PHOENIX (AP) – The 2024 presidential election is drawing an unusually robust field of independent, third party and long shot candidates hoping to capitalize on Americans’ ambivalence and frustration over a likely rematch between Democrat Joe Biden and Republican Donald Trump.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    How about this… don’t take a guy who quietly supports genocide, whose been part of politics longer than I’ve been alive- in fact he’s been a senator for more than twice as long as I’ve been a voter- and make him the canidate.

    Because, under your argument, that’s just giving voted to trump!!!

    “Vote blue no matter who” is an argument that presupposes a good canidate is in office. Biden is not a good candidate; and the dems need to find somebody else to run him.

    We saw the same problem with Hilary. Hilary was not a good canidate and in no way was actually capable of winning. You made the same arguments then as now.

    You know Biden is going to lose votes. Why the fuck are you unwilling to consider someone else?

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do whatever the fuck you want to do, bro. When the day comes, you’ll have one of several bubbles to fill out, and you’ll make the choice you were gonna make anyway. Either you vote strategically for whoever has the best chance to ensure Trump doesn’t make it anywhere near the White House, or you vote for whoever makes you feel good, knowing Trump might win. If a second Trump presidency doesn’t scare you now, it won’t do anything different in a year. If Biden’s the nominee, I’ll crawl through a mine field covered in broken glass to vote for him. If he’s not, I’ll do the same for whoever the party nominates to replace him.

      • dvoraqs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hopefully enough others will vote anyway out of a sense of duty, but non-enthusiastic energy for a candidate will keep some people from going out to vote at all. That is actually a third default choice that takes no energy to do.

        • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know what point you’re trying to make. If you told me to swim through a pit of jellyfish to keep Trump away from the White House, I would swim through the fucking jellyfish. Others might chicken out so they can eat cheetos and watch Paw Patrol. Fuck them.

          • don@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right beside you, fellow jellyfish-eater. Right beside you.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know what point you’re trying to make. If you told me to swim through a pit of jellyfish to keep Trump away from the White House, I would swim through the fucking jellyfish.

            Others may not, and Biden may lose without them.

            • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I get the worry, but in all honesty if they haven’t been absolutely terrified by Trump’s rhetoric over the past 7 years, what the fuck else are we supposed to say to convince them? Biden may lose without them. He may also win with them. Your observation seems like an assessment of the wetness of water. It’s a statement of fact with little substance.

                • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s quite literally not what I’m saying, even if you squint REAL hard. Here, I’ll repeat the question for those in the back row:

                  if they haven’t been absolutely terrified by Trump’s rhetoric over the past 7 years, what the fuck else are we supposed to say to convince them?

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    what the fuck else are we supposed to say to convince them?

                    Repeat yourself again. I’m sure that’ll work.

        • APassenger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve made this point here in the past. It’s a solid point. Wish it didn’t lead to down votes.

          If a person isn’t well off, has poor ballot situations and a kid to tend to… their enthusiasm matters when that next logistical hurdle appears on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

    • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Biden is a good candidate. He hasn’t been impeached yet, unlike his competitor during this same time in his term; he hasn’t started a coup on his own country, and the fact that he’s experienced at the job he’s applying to is actually a good thing (displayed by the passing of both the CHIPs act and the IRA despite not having complete control of congress). Hilary was actually a significantly better candidate than Trump(very obvious in hindsight for many), but Trump had the advantage of Russian support and the fact that it was uncertain how he would act as president. Once voters found out how Trump is as a president, they turned away from him in droves as evidenced by the fact that he’s the first president to lose reelection in 20 years, and Republicans have lost every election since Trump was voted in.

      Biden ain’t perfect, but man he’s a huge upgrade compared to Trump.

        • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No,these are just some very simple, and objective comparisons that can be made because the alternative is someone literally below the bar that is in hell.

          CHIPS ACT, Inflation Reduction Act, supporting unions are some more important things Biden has assisted with.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah he’s better than a literal facist who is currently making Nazi speeches and has promised to jail all his political opponents. What an incredibly high bar for Biden to stumble over!

        Having your party position be “Bite your tongue and vote for our shit candidate to prevent the end of democracy” is not a winning position. It’s a terrible strategy guaranteed to lead to less voter turnout.

        • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          People voted for Biden during the primary election. We had Bernie, Warren, Pete and others who LOST to Biden so many Democrats feel he was better than others. Biden is a good candidate minus his age, which becomes slightly irrelevant compared to Trump. Biden has been aggressive in talking about how he has been supporting job creation,unions and getting laws passed despite the current GOP. The “Bite your tongue…” Argument is one of many Biden has (and doesn’t like to use because it of course doesn’t look as great as others)

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Biden is a good candidate. He hasn’t been impeached yet, unlike his competitor during this same time in his term; he hasn’t started a coup on his own country, and the fact that he’s experienced at the job he’s applying to is actually a good thing (displayed by the passing of both the CHIPs act and the IRA despite not having complete control of congress). Hilary was actually a significantly better candidate than Trump(very obvious in hindsight for many), but Trump had the advantage of Russian support and the fact that it was uncertain how he would act as president. Once voters found out how Trump is as a president, they turned away from him in droves as evidenced by the fact that he’s the first president to lose reelection in 20 years, and Republicans have lost every election since Trump was voted in.

        Biden ain’t perfect, but man he’s a huge upgrade compared to Trump.

        lets break that down a bit here. your argument is in 3 parts:

        • Biden is not Trump
        • Biden is “experienced”
        • and Biden managed to take care of business.

        Point one applies to literally every one whose not trump; and even if go so far as to be ‘not-trump-like’, that would include a fair number of Republicans, too. It’s not an argument that should be seriously made when deciding who the Democratic candidate should be… because it’s pretty much a given.

        Point two… that’s also an argument against. He’s been in the senate for longer than I’ve been alive. We need change. we don’t need the same washed up and tired ideas. Biden’s functional policies have only grudgingly changed. for example, if he wanted to legalize weed, he could have. He could have chosen to not open up Willow Project- like he had (indirectly) promised to not do. further, he’s only had what? 12 years experience in the excecutive branch? and 8 as second fiddle. his record there is pretty uninspiring, to be honest. You’re welcome to disagree.

        point three- has Biden accomplished a lot? compared to trump? absolutely. Trump left this country in a shambles and Biden helped pick up the pieces. Helped- he was far from alone in that. and the CHIPS act is largely a no-brainer bill. same goes for the IRA and the infrastructure act. before trump came to office, all of them would have been hailed as modest bits of normalcy. Big bills? sure. Important? absolutely. but nothing worth bragging about.

        It should be noted that most VBNW-type people are only pushing the first argument. Which is intellectually dishonest and a scare tactic. Virtually any one capable of being the democratic canidate is not trump, and is a far cry from trumpism. especially the actual progressives. we can talk about what Biden has done, and his policy decisions and where he’s propelled the country to. but from where I sit, most of his accomplishments are full of half measures.

        Like, he kept the ship from listing more, and he’s bailing his hardest, but, the ship ain’t righting and it’s still leaking.

        • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If we’re talking about candidate for president, then easily Biden is the best choice. Why would the DNC even think about not picking Biden as the candidate when Americans voted him in already, and he hasn’t shit the bed? Not only that, this is a literal repeat of the election Biden won, against the exact same opponent with the EXACT same platform and message. I should emphasize, Trump LOST his reelection something that hasn’t happened since HW Bush in '92 and yet Trump lost because he was so bad. So here we are a president running for reeelection in which there’s a history of presidents mainly winning their reelection campaigns. It seems like a no brainer, run Biden unless he messes up soon (since closer to election time, the calculus becomes harder to figure out).

          In regards to my point 2, We tried something new with Trump and it was a train wreck. Having experience for a job is always a plus, when compared to someone that knows nothing/very little. I agree Biden isn’t exactly my cup of tea (voted for Bernie), but he’s not crap compared to other Democrats, and against Trump there’s not contest. But we’re passed deciding whether we need to change out Biden, that decision point was back during the primary.

          Point three, Neither of those bills are modest and especially not with the current political atmosphere. Some R politicians are literally saying that Biden stole the election and has committed impeachable actions, they’ve been acting and voting with that in mind. The CHIPs act voted with overwhelming republican disapproval. So doesn’t seem like a no brainer decision for Republicans which makes it rather surprising that it passed in general. Same thing with the Inflation Reduction Act which is the biggest spending bill for the environment for US and world history. Republicans overwhelming voted against it in the House and Senate as well.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            and he hasn’t shit the bed?

            • WIllow Project (oil drilling project in alaska)
            • Palestine
            • student loan debt (well, there’s some progress on it, but its far from complete.); cost of tuition. 0
            • Dreamers.
            • Immigration reform. Customs detention facilities. dealing with the asylum crisis.
            • Policing reform.
            • codifying Roe v. Wade.
            • Housing costs; and other debt.
            • Core inflation has come down, but the kind of inflation people feel on a daily basis hasn’t (Food and energy paramount here.)

            Seriously, compared to any ex-president other than trump, and at best he’s “Meh”.

            The CHIPs act voted with overwhelming republican disapproval. So doesn’t seem like a no brainer decision for Republicans which makes it rather surprising that it passed in general. Same thing with the Inflation Reduction Act which is the biggest spending bill for the environment for US and world history. Republicans overwhelming voted against it in the House and Senate as well.

            Yep. because they’re the party of shitting themselves and blaming democrats. the point being, though, that while Biden did a fair amount of heavy lifting there- he didn’t do all the heavy lifting. Those bills aren’t exclusively biden’s win.

        • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like, he kept the ship from listing more, and he’s bailing his hardest, but, the ship ain’t righting and it’s still leaking.

          Half of the passengers are actively shooting holes into the ship. I don’t think there’s a human alive that could right it. There is no Ideal Candidate who can fix all these problems in one term - probably not even in two. So I don’t get why we’re holding Biden to this impossible standard where conservatives create problems faster than anyone can solve them, but then we hold Biden solely responsible for the both the cleanup and the progress we should have made in the meantime, but then we also won’t afford him the benefit of “helping.” In your words, “he was far from alone in that,” well why should he be?

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            He shouldn’t be alone, obviously.

            The question isn’t whether or not some one is ideal. Or if they could right the ship- you’re right that’s basically impossible.

            The question is… can some one do a better job? And I think the answer is yes. Now is not the time to play it safe. Hilary was the “safe” play and she lost. And she wasn’t responsible for supporting a genocidal state. (Well she might have done in biden’s shoes,)

            Now is the time to come out swinging, because that’s the only way we’re going to get back to where we should be. Biden isn’t going to lead that charge because he’s as conservative as centrist republicans were 20 years ago, and under him… he’s kept us from getting worse (more or less,). But that’s it.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why the fuck are you unwilling to consider someone else?

      Is this your first election? Incumbency advantage and name recognition. Anyone who understands that and continues to make excuses to not vote for Biden is a Trump supporter. Either intentionally or through sheer privileged ignorance.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anyone who understands that and continues to make excuses to not vote for Biden is a Trump supporter. Either intentionally or through sheer privileged ignorance. Save your preaching for the full election next year. After which I will be angrily telling you I said so.

        missing the point, and instead going straight to the fucking insults. POINT: Biden as a candidate sucks. nobody is saying Biden is actually their preferred candidate. he’s deeply unpopular and becoming increasingly so, and yet, you’re sitting here blaming people WARNING you about that… instead of maybe shopping around for another candidate- IN THE FREAKING PRIMARIES?

        we’re winding up for another repeat of 2016, because people like you won’t get off their fucking high horse and actually listen to people. and you have the fucking gall to accuse ME of sheer privileged ignorance. Incidentally, I’ve had his exact same conversation with people, only about Hilary.

        Oh and your point about incumbency… yeah, that’s increasingly becoming the millstone about his neck, Biden is far from the best, and he could be using what little positive influence he has now for supporting another candidate- LIKE HE FREAKING PROMISED LAST TIME.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your choice is between President Biden, who has been a good President or the Antichrist. There isn’t anyone else running that is worth my time to look at. Your argument should wait until 2028 when Pete Buttigieg is the top candidate. Probably the most intelligent member of the Federal Government right there.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Appeal to fear is a logical fallacy and marketing gimmick.

        We can and should do better. All I hear is “You’ll vote the way we tell you, and you’ll like it.”

        To which my only response is “Okay, Boomer.”

        • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Consitution was written to support a two party system. You can change the game without a Consitutional Amendment.