• GONADS125@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    224
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not happy with this development, but I’m slightly amused by the irony being that lemmy.ml is pro-china and has been moderated as such.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        ML stands for Marxist leninist, which means they love authoritarian regimes that don’t like the US. The number of them that unironically stan Stalin is baffling.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          .ml is the top level domain for Mali, it doesn’t have anything to do with Marxist-Leninism by itself. They may have chosen it as a tongue in cheek reference, but it is also a cheaper alternative to other more popular tlds like .com.

        • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          ML is machine learning. It means they love teaching AI to overthrow the illuminati government lizard people. Can’t believe u didn’t know that, kinda embarrassing

          Sees some use in Mali and for some websites about machine learning. Use is relatively rare elsewhere.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/.ml

        • nlm@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          .ml domain names used to be free (together with .ga I think it was) through freenom so it might just be that they snagged themselves a free domain that just happened to be ml.

          Not saying you couldn’t be right but not everything is quite as well thought out as it first seems.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand why the pro China tanked subs would get banned but not the rest.

        • 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is exactly it.

          I’m moving to China for work, so I’m interested in alternative points of view on Chinese society from the usual U.S. mainstream media CCP hate boner. I checked out hexbear, and… my goodness.

          They cheer for a version of China that the Chinese themselves would be embarrassed by. It’s clearly driven by 14-year-old white boy edgelords who are enamored with a hardcore Marxist-Leninist vision of China that never existed, most likely in reaction to a dislike of modern Western capitalism. I mean, they referenced “struggle sessions” with nostalgia and cheer for Bashar al-Assad because China is being friendly to him.

          Real-life China is quite different from the depictions you see on main Lemmy instances, but it sure as hell isn’t anything like what the tankies are jerking off to, either.

          • vidarh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            It feels like most Western CCP cheerleaders are basically cheering on a pre-Deng version of the CCP and haven’t quite noticed that the CCP of today would totally purge anyone pushing the pre-Deng/pre-1978 views of the CCP.

        • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          “China” isn’t “embarrassed” by lemmy.ml or hexbear.net. “China” just shuts down access to non-Chinese social media sites as they are discovered. Any social media site that isn’t currently blocked in China is on numbered days until they are blocked, whether “pro-China” or “anti-China”.

          • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is true. I was kidding. That said, the Chinese government does engage in social media. And they probably would see lemmy users as a poor messenger, if they cared about lemmy.

      • redballooon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        They might spread western ideas of communism in China. That’s not something China can allow.

  • redballooon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The great misunderstanding of hard left leaning western folks is that neither Russia nor China are socialist or communist.

    Just like their hard right leaning counterparts they’re stuck in a mindset from the first half of the past century.

    • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They don’t really believe Russia is socialist to any degree, they just support it because it (supposedly) opposes the western hegemony, USA/NATO, etc.

      Basically the same logic as that of pro-Russian right-wingers.

      • wick@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had a bunch of hexbear and ml’s tell me russian war crimes in Berlin were “Nazi myths”. Apparently the Nazis had more influence over the world of historical academia after they lost than Russia.

        Also other allied war crimes did happen and weren’t Nazi myths.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Supporters of autocratic state capitalist regimes like China and Russia also aren’t left-leaning.

              • lulztard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                To feel smart. Funnily enough, socialism really has it pretty hard trying to get off the ground. The US coups another nation every five years to install some corrupt dictator that’s more than willing to sell out his nation to US interests in exhchange for power. So being hunted down and utterly corrupted by the worlds biggest terrorist nation, calling socialism “never truly tried” is kiiiiiiiiiind of correct. There is a lot of social policies in Europe and those worl pretty well, though US interests and their bootlickers erode those, too.

      • redballooon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk, just last week I overheard a report of an old communist whose life wishes were to visit Vietnam, Kuba and Russia.

    • mnoram@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think I’m confused. I haven’t seen any left leaning people support Russia or China. It’s right leaning people that support them. What am I missing? Also I’ve never seen any left leaning people say Russia and China are actually socialist or communist since the 80s or 90s. I’ve seen right leaning people claim that lefties believe that but never any examples in real life.

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Left and right is not a defined group, it’s a name and any group can pretend/think they belong to it.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The most support for China is basic materialist analysis: they’ve heavily invested in housing, high speed rail, electric car infrastructure, and green energy. Coincidentally: all rather related.

        But that is generally the support associated with China: a materialist analysis, usually, if not always, regarding infrastructure.

  • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    China*

    Please stop saying “mainland China”. It implies Taiwan is part of China, at least to some.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      1 year ago

      Please stop saying “mainland China”. It implies Taiwan is part of China, at least to some.

      It means without Hong Kong.

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Mainland China refers to China sans Hong Kong and Macao, yes. Because you have to distinguish and “Mainland China” is a whole lot less typing than “China but without Hong Kong and, oh yeah, Macao too”.

    • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The official name of Taiwan’s government is Republic of China, and it’s the continuation of the government that controlled all of China before Mao’s uprising.

      So I’m not sure your argument makes sense. They claim to be the legitimate Chinese government in their own name.

      • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Outside of that very specific context, China == PRC. I understand the history of Taiwan very well, and it’s important for people to understand that they are two different countries.

        • CoderKat@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, in colloquial usage, most people understand that China and Taiwan are two different countries and there’s no confusion over which one is which.

      • deur@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        They claim to be independent, the name is something given to them by (you guessed it) China.

        • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, that’s just completely wrong. Taiwan’s government was created when Chiang Kai-Shek fled mainland China in the 1950s. It’s the continuation of the Republic of China that governed the entire country of China before the PRC government took over.

          Saying that the PRC created the ROC name is ridiculous. The ROC predates the creation of the PRC and is the older name. The PRC didn’t even exist when it was created. Also suggesting that the PRC would ever endorse the ROC in any format is silly. Their entire position is that the ROC doesn’t exist.

          You should go read a Wikipedia article on the history of Taiwan as your grasp of the history here is not strong.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They claim to be independent

          They actually don’t.

          Edit: People downvoting this have absolutely no clue at all about Taiwanese politics and don’t even bother googling “Taiwan independence”. If they did, they’d knew that Taiwan never formally declared independence.

          • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Show me where. Taiwan claims to BE China, not part of China. That’s a big difference.

            Also, they don’t need to claim independence since Taiwan has never been part of PRC. That would make as much sense as France never claims independence from the USA.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Show me where.

              Are you seriously not able to read the replies with the “Currently, Taiwan’s political status is ambiguous” line? WTF?

            • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              And yet there’s a whole wikipedia page saying the opposite?

              No, not really.

              The Taiwan independence movement is a political movement which advocates the formal declaration of an independent and sovereign Taiwanese state, as opposed to Chinese unification or the status quo in Cross-Strait relations.

              Currently, Taiwan’s political status is ambiguous.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_independence_movement

              • Slayan@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Former president Lee Teng-hui has stated that he never pursued Taiwanese independence. Lee views Taiwan as already an independent state, and that the call for “Taiwanese independence” could even confuse the international community by implying that Taiwan once viewed itself as part of China. From this perspective, Taiwan is independent even if it remains unable to enter the UN.

                Most Taiwanese and political parties of the ROC support the status quo, and recognize that this is de facto independence through sovereign self-rule. Even among those who believe Taiwan is and should remain independent, the threat of war from PRC softens their approach, and they tend to support maintaining the status quo rather than pursuing an ideological path that could result in war with the PRC.

                The questions of independence and the island’s relationship to mainland China are complex and inspire very strong emotions among Taiwanese people. There are some who continue to maintain the KMT’s position, which states that the ROC is the sole legitimate government for all of China (of which they consider Taiwan to be a part), and that the aim of the government should be eventual unification of the mainland and Taiwan under the rule of the ROC. Some argue that Taiwan has been, and should continue to be, completely independent from China and should become a Taiwanese state with a distinct name.

                On 25 October 2004, in Beijing, the U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said Taiwan is “not sovereign,” provoking strong comments from both the Pan-Green and Pan-Blue coalitions – but for very different reasons. From the DPP’s side, President Chen declared that “Taiwan is definitely a sovereign, independent country, a great country that absolutely does not belong to the People’s Republic of China”. The TSU (Taiwan Solidarity Union) criticized Powell, and questioned why the US sold weapons to Taiwan if it were not a sovereign state. From the KMT, then Chairman Ma Ying-jeou announced, “the Republic of China has been a sovereign state ever since it was formed [in 1912].”

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not HK and Hong Kong.

        Also some people in Hainan will refer to the “mainland” as opposed to Hainan island.

        It turns out words can be used in multiple ways. It’s not all about Taiwan.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is hilarious to me. I haven’t really had much opportunity to interact with them before so just today I got into a discussion about how Americans weren’t the most propagandized people in the world because N Korea exists. Apparently NK is a pretty cool place and I just refuse to believe it bc I’m a propagandized American (oh sorry, they say USian for some reason).

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Their flair for supporting LatAm anti-american groups has caused them to pick up the LatAm chip on the shoulder that nobody else uses “America” to refer to the whole of North and South America like they do, and instead use it to specifically denote the US.

          • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh right, I’ve seen that before. It’s just a culture/language barrier thing, like pretty much everyone who speaks English uses American for the US, but it’s different in a lot of Spanish speaking countries. Funny that it also stems from an anti-American place though. Those folks seem exhausting.

            • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It doesn’t necessarily stem from an anti-american thing, it just so happens that a lot of anti-americans just so happen to have picked up that particular linguistic quirk.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I tested two services that supposedly allow you to check if a site is blocked in China. I don’t know with certainty how accurate these tools are in general, but I can say they gave me consistent results for lemmy.ml, hexbear.net, and lemmy.ca. Hexbear and lemmy.ml register as blocked, while other instances go through.

    https://www.comparitech.com/privacy-security-tools/blockedinchina/

    Results: lemmy.ml, hexbear.net, lemmy.ca, lemmy.world

    https://www.vpnmentor.com/tools/test-the-great-china-firewall/

    Results: lemmy.ml, hexbear.net, lemmy.ca. Lemmy.world could not be parsed using this tool, perhaps due to not being set to work with that TLD.

    • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmygrad hasn’t been spotted yet. When it is spotted, it will be blocked as well, like literally every social media site that reaches the authoritarians’ awareness.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What community was in posted at? I hate how these post URLs don’t show the community in the URL.

      EDIT: The modlog is interesting. Very sporadic activity up until a few days ago, and then the mod is cleaning up posts, comments, getting rid of moderators, etc.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        No idea. It’s indeed very annoying that the links don’t show the community.

  • froggers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Critical support for the comrades in China for having to put up with those instances for so long.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Papa China is just gonna go buy some milk, lemmy.ml, you’re in charge, don’t let hexbear use the stove or any knives while I’m out!”

    [disappears forever]