• Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re running Ubuntu as a server this is useful advice.

    If you’re running Ubuntu as a desktop, just install Fedora instead…

      • LuckingFurker (Any/All)
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Huh, guess when I eventually end up back on Linux I’ll stay away from Ubuntu then. I assume it’s in things like Xubuntu and so on too?

        • RacoonVegetable@reddthat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I personally wouldn’t stay away from Ubuntu just because of petty nerd shenanigans like this one. At the end of the day it’s still a very mature and beginner friendly distro.

          • LuckingFurker (Any/All)
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I used to use it back in the day, I even kinda liked that Unity thing they were doing for a minute. Whenever I end up back there (technically I’m already on Linux because I have a Steam Deck) I’m more likely to look for something lightweight

        • endhits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just use Fedora. In my opinion, it’s the new gold standard for standard use Linux distributions.

          If you really want an Ubuntu base, Pop!_OS is also good. They’re working on making their own desktop environment, which is looking pretty sweet.

    • blackjam_alex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s centralized and controlled by Canonical, it enforces updates and you can’t disable it, sometimes when you uninstall snapd it cames back when you apt update and most importantly, it is painfully slow.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh so it’s the exact kind of enshittification that anyone on Linux went there to escape. Sounds like a deal breaker to me.

      • Oisteink@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        So it’s not about snap, it’s about canonical- and they are why I’m no longer an Ubuntu user. Debian > any downstream distro

  • Solinus 🌿@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    whem/if i do get a computer i’m thinking of dualbooting windows and linux mint (since the only computer I have is a school laptop that runs windows)

    • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s how I started out! It was a pretty decent experience.

      However, I would rate Debian as a slightly better choice over Mint. You see, Mint is a fork of Ubuntu (which is a fork of Debian). So when I needed to troubleshoot an issue, instead of just googling “Linux Mint [my issue]”, I actually sometimes had to google “Ubuntu [my issue]”, or even “Debian [my issue]”, depending on the situation. This is because Mint and Ubuntu share large similarities with Debian, but with certain particular differences; for any given situation, I didn’t necessarily know which differences played a role. This is actually why I switched to Debian; I figured, my experience was going to be basically exactly the same, just with more straightforward troubleshooting.

      If you’re worried about user-friendliness, then the good news is that’s largely to do with your desktop environment (GNOME, KDE, Cinnamon, etc). Whichever one you pick, it will pretty much feel the exact same no matter whether the underlying distro is Debian, Ubuntu, or Mint. Especially because they’re all Debian-based.