The “cord cutting” trend cable execs spent a decade claiming was a fad just broke another round of new records. According to Leichtman Research, major cable TV providers lost another 1.7 million subscribers last quarter, as users flock to streaming, over the air TV, TikTok, or, you know, books. Roughly 17,700 customers cut the cord every single day during the second quarter of 2023.

Over the last year (Q2 ’22 to Q2 ’23) the traditional cable TV sector lost a whopping 5,360,000 customers, compared to 4,235,000 customer defections the year earlier. The current number of U.S. households that has a cable connection sits somewhere around 46 percent, down from 73% at the end of 2017.

Historically, a big cable company like Comcast or Charter wasn’t too hurt by “cord cutting” because it could just jack up the cost of monopolized broadband access. And while that’s still generally true; here too cable giants are seeing increased competition from community broadband (co-ops, utilities, municipalities), 5G home wireless, and phone companies belatedly upgrading to fiber.

Interestingly though, streaming TV providers also wound up losing subscribers, albeit at a much slower rate:

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have cable TV because Comcast is the only viable ISP in my area (for now) and they simply won’t sell Internet without TV. It’s either both, or deal with slow, spotty internet.

      Can’t wait for my city’s fiber rollout to get to my neighborhood.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        2 years ago

        and they simply won’t sell Internet without TV

        too bad antitrust law isn’t enforced on this illegal bundling

      • Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        same here. i can pay 120 for cable tv and internet at 250mbps, or 100 for internet that is 50mbps.

        but my town is a monopoly. i have zero other internet/cable choices.

      • Old_Dude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Must be a regional thing. Comcast has always had separate cable and intenet packages where I’m at.

        • radix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          2 years ago

          They definitely tailor their offers to the market. The minute work on the city network began, Comcast suddenly figured out how to quadruple speeds at a given price.

          Pure coincidence, surely!

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        old people who have been subscribers forever leave it on while they cook dinner, not really caring about the quality of programming, which is basically just filler anymore

      • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.socialBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        -Older, more conservative people.
        -People who watch sports who are not aware of other options.
        -And people who have bundled services and either have to take the bundle.to get decent Internet speeds or who have persuasively priced bundles.

    • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t have cable, but know someone who does. The only reason they still have it is for sports broadcasts.

      • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        They must be going crazy hard on sports. Between ESPN+ (bundled with Disney+ and Hulu for $15 or $20 a month), PeacockTV ($6 a month), and Paramount+ ($6 a month) I get quite a bit of live sports thrown in with all that non-sports content for under $40 a month). You may say, but Fox Sports network! Well you can open an incognito window, go over to https://foxsports.com/live, and get an hour for free and you can [Google] Cast (I assume Airplay works but have no Apple devices) it to your TV. Just close the incognito window (all incognito windows for Chromium, not just the tab) and open a new one, your 1 hour starts over!

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          ESPN+ doesn’t have their cable channels. Peacock and Paramount just stream what you can get free with an antenna.

  • kingshrubb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 years ago

    Went over my friends house and there was a movie on the TV on cable. It would have taken 4 hours to watch that movie with the amount of ads they cram in. It was unwatchable. Paying to watch ads? Nah.

    • infrasoundxp@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is exactly why I can’t justify paying for cable nowadays, broadband only. Paying to watch ads… Blech

    • coyootje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I usually just end up recording them if I really want to watch them so I can fast forward through the commercials when I watch it later.

  • ThatHermanoGuy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Seriously? 46% is so damn high! I have a hard time believing that. Is it just because there are so many baby boomers still out there or what? I can’t imagine paying for commercials. The last time I had cable was 16 years ago.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I want to watch my local NBA team and would prefer not to pirate it, cable package it is. I get enough odds and ends elsewhere in the package to juuuust justify it.

      If it were $10 more a month, though…

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    I bet it also fluctuates pretty widely with football season. I only pay for streaming TV for football season and I know many others do too.

    There is otherwise absolutely no benefit.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Recently my wife and I were talking about which streaming services we should stop paying for and we realized it’s been about 15 years since we “cut the cord.” I remembered because we decided to stop paying for Hulu (among others) and were talking about how when we first discontinued cable we wouldn’t have been able to do so without Hulu.

    • Maximilious@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I just cut off our Hulu with the recent price hike and we also started out with Hulu. We share a family plan for Disney+ and sail the high seas for anything else. Having an OTA antenna with an HD Home run is also a plus.

  • Mr_Buscemi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wonder how many of those 46% were like me at my old apartment.

    They included cable tv in the monthly rent so I technically was a household that subscribed but I never once connected my tv to it lol.

  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    i had cable for reception. live in an area without adequate reception of ‘local’ stations without tall antennas and boosters. had it. they raise the price and raise the price, and move channels to separate ‘tiers’ that cost even more. well, they did it one too many times.

    of course two months after, and having gotten used to it not on my bill anymore… they go and do the last bit of the summary in op… they raised the price of internet.