• positiveWHAT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I was thinking of letting the victim’s close ones do what they want to the demons for one day, but I’m not sure what that would do with their psyche afterwards.
        E: The psyche of those doing the retribution.

        • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do beleive in restorative justice but I do wonder ocassioanlly if we haven’t gone too far into the concept that vengeance has zero place in justice

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t. It’s far more punishing and even that is far too little to throw them in a cell and lose the key. Let them sit there for endless years until they die. Done.

      • Etterra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I prefer a 3m steel cube, welded shut, with a poop hole, a human-sized gerbil spout for water, and a hole for gruel to be pumped in twice a day. No clothes, bedding, or even a bowl for the gruel.

    • shinyLane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not for nothing, but in the US, the pedophiles that end up in the prison system are very likely to experience hell on earth as the other inmates will certainly not be a fan of theirs. It’s like some criminal pecking order. I have no idea if that’s a thing outside the US, but maybe…

      • jasory@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is almost certainly a myth. Prisons are full of rapists and pedophiles, nobody cares. The only actual code of ethics criminal organisations have is no snitching or defrauding because it hurts them, that’s all they care about.

          • jasory@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If a claim is made that anecdotal evidence is incorrect then presenting anecdotal evidence does not refute that claim. Even worse your sources basically say that it’s not really a big deal, because it isn’t. Criminals really don’t care what you have done so long as you don’t hurt them.

            • shinyLane@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, and you have presented a giant pile of conjecture, followed it up with a bunch of judgment, and then made a major effort to let us know how much insight you have, without actually providing any insight. Way to go, Jasory!

              Even a bit of personal experience goes further than a pile of conjecture spewed from an internet “know it all.”

              • jasory@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                On what basis do you determine that my claims are not sourced? You have no information that my claims are less credible than those of the interview subjects. They are both unsupported and anecdotal at the worst; however you can actually find information on prison socialisation in academic papers and they largely support my claims. Swindlers are treated worse than sex offenders because this idea of moral code among criminals doesn’t really exist, they only care if you harm them directly.

                “Made a major effort to know how much insight you have”

                Where? Do you even understand what this sentence you wrote even means? Until this reply, I never claimed having a source of insight or argued for why my statement is correct. I merely made a statement that the common notion of “honor among thieves” doesn’t really exist, and personal stories aren’t sufficient to prove that it does. I do have personal experience with this, so technically my claims have just as much basis as the random people interviewed. However this is irrelevant because there are better sources than personal stories.

                Additionally if you think that anything in this discussion is a “major effort”, you have abysmally low standards. Writing one or two paragraphs is highly trivial.

                • shinyLane@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You made a profound statement, almost of fact. “This is almost certainly a myth”. This is your argument statement, it’s your conjecture and your major effort to show the audience your insight.

                  Stop back peddling.

                  You presented no sources of any kind, and then you started turning things into a research paper where I needed to submit my work in MLA format for the professor. I gave you people’s experiences; you replied with a mouth full of shit (conjecture) with no basis of any kind other than your claimed philosophical knowledge.

                  No, sir, you seem to have a very, very high opinion of your intelligence. You are also very insecure with this opinion. Just one glance at your social history shows how hard you try to let everyone know how much higher your intellect is than theirs. It’s problematic when you spout unfounded conjecture as fact; it’s worse when you believe the bullshit coming out of your shit box.

                  I don’t give two fucks how many papers on thieves you have written, or what your criteria are for the conversation because the first two sentences out of your mouth are pure elitist garbage. Go back to your hole of correcting the internet Jasory, I have no time for your bullshit.

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not enough. Too easy. I prefer to give this people years of torture under constant medical control

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In what fuckin universe does that even make sense. How dull does the mind have to be to justify this? I couldn’t chop an arm off of someone I hate, let alone a kid. Let alone all the other insert word to describe this horror.

      • xeddyx@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not too familiar with India’s politics, but what does the BJP have to do with this incident? And how will changing parties solve these issues - is there any political party in India that’s actually good and not corrupt? I heard corruption is pretty common across all of the government sector, regardless of the party in power?

        • ruford1976@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          63
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everything. They incite violence using the fragility of our enviornment. They fund terrorists like RSS and VHP to supress minorities and make the environment more patriarchal according to hindu scriptures. some parties are corrupt but BJP is the most corrupt and it is trying to increase it more because more corruption = more hindu extreamism = more votes.

        • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          1 year ago

          Congress is corrupt, but they’re just corrupt, they don’t care about much beyond self-enrichment.

          The BJP is MAGA on crack with 500x as much religious zealotry pitched in.

          Muslim genocide isn’t that outrageous to them, there were several instances where they rallied to butcher Muslims in the past.

          • Carlos Solís@communities.azkware.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            And to make things worse, the religious conflicts are also political conflicts, because of the Muslim-majority parts of India eventually splitting into Pakistan and later Bangladesh. As a result, nationalist Indians want all Muslims to be deported to either of those places, as they consider them fundamentally incompatible with the national faith and culture, which for them are one thing and the same.

            • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Let’s be honest, they want them deported “for now”.

              Later it’ll turn back into needing those lands back for “Greater Bharat(India)!!”.

              Ultranationalists are never original.

          • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep, both sides-ing is a terrible argument, and it becomes clear when you see the difference in these things. Capitalism is terrible, capitalism boosted by bigotry is a whole another evil

      • punseye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        wtf has this got to with the ruling party?! you think rapes will stop happening if your favorite party came to power?!

  • thefloweracidic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m earnestly asking any Indian folks why I’ve seen too many articles like this coming out of India. Why is it so unsafe for women in that country? Sexism? Regressive beliefs around sex?

    • Lem453@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      95
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Whatever country you are from, think about the most backwards/rural/remote location that has people with backwards and regressive views.

      Consider that India likely has 5 to 10x the population of rural folks in small villages that have midevil views compared to your country.

      Add in long standing cultural misogynist views that is so pervasive it fully permeates all aspects of government and life and you quickly get to a point where abuse and domestic violence is tolerated.

      As per usual, it’s not like the entire country shares these views. It’s just the the number of backwards views in India is numerically huge because of its population.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, I don’t know. But then again I never felt like I belong here for as long as I can remember.

      Places like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan are so regressive that other Indians collectively call them BIMARU (sick or unwell).

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s important to remember what a big place it is. A billion people. A lot can happen. And it may not be some essential quality of the entire country. I mean hell you can’t judge all of America by Mississippi.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t know about this kind of maiming women but there are definitely moments when I see Europeans, for example, ask “why is America so fucked up?” after they learn about something that went down in Missouri.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the fuck is wrong with these people? What has to be going through your head to even think about doing this?

  • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    From actually reading the piece, this headline is wrong. It should read “Gang-raped 14 year old was burned alive then cut to pieces”

    Which actually makes more sense

    For transparency, it says that she was alive when she was burned, and the body was recovered from more than one location and this made the investigation harder.

    So I have then concluded that she was burned alive and then cut to pieces, rather than cut to pieces alive and then burned.

  • ruford1976@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Look at the flithy faces of perpetrators. these are the filthy people who did it. may they rot in jail. also fuck BJP

    • UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Put each in a 5x5 cell with a light that never goes out. No human contact, just them alone with their thoughts for the rest of their miserable lives.

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not recommended to give any attention to perpetrators, that’s what they desire.

    • Rose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s offensive to the animals to be comparing them to humans. No non-human animal would have been this cruel.

      • theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you ever sat around and watched ducks?

        Bastards, I tell ya.

        I’ve seen the female mallard with half of her feathers removed, floating face down in the water dead, all while the males continue to gang rape her for hours.

        Maybe we should compare people like this to ducks.

        • Rose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Assuming that’s exactly what you saw, at best you can compare it to necrophilia, not being burned alive in a furnace.

          • theangryseal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh no no no. She was very much alive when they started.

            I heard the horror from my bedroom window. See, I had a creek in my back yard, and across from that creek was the only stretch of land that wasn’t a mountain. It wasn’t a big stretch either.

            I looked out the window and I seen her running in absolute horror, “QUACK! QUACK! QUACK!” They got her three at a time, sometimes more. They started with the feathers on the back of her neck. She was running around with a bloodied, naked, neck. Then they held her down and started ripping feathers from everywhere. She ran for the water and tried to swim away. One by one they held her head under water while another climbed on her back holding her by the skin of her bleeding neck. Feathers flew. She’d get her head up to quack a quack of terror, and they’d dip her back in.

            It wasn’t long until she was floating with her face in the water. The rape went on for hours after that.

            Can’t proofread, have toddlers.

            Have a good night.

            • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Now its your duty to put down those other bastard ducks. String them up from the lamppost as a warning to the other bastard ducks who live nearby.