• rckclmbr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m liberal, but holy shit the division from that happening would make Obama and Trump seem like warmups

        • flossdaily@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          65
          ·
          1 year ago

          No… Don’t you see?

          No matter how centrist or moderate democratic candidate is, the Republicans call them communist, socialist pedophiles.

          They’ve painted themselves into a corner. We could nominate a full-on Marxist flag-burner, and they would have nothing left to say about them that they didn’t already say about Obama and Biden.

          • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Let’s be fair, Nancy P is about as much a back slapping old school politician as you can get, and AOC fell in line to her leadership. AOC and the squad haven’t been as left as promised

            • flossdaily@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              AOC pulls the party to the left with her rhetoric, and then lends her support to strengthen the party as a whole.

              In this political environment, when the opposition is literally a fascist cult, it’s great that she’s being a team player.

              Also when she eventually does run for president, she won’t have alienated the party.

              She has handled it perfectly.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          You say that like the person even matters. As long as there is a D next to their name the other side will act like the world is ending. Literally.

        • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am not an American, so I have to ask: Is AOC really that radical? To me she looks like a left leaning liberal with the most radical idea being MMT. Other then that it is normal talking points of a left leaning politican.

          • cerement@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 year ago

            any other country would view AOC and Bernie as centrist at best – but our Overton window has shifted so far right that centrist is seen as full-on revolutionary communist …

            • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              I honestly thought they were some European style social democrat types, but then I looked up their climate policies and turns out Macron has actually passed more radical climate laws then the two of them are even proposing. It is insane how Americans believe that two politicans would be revolutionary communist, when a former investment banker turned neoliberal politican is more radical then them.

            • Breadman
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Where does the idea come from Bernie would be seen as a moderate outside of the US? He openly ran as a communist when he was a mayor. His policies are far to the left to any social-democratic party in Europe.

        • mrpants@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m liberal but the first thing that comes to mind about this advancement is something negative. I would prefer a negative peace, an absence of conflict, to a positive peace. I’m a liberal.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 year ago

    she applauded the climate movement for starting to “crack the grip” which the fossil fuel industry holds on the nation’s political economy.

    “That’s because of you,” she said to those in the crowd. “Don’t let the cynics win. The cynics want us to think that this isn’t worth it. The cynics want us to believe that we can’t win. The cynics want us to believe that organizing doesn’t matter; that our political system doesn’t matter; that our economy doesn’t matter. But we’re here to say that we organize out of hope! We organize out of commitment! We organize out of love! We organize out of the beauty of our future! And we will not give up. We will not let go! We will not let cynicism to prevail!”

  • Nonameuser678@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    1 year ago

    In Australia we’ve just essentially criminalised climate protesting. Climate protestors now risk a huge fine and even jail time. A lot of people suspect it’s because governments are preparing in advance for what might become a huge movement that they can’t control. So they’re trying to disincentivise people before shit hits the fan.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds about right. Sadly for them, no manner of law is going to stop the mobs when people start going hungry.

    • mayo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I went to a climate protest in Canada last week and it was way to tame to actually get anything accomplished.

      The main part of the protest was walking down a main artery. For protesters, there is incentive to walk slowly and spread out to make the walk longer and disrupt status-quo longer, but the organizers clearly only had permission to march for a specific duration so they were in the back hurrying people forward so we’d stay within our allotted time window. Maybe 30 minutes. Once a year. It was pointless.

      Add to that that 90% of the people there were exactly the people you’d expect to be there and it just felt like a waste of time.

  • Vaggumon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is an exception to every rule, and one of my rules is that all politicians are money grubbing, ego-maniacs, who want nothing more than power. She might be the only exception to that rule.

        • imgonnatrythis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agree that humble beginnings stories probably make for better politicians (she’s far from the first though), but the drive to tolerate years of political bullshit is almost always a personal power quest and indoctrination into a corrupt system makes for corrupt individuals. The expectation from prior data would be for her to follow this route. I will disagree with you that she doesn’t care about power (and shit).

  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile, here in the UK, Ministers consider rollback of green policy to try to win votes from those who really should not vote Tory.

  • wick@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure she realises how good conservatives, and the American public, are at ignoring things.

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    She should be Americas VP, so she could take over for Brandon when he croaks. Probably the only way we’ll ever get a female president.

    • cerement@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No tolerance for intolerance.

      EDIT:

      • No unity with fascists.
      • “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge’.” —Isaac Asimov
    • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, 98% of people agree most people can’t agree on anything. So good luck with that strong all unifying movement…around not having a strong unifying movement, lol.

  • librechad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get why people support AOC, as far as I can tell after she blatantly ignored New Yorkers who are fed up with the current migrant crisis. She’s not open for debate, she’s just pushing her own agenda.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t it strange that they keep re-electing her? Could it be that… her agenda is their agenda? That “New Yorkers who are fed up with the current migrant crisis” aren’t the majority?

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          You obviously have spoken with the majority of citizens and know their opinions? If only there was some way for citizens to choose who represents them… some way for all citizens to decide if the “agenda” of their representative conforms to their own…

    • Armen12@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      So she ignored racists, doesn’t sound like a bad thing for her to do.