We’re the good guys, they’re the bad guys. Isn’t it?

  • darq@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whenever someone posts this sort of vague “people aren’t tolerating my ideas” post, nine-times-outta-ten, the ideas in question are just awful.

    • speff@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. Biden’s a good president

      2. I like cars

      3. Food isn’t expensive if you buy chicken/pork on sale

      4. Corpo greed / cost cutting / layoffs is driven by ruthless consumer demand for cheaper products over all else. Rather than pointing to faceless organizations looking for a boogieman, people should look in a mirror.

      5. Elections are won by voting

      On some self reflection, #3 and #4 is pretty closely related. Something something no margin for small farmers I think. Ah well, everyone’s a hypocrite - including me.

      • darq@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        1. Subjective. But he’s not the worst.
        2. Liking cars is one thing, but we should not be designing our lives around cars. The more we cater for cars, the worse our living conditions get. The more we treat cars as the primary and required method of transport, the worse our society becomes.
        3. And 4. Individual action alone is simply just ineffective at solving the problems. Focusing on individuals rather than systemic change is the same as doing nothing. If we want to change behaviour, we have to change incentives.
        • speff@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m saying “individual” action is the problem. When an “individual” buys bottled water, or buys some cheap shit from Temu which will break in 2 days, or throws cardboard in the trash instead of recycling, everything becomes just a little bit worse.

          It’s not an individual. Every time you see that word, you can safely multiply it by a couple hundred million and see the actual almost-daily effect of what an “individual” does. A billionaire flying one leg of a private flight 10 miles? Who fucking cares compared to the bigger picture?

          • darq@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Whenever I see conversations like this, I have to wonder, what is your goal? Are you trying to solve the problem? Or are you trying to find someone to blame?

            Because if it’s the latter, then go ahead blame individuals all you like. It’s overly simplistic and ignores the fact that people’s behaviour is shaped by the systems they live under. It’s also completely and utterly useless at actually solving the problem. But by all means, you can waste your time as much as you like, just don’t expect people who actually want to affect change to waste their time humouring such stupidity.

            • speff@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not sure if you’re actually trying to understand what I wrote, but I’m not trying to find someone to blame - I’ve already found them. I’m not trying to effect change - I’d become a politician or teacher if I wanted to do that. These are just observations.

              And it’s interesting that “people who actually want to affect change” wouldn’t want to try to tackle the actual problems. I guess it’s easier to point to single-target big bad entities rather than a more vague entity like…everyone. Also it is easier to pretend people don’t have agency, isn’t it?

              • darq@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not trying to find someone to blame - I’ve already found them.

                … Please consider being a serious person.

                And it’s interesting that “people who actually want to affect change” wouldn’t want to try to tackle the actual problems.

                Wagging your finger at individuals is never, ever going to solve the problem.

                Identifying systemic changes, and advocating for them politically, will.

                I guess it’s easier to point to single-target big bad entities rather than a more vague entity like…everyone.

                Again. You are focusing on blame and pointing fingers. Nobody cares who you want to blame.

                Also it is easier to pretend people don’t have agency, isn’t it?

                Nowhere has I said that people don’t have agency. I said that people’s behaviour is shaped by the systems they live under, which is a trivially true observation.

                So if we want to effect change on a scale large enough to actually make a difference, we will focus on systemic changes.

      • Franzia
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        All of these in the numbered list could add some serious dynamics to conversations on Lemmy. Yeah. You have identified our collective blind spots.

  • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sometimes the bad guys have skulls on their caps and it’s really just that black and white simple.

  • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Using imfglip and linking to it instead of hosting the image somewhere (Lemmy? Imgbb?) definitely makes you one of the baddies.

    Also there’s several variations of this meme that you could have used that don’t use a violent abusers image. Like a similar one with Geordi LaForge from Star Trek.

      • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think they’ve mixed up Drake, the rapper, and Drake Bell, the actor. Though the two look nothing alike, so maybe I’ve missed some news report.

        • Lowlee Kun@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you want to inform us in some words of his missdeeds instead of using a word that has lost all its meaning by now? No offense but if i would hate everyone that was called a groomer by someone on the web i would literally hate every single person in the world because thats where we are with “groomer” right now.

            • Lowlee Kun@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Have you red that article of yours? He might be a creep but this is NOT grooming. Maybe stop using that word as it means something completely different.

              • Dating an 18 year old, when you’re 31, who you’ve known for few years isn’t grooming. Sure buddy.

                And another 17 year pld says that dude in his mid-30s is a ‘good friend’?

                Pretty fucking sus pattern lmao.

                • Lowlee Kun@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “Preparing a person for a position requiring skilled behavior, especially by providing opportunity for practise and guidance in making the right decisions.” Now id like to see how knowing a person is the same as preparing the person, in this case, for a sexual relationship. The act of grooming minors entails to prepare them for sexual acts in order for the abuser to have a willing object for their sexual gratification.

                  What you are having a problem with, and i would even say rightfully so, is the power imbalance between these people. Power imbalance can have many sources, lika age gap, power or wealth. Not sure which is the biggest factor here. But again, calling it grooming simply is the worst way to adress the problem you actually want to talk about and it is hurting victims of actual grooming. Just like calling the GOP a bunch of groomers when you would need to adress the corruption and their obvious steps towards dismantling the democracy. It is helping the offenders by derailing the whole conversation without offering any actionable steps.

      • rbhfd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        For me (using Jerboa), it automatically opens in an external browser instead of just opening the image in app.

        Other apps might not have this issue though. Not sure why OP made the remark.

  • krashmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    While there’s definitely some of that going on, the people I usually see complaining about this kind of thing are not interested in the fair exchange of ideas. Rather, they’re upset that one of their dumb opinions got made fun of in a public forum.

  • BOMBS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    yeah, im this 🤏 close to unsubscribing from any news related communities. the comments are mostly repetitive circle-jerks and antagonistic in-fighting. it’s really affecting my time on here.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      So many people seem to genuinely think they shouldn’t need to pay rent or work. Or that their employer should pay for their commute.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        With how unnecessary it is sometimes to be in the office with teleworking and losing my time commuting, that would be a way for employers to think twice before asking someone to come in, and give some kind of compensation to those who can’t work from home.

      • darq@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean. Both of those things seem like pretty reasonable positions to discuss. They way you write that seems to imply that rent and work are simply facts of life, but they don’t have to be. Or at the very least, they could look a lot different to how they do now.

        Rent is an economic concept that doesn’t have to exist. In fact it’s not hard to make the economic argument that it should not exist. Rent-seeking is generally considered a bad thing, because it removes value from a system.

        Work is harder to get away from. But there’s no reason work has to look like how employment does today. And there’s a productive discussion around how much work is reasonable, especially as automation continues to advance.

      • DreamButt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Personally I don’t think that companies should be responsible for taking care of people… because that’s the governments responsibility. We are rapidly approaching a situation where people will be automated out of work faster than we can invent new arbitrary things for them to do. UBI is inevitable it’s just a question of when and how

  • darcy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    no you dont understand!!! my opinion is correct, and anyone who dares to question it is automaticay one of the bad guys!!!

  • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    My favourite part of Lemmy is seeing enlightened centrists posting to Lemmy.ml thinking it’ll be sympathetic to any other ideology than socialism/communism.

    • YashaB@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Oh look an Enlightened Centrist post. I thought you morons all stayed with Reddit.”

      Thank you for proving my point. And in such a colorful way!

      • steakmeout@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your point is moronic. You guys think you’re being reasonable and finding the middle when all that’s happening is you’re being pipelined into fascism with some extra steps.

    • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re not, boss. You’re my childhood friend that saved me from a gang of rabid wombats and I would follow you forever using my unique skills to defeat your enemies in turn based combat.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    The top part of the meme is actually a reason I like instances that don’t defederate from other instances. It allows me to see what those I disagree with and/or just don’t like might be saying/thinking at a certain period.

    • Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I too am an enlightened centrist, I must see both sides, for neither is annoying enough without the other

  • clayt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s simple, the guys I like are the good ones, and the ones I don’t are bad.