[A]n INI configuration file in the Windows Canary channel, discovered by German website Deskmodder, includes references to a “Subscription Edition,” “Subscription Type,” and a “subscription status.”

    • Veedem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      209
      ·
      1 year ago

      For the average consumer, this would help Apple and Google out more than anything. People want what they know.

      On the more savvy user side and for gamers, this move would, potentially, help Linux adoption rates.

      • penguin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        83
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would help all of their competitors. A non zero number of people would move from windows to each of the others.

        Whether or not the number moving away from windows and on to each of the others is significant or not is a different matter.

        The biggest thing helping Linux right now is Valve’s work improving the gaming experience, IMO.

        • Zhao@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve never used Linux but if Microsoft goes subscription I’m out and I’ll be learning Linux.

          • mesamune@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            NGL PopOs is easy and the works with steam/most things easily.

            I really hope Windows doesn’t go subscription based because of the proliferation of ads.

        • PHLAK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been meaning to install Linux on my primary gaming PC but haven’t yet due to laziness. This would 100% get me to pull the trigger if/when I ever had to upgrade/reinstall.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For the average consumer, this would help Apple and Google out more than anything. **People want what they know. **

        Exactly, which is why this will probably work, do you really think the average consumer that’s used to Windows is going to switch to Mac when they can just pay 5$/month instead? Lol

        As long as the price isn’t ridiculous like 50$/month or some shit, the average consumer is just going to pay it lolol

        • Veedem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          To start, I don’t think it’ll be a “subscribe or else” type deal. My assumption would be something like a forced S mode unless you subscribe.

          Second, people won’t jump right away. To start, word will get around and they’ll simply not update. Then, when it comes time to buy a new computer, the average user will be possibly swayed to look at entry level MB Airs (They often go on sale for like $750) or Chromebooks.

          The people who will get really pissed will be power users and gamers who will be forced to shell out money to get back features they had in previous versions of the OS.

          • nik0@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly, I don’t even think it’ll be S mode. Just Home really and for pro users they’ll end up with the subscription model

      • Venutianxspring@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup, Chromebooks are already cheap and pretty intuitive, I think this will bump their sales a lot. I’ve ditched windows long ago except for my gaming PC and the PCs at my office (I don’t have a say in those though, I just much prefer Linux

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yup, Chromebooks are already cheap and pretty intuitive, I think this will bump their sales a lot.

          Won’t matter to Microsoft at all. You’ll use your Chromebook to connect your Windows 365 Cloud PC . They’ll add it to the Microsoft Family Plan, same one that has MS Office in it, for free when its introduced and then slowly raise the price as people get embedded into it.

          Gaming? You’ll buy the WinBook Ultra that can handle streaming gaming or buy an Xbox.

          Welcome to the future, it’ll be here in 10 years or less.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Chromebooks generally encourage you to use Google’s family of office apps. So I don’t know about that.

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’ll be a legal battle where MS will claim Google’s closed ecosystem as a monopoly and force them to carry the “MS Cloud PC App” in the Play Store. Or you’ll just go buy a “WinBook” made by HP, Dell, Lenovo, etc…

      • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trust me, it’s already worth it. Literally every other operating system in existence is better than windows. I’d use Temple OS before going back.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          1 year ago

          Caveat: if the software you need is supported. Unfortunately that’s the major reason I haven’t switched

        • H2207@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And a lot of linux programs take inspiration from Microsoft’s design because they’re the norm. When you think of a word processor you think of Word, same goes for all of Office 365 actually.

          • GONADS125@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think of Word 2007. All downhill after that…

            Edit: Or was it 2011? I can’t even remember anymore…

            • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              They implemented the ribbon menu in ~2007 office iirc, somewhen around Vista. 2003 is the old WinXP styled one with all these little menus and buttons, fugly but usable. Is that the one you’ve meant?

              • GONADS125@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                No I think it was 2011. Whatever the stable most streamlined release was before Office 365 rolled out.

              • ourob@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m having to use windows+office for work after a few years of being linux only, and god do I hate modern office’s interface.

                The ribbon, on its own, isn’t super offensive to me - its just a chonky toolbar. But why on earth did they have to get rid of the classic menus?! If I don’t know where a feature is, it’s so much easier to skim through text menus than flipping from ribbon to ribbon, hovering over each button for tooltips, and popping out secondary toolbars of icons to find what I want. It’s maddening for someone who only needs to use office intermittently.

          • Solivine@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think of Google Docs now because the inconvenience of not being able to have word on my own system without a price caused me to use the free alternative.

          • Riskable@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            When you think of a word processor you think of Word.

            Only if you’re a cretin! The only thing one should envision when thinking of a word processor is WordPerfect 1.21a for the Apple IIgs!

            Envisioning Calligra Words is also acceptable.

        • Nelots@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Remove the bloatware with a free program like ShutUp10++, and Windows is a fine OS. Linux may very well be better still, but better enough to go through the effort of switching over, reinstalling everything, relearning everything, finding alternatives to programs, etc.? I doubt it. Not for me at least.

      • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Start trying some of the open source apps on Windows. For example, try using LibreOffice for a bit and see how it compares to Microsoft Office. You may be surprised to find that the difference isn’t as big as you thought.

        • psychothumbs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          LibreOffice works at least as well as Word on its own terms, the problem is how Microsoft deliberately breaks interoperability so you can’t reliably share the documents you create on Libre with people who are going to open them with Word.

          • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolutely. Works great for printing or converting to pdf, though. I just export them to docx anyway and see what happens.

          • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t they both use the open format now? .odt? I haven’t needed to use an office suite for a while, but I would have thought that it would force compatibility.

        • Blaster M@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wish. Try editing a document with tables.

          LibreOffice is fine if all you are doing is writing a Dear Princess Celestia letter, but when you actually start doing advanced things, the jankiness of LibreOffice starts to become wasted effort. If I have to spend more time fighting the program than actually doing work, it’s worth the money for Office. Especially at $70/year for M365, which is roughly 1-3 hours of work depending on what job and such.

          • mbp@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It does the same job but when you’re using it constantly the small QOL things really matter.

              • mbp@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Favorite OS be damned when you have a fiscal consequence. Switching to Linux full time will cost me money at the end of it and I can’t justify that until it costs me more to NOT switch to Linux.

        • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Since most companies are moving their tools to web-based versions, the switch will be even easier.

          Office already has extensive een versions. They’re not entirely there yet, but good enough if you don’t need advanced functionality.

        • idefix@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately the difference is huge. It’s not just the cost of learning a new tool, it’s that 10% of really important features are not there. For me for example it was the ability to apply a theme to an existing presentation in Impress. Well in the corporate world, it’s mandatory.

          Using Linux daily since 99, as my only personal OS since 2013, and still struggling with the office alternatives.

      • SkyeStarfall
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        My biggest argument for Linux is: Windows isn’t going to get better, but Linux will.

      • isles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I started using a lot of the same open-source tools that are on Linux as replacements in Windows to ease the transition. As someone else mentioned, most of the top projects strive to match the workflows of traditional Windows options. Some lemmy instances have huge posts of top tier open source alternatives to most things you need and somethings you don’t.

    • 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been hearing a variant of this since I joined Slashdot in 1999. “Microsoft really messed up this time, mainstream Linux adoption is right around the corner!”

      • sebinspace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, except the Steam Deck has been giving a huge reason to provide compatibility with Linux, and Valve/WINE have been pushing hard as hell to help facilitate it.

        Unity pushed me to go with Godot. Unity already had a Linux editor, but this has pushed me to also move from Photoshop to Krita, since we’re in that kind of mood.

        I tried several games last night that were rated gold or platinum rather than native on ProtonDB. While some people provided launch options, they all worked flawlessly out of the box. I’m even the first person to file a compatibility report for Furry Cyberfucker, let’s fucken go.

        Piper let me configure my mouse and keyboard without the need for GHub. My HOTAS works flawlessly without the Saitek software, since I’m used to configuring buttons in-game.

        I tried this last year, and went back to Windows with the same “it’s not quite there” response as everyone there. But I’ve been keeping an eye on this since I had to use ndiswrapper to get Ubuntu to play nice with my wlan adapter, and this month, I installed PopOS, and have been getting along pretty well. I haven’t encountered a single issue or compatibility that outright breaks this move for me, and I’m generally stubborn as shit to learn new things.

        It may not be the “year of the Linux desktop” for everyone, but it is for me. If you’re expecting some monolithic mass adoption, keep dreaming, but this progress doesn’t seem to be slowing down.

        • King@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, except the Steam Deck

          aaand he replies with a gaming rant. Most users arent children nobody gives a fuck about steam and le wholesome gaben chungus. We want excel and word. Witcher 3 is not a selling point. You live in a teenager reddit bubble.

        • flames5123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have two main concerns with switching. I may eventually switch when these get better.

          1. My mouse shortcuts (Logitech is fully integrated with discord allowing a mute toggle that actually bypasses any keypresses, don’t know if Linus has this as Logitech software on Mac used to be awful)
          2. FFXIV mods: reshade, quick launcher (does work with Linux it says), and ACT (which on windows does a packet capture to parse your damage and has overlays to show that)

          I was just reading that ACT doesn’t work will with overlays on Linux. Here’s hoping though! I can’t for the day when I have a solid free/open source Linux desktop running all my games. One where I’m not afraid to update in fear of breaking. One where I don’t need to use docker to host Overseerr and nginx. One where I have the control like I (mostly) do on my work laptop.

          One day….

          • sebinspace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can’t speak for your FF stuff, that’s outside of my wheelhouse. However, Piper has taken care of my configuration for my G502 mouse and G815 keeb. Even the lighting options work. Will need to re-record your macros, probably.

      • PeutMieuxFaire@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right!

        If I had gotten 10 cent each time I heard (or said) this I would be close to 10 € by now :D
        I switched to Linux back in 2006 but not everyone has the knowledge, the capacity or the motivation to do so.

      • wjrii@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Someday Linux desktop percentage will jump up, but not how the optimists have thought. It’s going to be more because the younger generations don’t think they need desktop operating systems, leaving them exclusively to to younger gen-X, older gen-Y, various hobbyists, and those who need a desktop workflow at work and like it enough to bring it home. The desktop will settle into its niche, like live theater, fountain pens, and a thousand other mass culture relics, and Linux will still be there chugging along while Windows and OS X (as we know them) slowly molder due to reduced profits in the desktop space.

        I have a kid, and yes, there’s a laptop she uses, but to her it’s exclusively for games and for dicking around in Roblox Studio or TinkerCAD. I’ve even seen her close a game, settle into her chair at the very same desk, and pull up Youtube on an iOS device. And this is from a kid who is more comfortable with a PC than most of her peers.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s going to be more because the younger generations don’t think they need desktop operating systems

          We’re already there. The Millennials, and every Generation after them, by and large don’t give two shits about the Operating System, they’re used to working in an App Driven ecosystem…just like your kid.

        • krakenx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It legit could be. When Win10 support ends you have three options:

          1. Buy a new PC with the required TPM chip.
          2. Bypass the check in the Win11 installer and hope the OS functions properly after install and going forward.
          3. Install a fully supported Linux that’s optimized for older hardware.

          None of those three options are easy, and Linux is the only option that’s free and guaranteed to work. Although to be fair most computers made after 2018 have the TPM chip, and so I don’t know how many folks will actually be running 7+ year old hardware at that point. It’s probably more likely to cause a jump in PC sales more than Linux adoption.

          • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Personally, mine has TPM but Windows is complaining that it didn’t give itself enough space in the bootloader to upgrade itself to 11 and this is somehow my fault. I’m debating whether I’ll bother to try troubleshooting it when 10 goes EOL or just move my gaming PC to linux. I do like having at least one Windows machine around for compatibility but it’s getting too annoying to get caught up.

            I’ve been using linux on my laptops and tablets for years so it wouldn’t be a huge hurdle for me to switch.

    • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or folks like myself that refuse to get a TPM just to run a worse OS. I’m fine with Windows 10.

    • KNova@links.dartboard.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m the tech savvy guy in the family. I’ve always said that I keep windows around for gaming and some level of music production. However, if this happens with Windows 12, I’ll move 100% to Linux and deal with the ramifications. Most of my game collection is on Steam which I know has some Linux support now for certain titles.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      if microsoft doing stupid shit with windows affected linux adoption rate, we’d all have switched by now.

      • Spellinbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve played around with Linux before, but never really wanted to use it. I’ve always just been happy with windows. Without a doubt though, if they started a subscription for it. I would switch to Linux.

    • sock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      im really sad to say this because linux bros are cancerous but if they did a windows subscription i would probably have to swap linux…

  • UlrikHD@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t believe for one bit that windows will move to a pure subscription based model. They are greedy, but not stupid.

    What’s more believable is that the base OS will be the same as usual, but if you want fancy AI assistants in your OS, you must subscribe, with the justification being that MS must pay for the servers running the models you’re using.

  • Holyginz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The idea that windows would require a subscription for an OS pisses me off more than I thought.

    Good way for them to guarantee a exodus of people switching their OS.

    • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      But why though? Like, the major complaint people have with Windows now is that it’s starting to advertise. They need to consistently provide updates and security patches, and the consumer has clearly shown it’s willing to pay subscriptions. This is kind of a blending of that. As long as they remove the advertising, and keep their “AI” out of my files I’d actually be happy paying for Windows again just like the “old” days except as a subscription. If it means that every windows install doesn’t come with Candy Crush and other bloatware I’d actually chalk this up as a win for consumers rather than the “free” windows right now that’s ad ridden and full of trackers.

      Of course the realist in me also knows though that they’d fuck it up and make you pay while tracking everything, but I’d rather have an either or.

      • randon31415@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        People hate advertising. That is why people switched over to cable. If you give companies money directly, they won’t have to do ads to make money… just like how cable has no ads! Or Netflix!

  • Goronmon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can anyone confirm that my understanding of the source article is correct?

    The “Windows 12 may require a subscription” is coming from the fact that the word “Subscription” exists in a Windows config file somewhere?

    That seems like a pretty big leap to me. Not that I don’t think it’s impossible that Microsoft would do this, but the evidence here seems thin to say the least.

        • SkyeStarfall
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          militant vegans

          Well, then don’t. But don’t be surprised when things keep getting worse.

        • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They don’t use it because there’s absolutely no need for them to do so when Windows is a fantastic OS for their needs

          The issue has never been whether Windows is a good OS or not. Almost anything you can do with Linux you can also do with Windows[1]. The issue has always been the risk that Microsoft could pull the rug from under your feet and the fact that there’s nothing you can do about it as long as you’re on their platform. You can see all the bullshit that people have had to deal with in the past 10 years as the result of people being comfortable with taking that risk - shitty upgrades, telemetry, ads, and now this. And nobody even knows what other kinds of bullshit they’ll try to pull in the future.

          None of this to say that you have to choose one platform or another. Everything is a calculated risk. Use Windows if that’s what you want, but by this point, it’s clear that you will have to continue with putting up with more and more of this abusive behavior from Microsoft if that’s the choice that you’re making.

          [1]: This is somewhat starting to change though. These days, for a lot of programming- and data science-related tasks, Linux is starting to pull further and further ahead and Windows is becoming more and more unusable.

        • Riskable@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          A Linux user watching someone use (and bitch) about Windows is like watching someone right click to copy & paste.

          If you know of a vast improvement, why would you keep the benefits of better things to yourself?

          Think about how often Windows users bitch about Windows. Think about how many zillions of things they bitch about and how many new things they find to bitch about all the time. Think about how many Windows users say things like, “I love this OS!” or, “This OS is so cool! Look what I can do!”

          Now think about how many Linux users you see bitching about Linux. Think about how many are super excited about it and how many instantly become, “fanatics” practically overnight.

          There’s a reason

        • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For me new Windows releases grow more annoying, slow and counter-intuitive. Switching PCs at work made it mandatory that I went through all ‘bad’ Windows, like Vista and 8, now on w10. Sure, XP-7-w10 weren’t\aren’t that bad, but they all feel worse than the previous one. Nevertheless, I could’ve sticked to one of them, get used to, no problem. But they all get outdated, can’t use X RAM, don’t have DirectX N, aren’t supported with security updates and are blocked from installing latest software.

          Configuring it was very limited too. In W10 I can’t call TotalCMD or other file manager instead of win expoler from other apps. It eats RAM like candies for no reason. Touchscreen interfaces with empty spaces and no right click are everywhere. Undoing telemetry and defender requires know-how or executing scripts, otherwise it’s bloated. Start up times aren’t the best too.

          Linux is a headache and it’s still far from a thing regular PC users would trust without a doubt to handle their usual tasks. The same state Windows slowly comes to, imho. But without being free and insanely customizable. The only things that I need to emulate are superproprietary DRMed products with no alternatives. They are a minority. Most users don’t need them, so they have one less argument against switching.

          That’s my personal account tho. I’m a bit asurprised you like windows as a home system, so I’d want to hear about your positive experience with it if you have some outstanding moments with it.

        • leftzero@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          People don’t use Windows because it’s a “fantastic” OS for their needs. It very evidently is not “fantastic” (or anywhere close) for anyone’s needs but Microsoft’s. People use Windows because it comes bundled with their PCs due to Microsoft’s monopolistic malpractices, and because they can’t get bothered to figure out how to get rid of that bloatware / malware (or, they would get rid of it if possible, but are held hostage by the software — or malware, e.g., Adobe — they need to work only working on Windows, again due to said monopolistic malpractices).

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          When was the last time you used Linux on the desktop? It has come a long way and is getting better every month

        • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not up my own ass enough to proudly declare myself “naturally adventurous,” but I have stayed at a few Holiday Inn Expresses in other towns before. I use Debian and Ubuntu somewhat regularly, but mostly use Windows and MacOS in daily life, and I don’t understand where the “sinking ship” metaphor comes in. Microsoft will attempt this recurring-revenue monetization, and it will either be successful, or it won’t; Windows won’t go away if it isn’t. Otherwise, Apple prints money from its beautifully made consumer-friendly hardware, which also features shockingly good in-house silicon.

          No ships are sinking. This isn’t some grand narrative where Linux awaits us all at the end of personal-computing history.

      • SterlingVapor@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not the problem… The problem is Linux isn’t “normal”. Their work laptop comes with Windows or osx. Their home computer comes with the same.

        Now go tell the average person to install Linux… To them, you might as well be telling them to open up their computer and snip a jumper to make their computer faster. To them, you’re telling them to take their working computer and do something they don’t really understand and is beyond their ability to undo.

        It’s an aftermarket modification to them. If you want to make Linux approachable, it’s really damn simple. Hand them a computer running Linux, with a pretty desktop manager, and a GUI for everything you expect them to do with it. Better yet, add an app store so they can try out software and run updates without feeling intimidated

        My point is, if manufacturers start selling Linux machines again, a lot of people will get on board

        People aren’t opposed to learning, they’re just scared of breaking it, and they need to at least be able to use a web browser without going up a learning curve

    • Billiam@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Humans are creatures of habit. The average user won’t switch until the pain of using what they know outweighs the pain of learning something new + the fear of something new.

    • lustrum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have mint dual booted on my laptop with Win 11. I find myself using Win11 more.

      Idk why, linux mint doesn’t feel finished to me:

      • 120hz won’t work with my dock (works fine in ubuntu and w11)
      • Touchpad scrolling is insanely quick and almost unusable
      • My mouse jitters allover, accelleration or something seems wrong.
      • Can’t seem to set different governors depending on battery or power.
      • Fingerprint doesn’t have a driver (works in Ubuntu ok though).
      • Scaling 125% seems janky, everything is blurry as shit

      It does work mostly ok though and is quick, but it doesn’t feel polished. Ubuntu was great but fuck snap packages.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re using synaptics as the touchpad manager, there is a config element to control the speed of the scroll

        VertScrollDelta and HorizScrollDelta (integer) configures the speed of scrolling, it is a bit counter-intuitive because higher values produce greater precision and thus slower scrolling. Negative values cause natural scrolling like in macOS.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’d certainly convince me. I run windows 11 since my laptop came with it but if I had to pay for my OS I’d run to Linux. The existence of Proton makes it much easier to switch now as well.

    • Fixbeat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I could probably move to Linux now but I have a couple windows applications that connect to audio hardware for configuration. I wonder if such applications would work with Wine…

      • Talaraine@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m in the same boat and have been waffling about it for some time. At least we kind of have a target for when our research needs to be done.

    • ofcourse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Switching to a Linux can be overwhelming. A few distros have made great strides to make most of the OS work right after installing it. But even if there’s only 1% issues due to hardware, drivers, gaming, etc., troubleshooting those issues would often require using terminal and are not accessible to everyone. There’s no customer support to reach out to, and online forums can be difficult to navigate for someone not familiar with coding.

      • Talaraine@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It ‘can’ be overwhelming, yes. I’ve never found, however, so MANY online guides that literally tell you step by step what to enter in the terminal window to succeed. There’s always a learning curve, it’s just about whether or not you want to pay Windows every month to avoid figuring this out. This is why I mentioned Mint specifically, btw. It’s the most user friendly.

    • Billiam@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Microsoft overcharges for Windows anyway. You can go to StackSocial and regularly get Win 11 Pro for $30, when the retail price is $200.

      In any case, everything else tech is moving to SaaS. It’s not hard to believe that MS would “give” out a free (read: ad-laden) version of Windows, with various features enabled depending on tier of subscription. They’ve already got the technology in place with Azure Active Domain and this seems like a logical extension of that.

      • IHawkMike@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not hard to believe that MS would “give” out a free (read: ad-laden) version of Windows, with various features enabled depending on tier of subscription.

        Except that already have that with the Enterprise/SA tier and have for a long time. Sure, Pro is still required but it’s typically an OEM license included in the cost of the hardware.

      • Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It eludes me why people purchase these grey market products over just running unactivated. They’re not valid licenses, they just overcome the technical limitations of non-activation. Generally speaking, you’re supporting criminal enterprise for the sake of being able to change your wallpaper.

        Edit: Truth hurts, I guess.

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      almost zero chance of consumer grade windows requiring a subscription

      And even if they did, fully hacked local install versions would be created… adobe photoshop is subscription only and I see full installs for it all over the place (and I might even have one myself but Im admitting to nothing)

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So yeah, there is almost zero chance of consumer grade windows requiring a subscription.

      Microsoft already has more than 50,000,000 consumers (not businesses) on Office 365 personal or family plans. It’s a small step from there to adding Microsoft 365 Cloud PC to it. With a marketing push people will gladly buy cheap WinBooks to connect in. You can do it NOW if you wanted too, all of the low cost hardware already exists as do the Windows VDs, it’s just not being packaged for and marketed directly to consumers yet.

      I strongly suspect that Windows 12 will come with two licensing models “Install on your own hardware” and “License for Virtual Desktop”. Over time Microsoft will push ever harder to get people to go for the second one. They did it exactly like this with Office and it worked quite well.

  • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have used Windows for a decade now and keep using it because my workflows and the application support are there. But as someone that uses Linux on my server, has tried out Linux desktops, and uses WSL, I can confidently say that I am gone if they start charging me a subscription. It will be annoying as hell but just like leaving Reddit I am willing to give up some niceties to keep my money and my morals.