• EarWorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I drive, I am one with my vehicle! I have the gear stick up my ass and twerk to change gears, like a MAN!

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And of course all shit electric cars are all automatic. It’s part of the NWO agenda. They want to force us all into electric, automatic cars, Over my dead body! A car that does not produce smelly fumes when driving is not a real car. What I am supposed to smell when walking in the city? Air? Fucking dumb. On top of that they make no sound! There’s nothing to tune up to make my car sound like a racing machine. How I’m supposed to let everyone know I have a small dick if I can’t rev my engine all the time? Not to mention electric cars don’t emit CO2 so I can’t lock myself in a garage with the engine running and kill myself when I realize that no one is impressed by my car and my dick is still tiny. Absurd!

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve literally seen people post that they’d consider going electric if only it had an engine sound. Seriously, people who are old enough to have a drivers license want their car to go wroom wroom.

      I get it. It’s the same reason all cars have a steering wheel, despite it being the most dangerous part of the interior. Joysticks just don’t give the same feel as when the captain steers the boat over the seven seas.

      Wroom wroom, steer steer, wroooom, change gear while turning, push pedal, wroom wroom.

      • Juki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        1 year ago

        Steering wheels are enormous because that allows fine grain control, which you need at higher speeds. Switching lane at 70mph requires only very slight movement but turning the car around in a street you can go full lock.

        A joystick would be fucking TERRIFYINGLY stupid lmao

        • filcuk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Some vehicles use steering by wire, which uses motors for i/o. This allows for steering sensitivity adjustments based on speed or even* preference.

          • Juki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            True, but sensitivity is only half the story - the direct feedback of a wheel cannot be overstated

            • filcuk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re right, but that should be part of the system.
              There is virtually no noticeable lag.
              The same technology is used by F1 vehicles, for example.

        • hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fundamentally a joystick is a device that gives input in 2 dimensions, while steering a car is a 1 dimensional input.

              • Programmer Belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                While a wheel is more familiar to me, I don’t think it has many advantages over a speed modulated joystick, just make it as big as a hand so that you can have a hand for the joystick and lights and another for the gear stick, maybe put the control of the lights on the joystick if its more convenient

                • hglman@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But cars move in an arc, the turning of the wheel is an extremely good analog for the cars movement. I really disagree and I submit that no one uses a joystick for sim racing, if it was better ppl would have latched on. You need the force feedback and control that comes with grasping a wheel and having the lever moment that a wheel gives. A joy stick has no mechanical advantage.

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          No it’s not terribly stupid. Handicapped people already use other controllers without any issues.

          A steering wheel is already electronically adjusted for speed. The servo will work just as well regardless of the controller device.

          Along with lane assistance and other “self driving cars” it should be pretty evident that there is nothing dangerous about giving up the physical turny wheely kindergarten toy controller.

          • Juki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s not just about precision, it’s about feedback. Being directly connected with the steering linkage gives valuable feedback about the road and the front wheels - just because handicapped people have an alternative that they may use out of necessity does not mean it’s a better solution.

            In a fully autonomous car, sure perhaps a simple manual system as a backup makes sense but we aren’t there yet. You are talking absolute nonsense, and I can only assume you haven’t ever driven a vehicle.

      • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean the wheel is definitely the best control mechanism for driving… whether or not it’s dangerous, there’s a reason the best sim racers use wheels and not controllers and it’s that they provide vastly more control. So nice argument except it’s all based on a false claim that joysticks are better lmaoooo

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s just a matter of getting used to it. Something like a playstation controller would be easy to learn for most people. People who play racing games seriously wouldn’t use a wheel and pedals. It’s just too slow.

          • Sprucie@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            But in a racing game the wheels can also twist from hard lock left to hard lock right in a millisecond, not sure that’s possible or desired in real life

          • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            People who play racing games seriously wouldn’t use a wheel and pedals. It’s just too slow.

            That is not true at all, unless the racing game is NFS or something. The people seriously playing racing sims all use wheels and pedals.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Something like a playstation controller would be easy to learn for most people.

            I mean, you can steer a submarine with it, am I right?

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I was extraordinarily glad to have a wheel when my power steering failed and found myself having to turn the car using the strength of my arms and the mechanical leverage of the wheel. A joystick would’ve made the vehicle literally impossible to steer.

      • axsyse@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll just leave this here. In short: a guy wrote a physics engine to simulate any combustion engine, and then further got it working with an electric motor so electric motors can use a simulated vroom vroom

        https://youtu.be/4U41OxHiqI8

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve literally seen people post that they’d consider going electric if only it had an engine sound.

        In many regions now it’s actually mandated that EVs make additional noise when moving at low speeds (less than 40km/h or so). There were concerns that quiet vehicles would have more pedestrian accidents.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      electric cars are all automatic

      They aren’t, really. They don’t actually change gears, if you want to go backwards you spin the motor backwards.

      Hilariously, jump starting EVs is a thing if the 12V battery dies. And no, you can’t roll start them.

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        And no, you can’t roll start them.

        I imagine you “can”, it’s just not very effective. Like, if they allowed you to switch it to regenerative breaking and let it roll down a hill. The problem is you can’t get out any more energy than you put in. So if the battery is dead and you roll down the hill you won’t be able to rull any farther up the other side than you started (even less when you factor in mechanical -> electrical -> mechanical. You’d probably better off putting it in neutral [if that’s a thing for electric cars] and just let it roll)

        • zurohki@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, you actually can’t.

          For safety reasons, the 400V main battery isn’t hardwired to the car. There’s a couple of contactors powered by the 12V battery that connect it to the car.

          If your 12V battery dies, the contactors open and the car is completely dead. You have to jump it or replace the 12V battery, then the contactors pull in, then the main battery can start charging the 12V.

          Even plugging it in doesn’t work - the car won’t take a charge if the electronics are dead.

          If the main battery is dead but the 12V hasn’t died yet, you can try regenning down a hill or plugging in or whatever. But if you lose the 12V, the car’s bricked.

          It’s set up that way so that first responders can get to an accident, pop the hood, cut the 12V and then start cutting you out of the wreckage without worrying about high voltage cables.

          • bitwaba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, obviously there’s technical reasons why. I was just approaching the problem theoretically. And then showing why the theory is stupid. It makes sense that they would implement other things for safety, especially if avoiding them only enabled a completely useless solution to a dead battery.

      • axsyse@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        tl;dr: my PHEV does change gears when in EV mode, as weird as it sounds

        So, I drive a Hyundai Ioniq Plug-in Hybrid EV (PHEV). It’s a hybrid with a larger battery so you can plug it in and drive fully-EV on the battery for about 30 miles/50 kilometers or so. The freaky thing is that the EV motor is connected to the transmission, so it does switch gears sometimes and you can feel it when it does. Even freakier is that this also applies to regenerative braking: when you slow down from a high speed, you can sometimes feel it switching gears while you brake. That all isn’t too bad since it’s got a dual-clutch transmission and so it switches gears pretty quickly, but it can still be a bit freaky at times.

        Additionally: there are some people who have converted antique cars to EVs, but to save money they didn’t touch the transmission and instead elected only to replace the engine. They still have manual transmissions in them, though I suppose you could probably just find a suitable gear to leave them on 100% of them time. Still, you can, in principle, switch gears on them.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Typically I’ve seen people keep their car in 2nd (or reverse IIRC? That way your controller doesn’t have to support reverse and you don’t have to put in a new switch on the dash) in electric swaps. Also you don’t use the clutch pedal to start, only to change gears, which is a bit freaky when you’re not used to it.

          On the highway there might be value in switching to a higher gear though, torque/efficiency curves aren’t perfectly flat even on electric motors. I would be curious to know what gains would be had on a modern electric platform like an ID.3 if one was to put in a cheap two or three gears sequential/manual transmission (for all I know the efficiency gains would not offset the additional losses from the clutch and gearbox, and even if they are some gains I’m sure that they do not make up for the inconvenience/lack of comfort of a MT).

    • doofer_name@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Over my dead body!

      Be careful now. The German car and American gun industry might listen and team up.

    • credit crazy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly the only issue I have with electric car sound, is that in the country side animals, listin for your engine. So silent electric cars make it all the more likely that your gonna hit a bear. I’m not even asking for them to be deafeningly loud. Other than that my only problem with electric cars in general, is that they are soo overall boring. The Tesla models are just generic car design smoothed over. At least the Prius has a neat double rear windshield. Honestly the only electric car I’ve been thinking of getting, are those new 2cevs that are being reproduced, but electric. The only fun cool cars being made today are Supras and Miatas. Everything made in America just looks like a blow up car thats about to burst. Drm just worsens them further because now I can’t mod or enjoy fixing them. Electric cars are just infuriating because they are just a battery connected to some motors. The complicated part is a fuckin computer chip why is everything sealed. All this effort for a car that looks like a car shaped cum blob.

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly the only issue I have with electric car sound, is that in the country side animals, listin for your engine. So silent electric cars make it all the more likely that your gonna hit a bear. I’m not even asking for them to be deafeningly loud.

        Mentioned this in another comment, but many regions now mandate that EVs have noisemakers built in which emit sound at low speeds (<40km/h or so).

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_vehicle_warning_sounds

      • Voyajer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apparently all the deer around me are fuckin deaf going by what cares I’ve seen hit them.

        • credit crazy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I suppose different places have different animals. But in my home state at least, deer were only a problem when my folks got a f150. That ironically enough was extremely quiet. It was easily my familys most quite vehicle we had. And it was the only vehicle that had deer jumping in front of it and even hit a bear.

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I for one think that cars should be boring. And safe. Safe and boring. You want a fun car? Go to a racing track. You’re on a public road, sharing it with responsible people? Drive responsibly. Be boring. Shitload of people would still be alive today of everyone had a boring car and drove in a boring way.

        • credit crazy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree because when we look at places like the Netherlands were they have driving alternatives ie bike, train and walk. Driving becomes more fun and the only people on the road are people who ether like driving or traveling long distances and driving accidents plumit. Compair that to amarica where driving is already boring, we have aggressive drivers, drunk driver and irresponsible drivers, and we have greater amounts of accidents. Because people who don’t enjoy driving are forced to drive and people who do enjoy driving have nowhere to go. It’s kinda like skateboarding with higher stakes. If you tear down skateparks, people who enjoy skateboarding with skate in public. Today we are expanding urban sprawl to the point that city’s are destroying the few race tracks that are left. So no duh hooners are going to hoon in public roads. The government destroyed the local track last year. So ultimately no I don’t think boring cars are the solution to bad driving. If anything it’s just gonna make it worse because no one cares about how well they drive it’s boring.

  • Random_user@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cars aren’t about driving. You want to drive? Go to the track.
    Cars are about getting from point A to point B. Bring on full automation please!

    • StephniBefni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually quite enjoy driving, especially at night, really helps me relax and get rid of anxiety. I would love to do a track day, but shits expensive.

      • Dr. Coomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        On the one hand, I agree, but on the other hand, it’s one of the most dangerous times to drive

        • PolarisFx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been working nights for a good chunk of my life and I can’t understand why people say this. I prefer to drive at night, maybe if I didn’t live in a big city I might think differently. But, I’ve never had an accident, I rarely sit in traffic, cops generally have bigger shit to deal with at night so I don’t need to worry about speed traps or anything. I can’t think of any downside to night driving

        • StephniBefni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Idk, I mean it’s darker, but there are also a lot less cars on the road. I do what I can for accident prevention, I have a dash cam as well, but nothing is 100% risk free and I’m gonna attempt to enjoy what life I have left, and driving is something I wnjoy.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        99% of people want just that. a -> b with a level of safety, fuel efficiency, comfort and a cell phone to distract them. Nobody wants to be constantly pumping the clutch in slow traffic on a daily commute. I have an automatic, and it’s perfect for DD. We also have a small, 6-cyl with a standard, and that car is a ton of fun for evenings out and weekends. I wouldn’t want to make myself or the car suffer in a metro area traffic jam moving at a snail’s pace.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Short of actual full self driving which doesn’t presently exist why do you think your cell phone is part of your commute?

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That was just a sarcastic addition based on people not caring about or paying attention to/how divorced they are from driving and the driving experience.

          • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because the ideal commute doesn’t involve driving, it involves me reading Lemmy on my phone while the car drives me to work.

            Or, ideally, just me riding my bicycle, but that’s unrealistic where I live.

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I miss my manual transmission sometimes. Though after having an AirBNB in the mountains, I did not miss it. I never want to stop on a hill that steep in a manual.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    Try sitting in traffic for 2 hours with a stick, moving 10 feet at a time, and we can talk about how much you love manual

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      When people say they prefer driving a manual, the key word there is driving. Sitting in traffic sucks no matter what kind of vehicle you’re in.

    • lseif@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      seriously if this is an issue for you, youre probably just bad at driving stick

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, it really depends how heavy your clutch is. Exonoboxes (Saturn SL2, Sonic) or sporty cars with lower torque numbers (Miata, Celica, Fiero, Prelude, S2000) = no biggie. Higher torque (V8 Camaros and Trans Ams, Corvettes) usually have an assist spring to help you hold the petal to the floor, but engaging/disengaging take more leg effort.

        /late 30s guy who only owned one auto that was converted prior to buying an RV

        On a side note, modern manuals kind of suck. They hold revs when you pop the clutch for emissions reasons, which makes the 1-2 shift especially kind of suck. A lot of them also barely engine brake and dual mass flywheels on higher output engines can clunk if you unload them hard. Although regen braking isn’t super thrilling, it’s way more engaging that engine braking in basically any model year 2010+ vehicle.

        • KrummsHairyBalls@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a Camaro. Really heavy clutch. I’ve sat in stop and go traffic for hours before and it’s fine.

          Like the other guy said, if it’s an issue, you’re just bad.

    • ...m...@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      …i play a game gauging the aggregate flow of traffic and modulating my speed to avoid braking as much as possible; usually resolves to steady motion and as a consequence i don’t mind the traffic so much…

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, I don’t drive a car at all on my regular commute - a 45 minute long bus ride really isn’t a big deal to me.

      Let’s me drive a car I know I’m gonna enjoy while avoiding the worst parts of driving a manual. And as a bonus, I save money on fuel, because bus rides are still cheaper where I live

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly why I drive an automatic now. Sure, standard transmissions are fun, if you have a fun car, but my little sedan isn’t exactly a fun sports car.

      Driving in traffic was annoying with a stick. Never again.

      • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A lot of autos you can use the gear selector to determine what rpm you want it to shift at, or use it to downshift. Most people just throw it in D and wonder what the other selector positions are for.

        Also a lot of small manual cars suck for highway driving cause they cruise at a higher rpm. Cruising along at 120kmph at 2k rpm is pretty great.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If that is what it takes for people to demand and use more public transportation, then I am loving it.

      (I live near a city and don’t need to own a car. I only ever drove manual in the past, and also got stuck in a traffic jam occasionally. IMO it wasn’t that difficult to stop and go, but it depends on your car. I had more issues with a rented big transporter, that required to release the clutch while steping on the gas. But that is just practice.

      I remember driving a automatic transmission car once for 10 minutes or so, and it was very stressful, because it behaved so different.)

  • Marcbmann@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had a car with push button start and a CVT. After putting the first 50 miles on the car, the brake light switch died. Nissan, in their ultimate wisdom, used the brake light switch to tell the computer if you are pressing the brake when starting the car. Well, no brake light switch, no starting the engine. Had to get it towed back to the dealership to get fixed.

    I now have a real key and a manual transmission.

      • Metacortechs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Clutch pedal as well, so you have 2x as many switches to go bad and strand you if you don’t know how to bypass.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I had an older manual car that had this. But it was a mechanical release of the ignition lock connected to the brake pedal.

      • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nissan had probably the most reliable motors through the 80s, 90s and early aughts, then the Renault thing happened . . . so yeah you’re right.

        • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Modern Nissan is pretty hit-and-miss. Their CVT transmissions have a bad reputation too. I have a new Acura with push button start and a manual transmission and all the electronics work correctly with no issues.

          • rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Same with my Subaru. Staying away from the questionable brands like Nissan and Kia is the key. Never had an issue with my push start or CVT.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why all the CVT hate? I drove a Jeep Patriot that had a CVT for about 100,000 miles before any major things broke, and what broke on me was the engine, not the transmission. That thing has great gas milage, as long as you used the CVT properly. Also need to swap out the air filter, oil filter, spark plugs, and plug wires, cause the ones that Chrysler puts on are crap, but if you do that, and keep your tach as close to 1000-1500 rpm as possible, I was getting 35/50 mpg.

              • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                There’s always that one guy with a jatco CVT that hasn’t failed yet. Those are called “ouliers” and are not representative.

                • rambaroo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I had a Sentra once upon a time with a Jatco CVT that worked fine. Bunch of other shit wrong with that car though. So that’s two guys now

              • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The thing is, good modern automatics should last more than 100,000 miles. Motors should definitely last more than 100,000 miles, but from what I see online a lot that seems to be about the use-by date for Stelantis motors. Nissan (Jatco) CVTs were notorious for failing at or a little before 100k, and Nissan was one of the first (maybe the first) to mass adopt the CVT into their vehicles. It’s sad because Nissan had reached near engineering perfection on their VQ/VK motors and their traditional automatics prior to Renault getting involved in their business. Our 2011 Armada, the gas guzzling bitch that she is, runs like its new with 200k miles on the motor and tranny (both engineered in the late 90s).

        • Marcbmann@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m like 2 weeks late here, but yes. Nothing scarier than hitting the gas and feeling the belt slip inside of the transmission

    • MrEff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I used to have a 92 Honda accord. The car was built on par with Toyota as far as reliability. With that said though, there was one time it wouldn’t start. Push started it, it worked, but when starting- the problem persisted. Went to a shop to diagnose it. Turns out manual cars normally use a clutch switch to tell if you have the clutch pressed to start the car. There is a little rubber standoff on it to dampen the clutch pedal coming back up and hitting it, making it last longer. The little rubber bit fell out and got lodged making the switch not disengage. It was a 10 cent part that cost me an hour of diagnostic time (the minimum). So yes, manual cars still have an equivalent problem to what you had.

  • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually was a real advocate for gears, then I drove my wife’s new car for some time. Modern automatic isn’t only comfortable, it’s actually more (fuel) efficient, especially in the city. Now I’m an automatic guy. And - the circle of life - my daughter, looking for her first car this year: “No, I want gears!” Now she’s got gears. In a car that weighs less than my phone, but hey, what do I old 🥔 potato know.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m resigned that manual transmissons are a thing of the past, but man, it’s such a huge part of the enjoyment of driving for me.

      Getting that perfect shift, especially if accelerating quicky or going up a steep hill is just so satisfying… Or the “minigame” of balancing the clutch and throttle from a full stop uphill without using the handbrake… And that feeling when you smoothly downshift going down a road and the revs pick up, while you ease up on the brake…

      Yeah I really like driving.

      • pkpenguin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Learned automatic then later manual out of necessity and this is just nuts to me. People enjoy that? Driving is already fairly obnoxious just getting around traffic and the extra tedium of having to shift gears at every stop and go was awful. This has to be some kind of Stockholm syndrome or nostalgia or something

        • bitwolf@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m a computer geek and I always look at it like a computer. Is a Mac or Windows easier to use? Arguably yes.

          Yet I use Linux anyway because I like the full control despite the trade offs. And some tradeoffs I actually prefer

          I could just click install on Windows and Mac (and on Linux), or I can download a program and manually put each of it’s constituent files into the correct place in order to run it.

          • pkpenguin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m a computer guy and view an automatic as just that: Automation to do away with a needless repetitive task. Not to say that I missed your analogy, but “full control” is an awfully overblown way to put it when it comes to a manual unless you’re doing NASCAR or something. Our programmers and engineers know what they’re doing. Your car can automatically shift gears and do more than well enough to get you to work and back.

        • DoomsdaySprocket@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          My attention drifts too much when I drive auto, I prefer the extra thinking and functions that manual driving needs.

          For those with a similar view on the subject, keep in mind motorcycles are still almost exclusively manual shift in North America, so when stick shift is basically dead, there is somewhere to go, technically.

        • the_seven_sins@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I cycle to work from time to time, even tough I own a (manual) car.

          It takes longer to go by bike, I get sweaty, it might rain in the afternoon but I still take the bike over the car. Because it’s fun. (Even more then driving a manual.)

    • bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah they’ve been more fuel efficient for awhile now, but you can take my 6 speed from my cold dead hands 🤣

      I just like it.

      I have an auto truck because I needed a truck and that was what was available for the price I wanted to pay, but my daily driver is a stick and imma drive it till one of us dies lol

      • root_beer@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Word. I give not a single fuck that modern autos are more efficient and quicker than manuals. They are boring as hell. If I ever switch to an automatic, it will be because I’ve switched to something electrified and manuals are altogether gone.

        I say this as someone who has dealt with the stop-go traffic on a daily basis.

    • rambaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Modern CVTs will always beat manual transmissions in efficiency now. And probably reliability with reputable brands as well. It’s only a matter of time for consumers to catch up at this point.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Should have put her into an old SAAB. I’m talking pre-'92, before GM bought them. They had gears, power, and speed. They also weighed over 2 tons, and are insanely safe. I’ve crashed several on the track, and walk away with scratches every time. It’s a really expensive hobby at times.

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup, this is fact, no arguments here.

          But it doesn’t feel this way though, because new cars kinda… crumple… in a crash.

          I get that it’s how they protect the driver, by deforming and absorbing the energy instead of just thrusting all into the occupants, but really makes them feel flimsy, compared to those olds hunks of steel.

          I’d rather be alive in a crumpled wreck that dead in a barely dented tank though.

  • Skkorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    I drive manual, it’s great for my ADHD haha keeps me from fucking around inside my car in traffic.

    That being said, the person who made this needs to calm down. It’s not that serious.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Manual transmission is also a great anti-theft device, since most kids don’t know how to drive it.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Funny, when I was in the military all the Gen X’ers couldn’t drive stick when we got rentals in Europe. I could because I rode a motorcycle, so I just always drove.

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        My own purely anecdotal observation is that there are still far more of us Xers who know how to drive a manual transmission. One good thing about it, for my wife and I at least, is that our gen Z kids never asked to borrow our cars and just bought their own automatics or borrowed from their grandparents.

        My wife’s car has an especially fiendish hydraulic clutch that will stall out if you even look at it funny, so that helped too.

  • set_secret@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    "EMBRACE THE COMPLEXITY OF MANUAL TRANSMISSION

    • CARS are not just about driving, they’re about mastering the ART of machinery!
    • Want to feel alive on a steep hill? Forget simplicity, EMBRACE the handbrake juggle and the dance of the clutch pedal!
    • “I could simply shift to D, but where’s the thrill in that?” - A call to arms by the Connoisseurs of Complexity.
    • DEFEND your right to a gearbox that requires three limbs and a keen sense of timing to operate!

    CELEBRATE MANUAL TRANSMISSIONS (These are the cryptic contraptions deciphered only by the Worthy)

    ZIGZAG MAZE? - Challenge accepted! VOLUME KNOB? - Twist and shout your way through the gears! ??? - Only the true driver knows!

    “Please engage the starter motor.” - “Certainly, after I adjust the choke and check the distributor!” “I fear no hill start, for I have the power of the clutch and the arcane knowledge of the gearbox!”

    Join the ranks of those who drive not for convenience, but for the pure, unadulterated challenge."

  • phorq@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t worry, AI transmission works most of the time (but every now and then it may hallucinate on the highway…)

  • dewritoninja@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone studying tech, yes please, give me the dummest most rudimentary car with no computer or servos. I don’t want general motors to gather my biometrics or a script kiddy to disable my steering. Dumb technology is best always. Fuck that android auto bs or whatever abomination the manufacturer adds. Just want a speaker with an aux cord so I can listen to my flacs

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I love the idea of a sound system that is just an aux cord to a speaker

      If I ever win the lottery, I’m hiring a 50 people like you to build an incredibly basic production car together. Make it barely or technically meet the modern technology standards to be road legal in all 50 states, but use the simplest mechanical solution to everything a car needs to do. I assume a lot of systems would have to be installed as a “backup” to the electrical version, but I’d want to build it to be able to function perfectly with all the computers disconnected. Probably ship it with instructions phrased as warnings of what not to do.

      • Noved@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        As long as the price reflects that absolutely. I feel like one of the reasons cars are getting so pricy is because we are filling them with so much bloat. Ex. Heated seats, power windows, tablets. Like, what happened to a base model car?

        • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, I would want the price to reflect the simplicity, and lack of extras should help with that. Let the aftermarket companies do heated seats and fancy stereos.

          • Noved@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Open source car? Lol. Design it as easy to aftermarket as possible. Let aftermarket companies sell full seats and ECT. Use only standard connections and hardware

            • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Surely there is an open source car by now. Some sort of street legal kit?

              I do think open source car is the best label to describe what I’m dreaming of. But factory built to take advantage of bulk order pricing for the parts and because people who are actually willing and able to put their own car together are rare.

              • Inductor@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Nope, at least afaik. Prototyping and building cars by hand (without a whole factory set up to build it) is hard. Not to mention extremely expensive. And you have to build multiple (identical) copies of the prototype to get it street legal, because of crash testing. And you have to be able to guarantee that what people build with your kit remains identical to your prototype. Or everyone assembling such a kit would have to build multiple copies of the car and go through the certification process individually.

                And of course there are very few people that would want to assemble their own car, so you wouldn’t be able to make a business out of it.

                • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’ve seen a few builds from scratch online. All of them say it turned out to be far FAR more difficult than they ever imagined. Once the thing works properly, it’s up to what state/ country the builder is in to determine how hard or easy it is to get it legal to drive on the road.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This exists in the motorcycle world, actually. You can buy a 2023 Suzuki DR650. It will have a speedometer, an air cooled 650cc single cylinder engine, and that’s it. No ECU, no LED lights, no ABS, nothing. It doesn’t even have fuel injection.

        In the automotove world there is/was something sort of close to what you’re describing. It’s called a Mitsubishi Mirage. 3 cylinders making a furious 78 horsepower, gets great mileage, and is absurdly easy to maintain and repair. And ever since they started making the current Mirage in 2014, it has been given so much hate because it’s a no-frills economy car. People literally bitch about how you can see a couple of screw heads when you open the door, and cry that it’s slower than a Mustang and less luxurious than a Lexus.

        So be prepared to hear that when designing a basic car. There are automotive writers and reviewers who are very out of touch, and can’t understand that a basic cheap car is a good thing.

        • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh absolutely, I’d expect this imaginary car would be an ugly thing, and constantly panned by reviewers. People would be outraged that some nobody burned hundreds of millions in lottery money on a trash looking car. Meanwhile, every mechanic constantly recommends it for a daily driver because it just works and is super easy to fix.

          • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are two basic kinds of Mirage. There is a hatchback and a sedan. The sedan has a huge trunk (My wife is 5’-9", I’m 6’-0", and we can both fit in the trunk) and a decent amount of rear legroom.

            My wife and I have a 2017 “G4” Mirage, which is the sedan. Ours is a 5 speed manual, the only “option” we got is bluetooth which we never use. It does have power windows and locks standard. It has a steel oil pan, not an aluminum one, so it doesn’t strip out as easily. The only problem we have had with ours is a gas guage that started acting up last month. Other than that it’s a solid car that gets us 45+ mpg highway.

              • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s actually frustrating to drive with it’s 78 horsepower and 2,000 pounds. But not for the reason you might think.

                The problem is, most of the time, It’s the fastest car on the road. Every time we drive it somewhere, our 78 horsepower car is unable to go more than 30 miles per hour, because there is someome with a twin-turbo F150, or a Hemi Challenger, or literally any car that should be faster, and they are in the way. I’ve lost count how many times I’ve followed some allegedly much faster vehicle down an onramp at 40 mph, wishing they would go faster so I (and those behind me) could merge. The 1.2 liter under the hood hasn’t ever been an impediment. It is always held back by another car that should be faster.

                The only car I have had that was worse about this was an old Metro. (1 liter 3 cylinder, 55 hp, 1600-ish pounds) The problem with that car was people knew what it was, and they would blow their engines or cause an accident trying to get in front of it just so they could pull their phone out and scroll facebook while going under the speed limit. I noticed a bridge I used to drive over always had a speed trap. I also noticed that the easiest type of vehicle to “trigger” were the fancy lifted diesel 4x4 trucks. So I started to bait them near that bridge, so they could show me how their big expensive truck was faster than a car I literally rebuilt in my driveway, and they woukd inevitably blow by a cop at 60+ in a 45.

                • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Haha, baiting people into a speeding ticket when they try to prove something must be very satisfying.

                  The only car I’ve had that was just too slow was a 2006 Hyundai Elantra. Cheap to buy, cheap to fix, cheap little tires. But so so slow. Whenever I’d borrow another car, I would inevitably chirp the tires trying to accelerate normally.

      • CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would also join this endeavor. This country needs a small, light pickup truck again that a guy can fix in his driveway with basic tools.

        • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes! Something the size of a 90s ranger, or even a little smaller. Built with flat glass and a bench seat if we can get away with it.

    • Paddzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      No wonder you’re just studying. I’ve met plenty of people like you. Just because YOU can’t do a good job or understand it, doesn’t make it bad.

      Sincerely, Engineer with 13 years of experience.

      • dewritoninja@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I understand it and that’s why I hate it. I don’t want to hack my car to fix it like farmers are forced to do with their Jhon deere equipment. This whole inserting tech into everything is invasive and anti consumer

  • papalonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does anybody have the version of this about roads, intersections and such? I’ve been trying to find it but don’t really know what to search

  • Paddzr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s a thought, get a car made in the same decade. Your experience on budget automatic from 2001 doesn’t represent modern cars.