• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Stupid screenshot has the Eye icon on the image which hides the burning trees.

    • not_IOOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      hardly anyone can afford to live like this

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I never get this ‘we’ who is ‘we’?

    We as in a collective of people making decisions, we wouldn’t blind ourselves if we were a we making some decisions collectively.

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    “We” (or “most people”) is what people use when they want to make their statement more powerful. Ironically it actually makes it weaker and less relatable than if they picked someone specific or themselves.

    • not_IOOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      yeah I’m not doing any of that shit, don’t drag me into your shitty late stage capitalism life style

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Until they get the water bill, sure.

      But part of the problem with the cartoon is that it makes climate change an individualist problem rather than an industrial problem. You yell at this couple for daring to have a little slice of normal without asking what their alternatives were. If everything is cookie-cutter homes scattered across Arizona desert, where else do I live? If the HOA says I need to have a lawn or eat fines every month, how do I avoid running my sprinkler? If I’m born into a wasteland and I’m raised to believe wasteland life is normal, why would I behave any differently?

      Nevermind that Company Co built imported from overseas via cheap manual labor the house and the walls and the grill and the sprinkler and the big blinders, in order to get this family to spend 40 hrs a week turning out surplus value for their shareholders. Who really benefits from this arrangement?

  • whodatdair
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Like a Phoenix (AZ), it’ll rise from the Ashes and die of thirst

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If there’s nothing more I can do about it why would I torture myself with constant news about how the world is ending? It’s been doing that for years and nobody wants to work together to actually solve the problem.

    Ignorance may not be bliss but it’s a hell if a lot nicer way to live than constantly knowing there’s a massive existential threat that nobody is taking any meaningful action on.

    Because the #1 most effective thing you can do to fight climate change is “eliminate” people in the developed world. Anyone making more than about $40,000 a year is contributing disproportionately to climate change.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      nobody wants to work together to actually solve the problem

      Quite a few people want to work together to solve the problem. But they have no access to the capital or the policy that created the problem.

      All the turkeys agree that the Turkey Farmer is a big threat. But they’re mostly busy just staying fed. They have no free time, no surplus income, and no material capacity for resistance. If the Turkey Farmer sees a turkey getting too far out of line, its killed and eaten. So nobody wants to stick their necks out.

      Because the #1 most effective thing you can do to fight climate change is “eliminate” people in the developed world. Anyone making more than about $40,000 a year is contributing disproportionately to climate change.

      That’s an absurd and self-defeating take. “If you want to fight climate change, fucking go kill yourself” isn’t a rallying cry anyone is going to get behind and it certainly isn’t going to cut carbon emissions at a global scale. FFS, go through Florida and straight up do a holocaust of every suburban neighborhood on the peninsula. See if that shifts the needle on the emissions by any of the LLM Factories even one iota. See if it cuts the volume of concrete being poured in Dubai or the natural gas pumped out of the Permian Basin. See how much of the Amazon grows back - or hell, how much of the Everglades for that matter - when you’re done.

      Nevermind that the only people we’re doing genocide against are the global poor. It’s the Gaza refugees who are getting purged, not the Hotwives of Atlanta, Georgia. Russian and Ukrainian lumpen proles are lining up to shoot one another, not Berlin industrialists or London bankers or Moscow Oligarchs. The folks getting rounded up and executed in Sri Lanka and Kashmir and Myanmar aren’t the ones emitting all the waste.

      All these “Exterminate the Brutes” insinuations achieve is another round of capitalist-orchestrated eugenics campaigns. If you can’t see a path towards the working class living within their ecological means, you’ll never mobilize a labor powered environmentalist movement against the folks profiting off ecological destruction.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You’re exactly right: We are entirely fucked no matter what we do, because even if every American dropped dead tomorrow it would still not be enough to stop climate change.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          We are entirely fucked no matter what we do

          Modern industrial countries exist with far lower emissions per person. We’re not screwed no matter what. We can - and other countries have - modernized to get under the line.

          You don’t need to die to get your emissions under post-90s emission rates.

          • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Far lower emissions per person, but far greater emissions overall because there’s so many more people.

            And we’re gonna blow right by 1.5 degrees and maybe hit 2 or 2.5 degrees. That’s pretty fucked.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Far lower emissions per person, but far greater emissions overall

              Aspiring to the emissions rate of Qatar because so few people live there is a call for genocide not environmental reform.

              And we’re gonna blow right by 1.5 degrees and maybe hit 2 or 2.5 degrees.

              Not thanks to India, where 1.4B people have managed to keep their gross emissions rate well under their 350M peers in the United States. But for some reason Americans will tell you the solution is to nuke Delhi to cover the balance.