Highlights: The White House issued draft rules today that would require federal agencies to evaluate and constantly monitor algorithms used in health care, law enforcement, and housing for potential discrimination or other harmful effects on human rights.

Once in effect, the rules could force changes in US government activity dependent on AI, such as the FBI’s use of face recognition technology, which has been criticized for not taking steps called for by Congress to protect civil liberties. The new rules would require government agencies to assess existing algorithms by August 2024 and stop using any that don’t comply.

  • bioemerl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As long as he doesn’t start getting in the way of open source algorithms were fine.

    Delay llama 3 and I’m voting for whoever runs against Biden. No exceptions, I will become a single issue voter and this will be my issue.

    • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty dumb dawg. The people running against him want christofascism. Not becoming the Christian version of Iran is my single issue.

        • mars
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why is it the most important issue for you?

          • bioemerl@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The thing that has the most direct and pressing impact on my life right now. A ban on open source AI would be like a ban on watching television.

            • SkyeStarfall
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 year ago

              I must guess you cannot get pregnant, aren’t a minority, as well as are wealthy. Otherwise I cannot see how this can ever be true.

              • bioemerl@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That second one doesn’t matter when it comes to abortion because guys also have wives and girlfriends who can get pregnant and it’s pretty important they can abort when they do. Acting like abortion isn’t something that impacts men as well is nothing just isn’t the truth.

                And I’m not really wealthy, but I live a pretty slimmed down lifestyle with very few expenses such the money is not a direct concern.

                When there are no pressing issues for me to vote for those things become stuff I would vote along the lines of, and I side with a Democrats on all of them.

                But I’m not some idiot who’s going to vote for the sake of other people, I vote for issues that matter to me and nothing else.

                Don’t fuck with AI (and continue funding Ukraine) and I’ll be on their side. Simple as that.

                  • bioemerl@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Well no, I don’t got mine, quite the opposite. “Mine” is literally in the process of being banned.

                    I’m saying “fuck you, if you act against my interests I’m not voting for you”

                    And I’ll stand by that to the end. When “mine” is no longer under threat I’ll vote for Democrats every day of the week.

                • mars
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Why not vote for the sake of other people when their lives, health, and safety are on the line?

                  • bioemerl@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Because I’ve seen these things work and I know for damn sure that if those people have a chance to vote for me they wouldn’t do it in a million years.

                    I’ve learned better than the trust narratives of how you should be a good person.

                    All I will get is yet more rounds of talk about how everyone else needs help while all the issues I actually care about are left to wither and die.

                    So fuck them, I’m voting based on the issues that I feel are important and impact my life.

        • deur@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          I sure hope you are a strawman account because you are an idiot if this is who you are.

          • bioemerl@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The idiot is the person who votes based on other people’s priorities.

            If you want to believe garbage about some impending Christian fascist state you’re more than welcome to, but reality is quite a bit more mundane.

                • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Aint doomer, just a very big follower of hope for the best prepare for the worst. Has kept my kin and ancestor alive in the past will do the same in the future. But then again I aint the retard who’s more worried about useless tech junk that’ll probably have minimum effect on society as whole.

                  I probably wont convince ya of jack and or shit, but what I can do is point out that not looking out for other folks usually ends badly for people. A shunned man is a deadman.

                  • bioemerl@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Acting like everyone ending up in concentration camps is without question doomerist.

                    not looking out for other folks usually ends badly for people

                    So does letting the government put the most revolutionary technology of the century in the hands of big tech. The Democrats choose their policy. If nobody swing votes and you all expect the world to blindly vote Democrat they’ll get away with shit they shouldn’t get away with.

                    The ideal scenario is that there are enough people like me that the Democrats think twice about being overbearing and still win regardless.

    • krellor@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think you have anything to worry about. All this requires is that any models used by the government are tested for bias. Which is a good thing.

      Go ask an early generation ai image generator to make pictures of people cleaning and it will give you a bunch of pictures of women. There are all sorts of examples of racial, sex, and religious biases in the models because of the data they were trained on.

      Requiring the executive agencies to test for bias is a good thing.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This will entrench big tech in federal government, but I’m not too worried about limits on the government.

      • bioemerl@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the only concern I have so far is the leverage of the defense powers act to require foundational model development to sent red team results to the Fed. That’s a hint that will enable them to ban release of models in the future.