• notapantsday@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gambling, tobacco, alcohol and all sorts of other addictive things are for profit, so why exclude cannabis?

      I would advocate for treating other addictions the same way too.

      Alcohol and tobacco ads are targeting young people because they’re more likely to develop a lifelong addiction if you start them early enough. Gambling machines are set up to make people believe they can beat the system, so they stay hooked.

      I just don’t think these should be legitimate business models.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree, as long as it’s well regulated it should be fine to sell at a profit.

      But maybe the problem for legislators is that the definition of well regulated is unknown, as the legalization in itself is kind of an experiment, and we don’t know for sure how it will work out.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree 100%, IMO it’s not that much of an experiment, but when politicians are strongly warned by police, as they are here, I think that makes them cautious, because if it fails, they were warned about it.

          As I see it, legalizing Cannabis would reduce crime, especially help to not finance gangs and organized crime. It’s a no-brainer IMO.