Wu9fee@lemmy.ca to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoLemmy devs blocklist the anime instance Ani.social from join-lemmy.org and Lemmy.mlani.socialexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1139file-textcross-posted to: anime@lemmy.mlmeanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.workstankiejerk@lemmy.world
arrow-up1139external-linkLemmy devs blocklist the anime instance Ani.social from join-lemmy.org and Lemmy.mlani.socialWu9fee@lemmy.ca to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: anime@lemmy.mlmeanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.workstankiejerk@lemmy.world
Copied from https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/5719708 : It was added to the excluded instances because it allegedly contains loli content (CSAM)
minus-squareCallie@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoWouldn’t they use allegedly in the same way that news orgs use it? It’s lack of accountability if they get sued
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up23·1 year agoIt kind of cuts both ways, though. If you want to actually punish something for doing something, “allegedly” doesn’t really cut it. Hey, I allege that lemmygrad has tons of Loli porn on it! No need to check, I’m alleging it. Guess it needs to be blacklisted now too?
Wouldn’t they use allegedly in the same way that news orgs use it? It’s lack of accountability if they get sued
It kind of cuts both ways, though. If you want to actually punish something for doing something, “allegedly” doesn’t really cut it.
Hey, I allege that lemmygrad has tons of Loli porn on it! No need to check, I’m alleging it. Guess it needs to be blacklisted now too?