• Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    6 days ago

    Pfft, you think we invaded everyone for spices to eat them? Absolutely not. We did it so that we could sell them to the French, thereby making the French poorer by exploiting their degenerate addiction to food that tastes nice

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Your comment made me wanna google the two economies and related stats. They’re a lot more Similar than I expected. Pretty cool. So I guess UK’s plan failed? xD unless France used to be richer.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        While I was joking, of course, France’s economy actually was quite a lot more bigger and more powerful than the UK’s up until the industrial revolution and the about a century of everything going very badly for France. France was the most populous country in Europe by a wide margin, and back then that basically was the whole economy. It has quite a lot more land than the UK, and that land is a lot more productive too; the north of Wales and most of Scotland do not make for good farmland. Unlike Germany and Italy it united and centralised quite early, and it just outweighed Spain and the Low Countries the same way it did the UK, so for a long time France had the edge over all of its neighbours.

        During the Napoleonic wars, France managed to raise forces that matched the UK, Prussia, Austria, and Spain combined in number. Some of that was due to other factors like how he organised it, but you’ve still got to have the people available somewhere if you want to match four major powers at once

      • FundMECFS
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        That website is so neoliberal brained it makes me want to puke.

        “Property Rights Index” “Investment Freedom Index”

        What’s next? “Oppression of Working Classes Index”

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        There’s plenty of British-created curries or ones that have been heavily modified in the UK. If you went to India and wanted a tikka masala. I imagine it would be pretty hard to find one, and if you did it wouldn’t be like it was in the UK.

        Personally I do prefer Indian curries because they get more interesting with the veggie ones though.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          I understand why Europeans don’t like pineapple pizza, for some reason all the restaurants here put it on after baking. Genuinely insane

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Stole it? I think adopted is more apt. And curry isn’t one thing and varies from region to region in India. But Britain loved it so much that there is an Indian (or Pakistani) restaurant practically everywhere. And while Indian / Pakistani chefs have invented new dishes (e.g. chicken chasni is the best goddamned curry ever), I wouldn’t call it cultural appropriation.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    British people love curries and other spicy things. For most people curries, biriyanis are going to be in the rotation. Even “traditional” British food will usually have things like black pepper, nutmeg, mace, ginger, cumin, cloves, mustard, bay leaves, juniper berries in it. More recently cumin, paprika, tumeric, coriander, curry powder might be thrown into dishes.

  • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    You need spices for mince pies and fruitcake. Worcestershire sauce and HP sauce. Cakes and sauces basically.