…not super helpful because your instance isn’t ingesting a lot of data.

    You may be thinking, bro, that sucks.

    And you’d not be wrong, except for the fact that you’re the admin of your own server and you can do whatever you want with it. So, head on over to GitHub and fork

    1. Fedifetcher. This will ingest alllllllll sorts of stuff for you. Backfill new follows and followers, boosted and favorited threads etc.
    2. GetMoarFediverse. This will allow you to define hashtags and instances or query your db and have the content ingested. Want to see all the posts from #food from mastodon.social? No big deal.

    I’d suggest, if tech savvy enough to go with digitalocean and just admin the whole server yourself, but bump up one level in ram instead of going with a managed hosting solution with less control.

    Feel free to message with questions if you have them!

  • Caboose20@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know a few people who have done this with Mastodon and it works quite well so far. Just like email, it doesn’t really matter where it’s hosted as long as it’s being respectful and not sending out spam.

    That being said, AFAIK you can’t transfer a Lemmy account between instances yet, so if you ever change your mind and want to move to another instance, you may have to create a new account.

  • kehalo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I host my own Mastodon instance. If you’re technically proficient enough and don’t mind the extra work, I highly recommend it.

    I am hosting mine for the same reason you’re considering it: I don’t want my stuff to disappear and I want to be in control of my own social media destiny as much as possible.

    Now, there are some headaches I haven’t seen mentioned here, so let me toss some things out for you:

    1. Until someone follows you on an instance, no one else there will know you exist. Meaning, no one on, say, mastodon.social will see your post tagged with a hashtag—or you generally—until at least one person on the instance follows you.
    2. You will not have an easy time seeing people post history before you start following them because your server doesn’t know about them.
    3. Following hashtags is…not super helpful because your instance isn’t ingesting a lot of data.

    You may be thinking, bro, that sucks.

    And you’d not be wrong, except for the fact that you’re the admin of your own server and you can do whatever you want with it. So, head on over to GitHub and fork

    1. Fedifetcher. This will ingest alllllllll sorts of stuff for you. Backfill new follows and followers, boosted and favorited threads etc.
    2. GetMoarFediverse. This will allow you to define hashtags and instances or query your db and have the content ingested. Want to see all the posts from #food from mastodon.social? No big deal.

    I’d suggest, if tech savvy enough to go with digitalocean and just admin the whole server yourself, but bump up one level in ram instead of going with a managed hosting solution with less control.

    Feel free to message with questions if you have them!

  • The Eldritch Rain@an.eldritch.gift
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @testsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone Private instances are perfectly fine! There is nothing wrong with wanting to explore the Fediverse on an instance that is yours and yours alone!

    For context though, I am biased towards self-hosting. I am running the private Calckey instance I am replying from, I’ve ran a private Akkoma instance before, and I am running a low user Kbin instance.

    Generally speaking, the resources required to host a private Fediverse instance are low. You could likely get an instance running on the equivalent of a Raspberry Pi! (Would recommend getting as much RAM as possible though) Though, some instances are harder to initialise than others! Akkoma and Calckey are a breeze to set up, but Kbin is a nightmare if you don’t know what you’re doing (or, Docker-wise if you don’t use the V2 docker instructions). Luckily, the Fediverse tends to be a nice place, so there is help to be found if you find yourself stuck somewhere!

  • GuyDudeman@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess the question is whether or not federation is automatic. If it’s manual, then every instance you want to interact with will have to federate with your instance.