• Microw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    1 year ago

    What always bugs me about this is that they had the boys in underwear. Like, if it’s fine to symbolize with clothed girls, why do you need to do it differently with boys?

    • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      100% with ya, the double standards are kinda crazy. The differnce between the first two panels is pretty stark in regards to the kid, even if the point is essentially the same.

      My take is that male bodies need to exposed in order to be sexualized so they read vulnerable, but female bodies are can be read as sexualized and vulnerable regardless how they are presented. But that doesn’t really explain panel 4 & 6.

      Weird choices. If anyone knows who the artist is, I’d be curious how they would talk about this.

      • credit crazy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        With the priest it makes sense to me considering they are infomas for being pedophiles but the rest yea why couldn’t they have been clothed

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Especially since #1 and #2 are both instances of sexual violence.

          I’d have dresses #1 in a choir boy outfit, #4 in a hospital johnny, and #6 can wear whatever honestly.

    • Rukmer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like almost all of it is blatantly obvious everyone the surgeon with the cooler, since I’m not aware of any child organ harvesting epidemic (and I maybe don’t want to be).

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Prob some anti-medicine/ pharma/ vax or other conspiracy stuff. Organ harvesting from children isn’t a thing, unless that’s the conspiracy and we’re right back where we started.

      The only reasonable thing I can think of is lack of access to healthcare, and I guess insurance people and lobbyists don’t have uniforms so they went with a doctor.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Child organ trafficking is much rarer than sexual, but very much a thing that exists. Conspiracies may exaggerate, but don’t make the mistake of dismissing the existence entirely as a consequence

  • Franzia
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dog I think this is just about pedophilia or which children each person figuratively hurts?

  • anar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kind of fucked up that the child in the bottom right has to pose for something he’s already experiencing

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really unsure about the symbolism here. Didn’t Jesus die on the cross for our sins to be forgiven or something along those lines? So this kinda implies the abused children die to give forgivness to the people they are nailed to here…

    Please correct me if I’m wrong, I’ve never been to a church and neither has anyone I know.

    • FancyManacles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even in religious circles the forgiveness part is normally left out. The phrase often repeated is “Jesus died for your sins” without any mention of forgiveness. Since that is the common turn of phrase then this depicts children suffering/dying because of the sins of someone else.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dont understand the middle one in the upper row and the left one in the bottom row. The rest are pretty obvious to me.

      • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe but the bottom left looks like an organ transporting container and i dont think they use that for abortions. But ig its art even tho i dont agree with everything it represents.

        • Pandawhiskers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure if it’s photo clarity, but it does kind of look to me like the boy has stitched up cavity down his center

    • door_in_the_face@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bottom left looks like forced organ harvesting? Not sure how often that actually happens to children, but the world is a fucked up place so it’s possible I suppose.

      • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        That kid is way too young for organ harvesting though. Most of the demand for organs is from adults who need adult sized organs and kid organs won’t keep growing in a body that’s long stopped producing all the hormone indicators to signal for growth.

        or… or, so I’m told.

      • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        But what’s the context? I’m completely unaware that doctors were murdering or sacrificing children to steal their organs.