Lawmakers could vote for infrastructure bill, then buy stock in a concrete firm.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      No they don’t. They can buy the stock before the vote, knowing which way the vote is gonna go.

      Senators do communicate with each other on these things, even exchange votes (eg: I’ll vote for this if you vote for that). That’s before we get into the matter of party whips pressing members to vote certain ways. None of that is public record.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The example was someone who bought after voting. So at least that doesn’t seem to present a problem.

        If someone knows a bill is coming up that is likely to pass, they too can buy the stock before the vote.

        If nobody knows whether it will pass besides the legislator, then yeah that’s totally insider trading. Which is already illegal.

        But frankly that’s a pretty rare situation. Legislators usually telegraph well in advance how they are going to vote for upcoming bills. And when the outcome is a surprise, it usually surprises the legislators too.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If nobody knows whether it will pass besides the legislator, then yeah that’s totally insider trading. Which is already illegal.

          Correct. The problem is that it’s not enforced on senator’s as they don’t want to indict their fellow congressperson

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Sure, but if that’s true then banning it with another law won’t change anything.

            • 520@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Correct. It’s the enforcement of the law that needs to change.

              Specifically, enforcement needs to be automated, rather than relying on someone in the political game manually pulling the trigger. Because that someone at the moment has every politics reason not to, thus enforcement is the exception and not the norm