what os could be resistant to o.mg and rubber ducky

openBSD?

windows NT 3.1?

palm os?

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any operating system that supports a usb keyboard is vulnerable. In theory maybe you could limit the vulnerability by blocking all but one keyboard but I don’t know of anything that does that

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty much this.

      They behave like standard HID devices unless they’re scripted to emulate something else, like say a network interface… not really a feasible thing to fullt mitigate, and probably not worth worrying about IMO unless you’re a bank or something

  • Cralder@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any OS is resistant if you disable the usb ports but other than that there is not much you can do. Just dont plug in random cables or usb sticks into your computer

  • Nawor3565
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you asking this in a theoretical, “just for fun” sort of way? If so, any OS that is too old to support USB would be resistant, such as AmigaOS. Otherwise, there really isn’t anything you can do to protect against those types of devices short of completely disabling USB altogether.

  • brokenlcd@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you are on a unix machine you should be able to use duckhunt. When it detects a keyboard typing too fast it logs it and blocks the keyboard until either the attack is over or you input a password, depending on the settings; i’m not sure if that is the original repo though