I think it’s totally inappropriate to be using a non-rolling release OS as a desktop. You’re way more likely to run into issues when you massively update your system every 6 months - 3 years, rather than keeping things up to date constantly. It’s not like anyone tests the upgrade process on a desktop. They just do it one day. Whereas it makes sense on a server to be more cautious about updates, where there’s presumably staging environments, etc.
Oh yeah, I don’t doubt Arch is solid, just different strokes for different folks. I got a bunch of stable apps I use all day every day to get stuff done, including some coding and keep up. Solid OS for my needs, no racing stripes, does what I need -every- day. I invest my limited OS time in maintenance/backups.
I recently began moving to Mint 21 from 3 NO-TROUBLES years in 19.3. Install from ISO in 20 minutes, copy my apps & configs over, done. Just as with 19.3. No doubt about smooth sailing. Point releases every few months, done in 5 min. Support 4 more years.
I just don’t understand what problems you think you’re saving yourself from. If the latest version of a package has a bug or just doesn’t work for some reason, just install an older one. It takes 2 minutes, and you get to use software from this decade with modern features.
I didn’t mention any problems I don’t have. I just don’t waste time on updates I don’t need. I already have the older one, and it works just fine. (Now and then I hear of a new version that’s better, and switch to it.)
Besides, we both know that sometimes updating Linux software does create problems … which is proven by the existence of Arch Wiki … and Debian stable … or force us to relearn some ‘improved’ features (prime example: KDE’s ‘Kate’ editor.) And don’t get me started on Gnome.
Anyway … so long as you’re enjoying yourself with Arch, good for you.
I run arch and have VERY few problems. I have way more problems on my work ubuntu computer because I’m forced to add PPAs to get even remotely modern things like git versions that support this https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config/#Documentation/git-config.txt-pushdefault
I think it’s totally inappropriate to be using a non-rolling release OS as a desktop. You’re way more likely to run into issues when you massively update your system every 6 months - 3 years, rather than keeping things up to date constantly. It’s not like anyone tests the upgrade process on a desktop. They just do it one day. Whereas it makes sense on a server to be more cautious about updates, where there’s presumably staging environments, etc.
Oh yeah, I don’t doubt Arch is solid, just different strokes for different folks. I got a bunch of stable apps I use all day every day to get stuff done, including some coding and keep up. Solid OS for my needs, no racing stripes, does what I need -every- day. I invest my limited OS time in maintenance/backups.
I recently began moving to Mint 21 from 3 NO-TROUBLES years in 19.3. Install from ISO in 20 minutes, copy my apps & configs over, done. Just as with 19.3. No doubt about smooth sailing. Point releases every few months, done in 5 min. Support 4 more years.
I just don’t understand what problems you think you’re saving yourself from. If the latest version of a package has a bug or just doesn’t work for some reason, just install an older one. It takes 2 minutes, and you get to use software from this decade with modern features.
I didn’t mention any problems I don’t have. I just don’t waste time on updates I don’t need. I already have the older one, and it works just fine. (Now and then I hear of a new version that’s better, and switch to it.)
Besides, we both know that sometimes updating Linux software does create problems … which is proven by the existence of Arch Wiki … and Debian stable … or force us to relearn some ‘improved’ features (prime example: KDE’s ‘Kate’ editor.) And don’t get me started on Gnome.
Anyway … so long as you’re enjoying yourself with Arch, good for you.