• AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      17 days ago

      I had a look further into this, because I wanted to better understand what factors might cause an act to be considered indecent exposure (or outraging public decency). This led me to some guidance on naturism and other non-sexual nudity, from the crown prosecution service.[1] It appears that having an “intention to cause alarm or distress” may be relevant for protests like this — arguably the entire point of the protest is to use the shock value of the nudity as a protest.

      That being said, I think it’s a bold move and possibly an effective protest. Even if public indecency laws are gender neutral, it would still be a strong message if any of these women got arrested for this — the reason why these women are capable of causing alarm or distress by going topless is because these are “female presenting nipples” (to use a heavily-memed phrase from the Tumblr porn ban era)



      1. 1 ↩︎

      • LadyButterflyshe/her@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        Yes it would also come under some public order offences. Bottom line is, the legal def of woman wasn’t the reason they didn’t get arrested.