The landlord had told them he wanted to raise the rent to $3,500 and when they complained he decided to raise it to $9,500.

“We know that our building is not rent controlled and this was something we were always worried about happening and there is no way we can afford $9,500 per month," Yumna Farooq said.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, the only two options are capitalism and full on Chinese dictatorship communism.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So, this is a testy thread, but if you have a specific idea of what you do want I’m very interested. Capitalism is a weird solution but other than old-school communism (which was honestly a series of kludges masquerading as a solution) I’ve yet to hear another solution described in detail.

          • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You should examine the social and economic structures of the Anarchist governed areas in Ukraine and Spain during their respective civil wars.

            It wasn’t a given that Socialist movements should be Authoritarian. Lenin bears most of the blame for that (the bastard); Marx some.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I actually have looked into that. From what I can tell they never really had a well-defined economic structure, since building up the economy bigger isn’t a consideration when fighting for your existence, and used a market system for basic purchases of supplies. Modern Rojava is the same way.

              The Republicans were pretty close to winning from what I’ve heard, and if I could see parallel universes what they would have settled on after a victory would be one of the first few things I’d be interested in.

              • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure, they used mixed economics.

                The main point is that used mainly collectivist economics, and did so without establishing authoritarian societies.

        • terath@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There is also Soviet communism, Cuban communism, and North Korean communism. I’m sure one of those countries will happily welcome you with lovely high quality public housing.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t disagree but what we need is stability. So far capitalism has given the US that. If you’re proposing a different system fine just make sure that while we move to it the perceived wealth of the country doesn’t take a hit and after it is implemented do the same.

      I don’t think it is possible from here. What we really need is loads more regulation and Corp criminals going to prison to start.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Largest gdp and arguably most stable economy of scale on the planet what are you talking about?
          See this is what I’m talking about. Just devoid of reality

          • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Coal Wars, Conscription, Red scare, Segregation, Civil Rights Oppression, Violence, Drug War, international chaos and war.

            What are you talking about?