• TotallynotJessicaM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “Jesus saves horny catboys too!” or “Jesus saves, horny catboys too!”? The second is far more based, so I need to know.

    • froufoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Jokes aside, this is part of my “propaganda” posting when I’m shifting mainstream religious narratives from conservative to liberal. I cannot imagine the world without religion, as human beings tend to be spiritual, but i can imagine religion to be ethical and open-minded as in certain European countries nowadays

      • rozwud@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I cannot imagine the world without religion, as human beings tend to be spiritual

        I’m curious about this. I was raised somewhat religiously, but at this point, I can’t imagine myself with religion, or spirituality, or any of it. Why do you think it’s so essential?

        • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think it depends on how you frame ‘spirituality’. Love for example can never be meaningfully measured empirically, it’s a spiritual truth. You just know it. It cannot be reliably be proven or disproven, especially across different people.

          I don’t think the line between ‘I truly believe in love’ and ‘I truly believe in god’ is as crisp as people would like to believe. That’s not at all to say they’re the same thing, but they’re more similar than a lot of people want to accept.

          • rozwud@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I personally don’t think something is spiritual just because it can’t be measured.

        • froufoxOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          One individual can live with religion or spirituality in religious form, but not humanity as a whole. There were experiments in totalitarian countries to violently exterminate religion, they didn’t end up well. Usually it’s brainwashing and freedom of conscience denial

          • rozwud@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Oh I’m certainly not advocating for forcing anyone to get rid of their religion (I’m not advocating for anything at all). It just struck me as interesting that you can’t imagine a world without it.

      • TotallynotJessicaM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Humanity does need spiritual fulfillment, but it does not need Christianity. Christianity has long been influenced by powerful empires that used it for social control. As long as it is “Christianity,” enterprising forces will use the tribe to drive people away from the actually decent values it may have had. Despite the tale of the “good Samaritan” literally warning about this, Christians as a whole have never learned. People will continue to think that worship is a substitute for being a good person.

        • froufoxOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Would disagree here. There is no such thing as “Christians as a whole”. There are different denominations whose beliefs could be almost opposite. I heard that in the US, on one side, there’s the conservative Catholic church, and various protestants who usually are even more conservative. Yet even there, one woman bishop stood up for trans kids before Trump. But in my city (I live in Finland) the mainstream Evangelical church is presented on pride parades. I’m not overly concerned about church as an institution—what worries me is that religious oppressed minorities feel additional pressure from the left-wing atheists. That’s terrble imo. I’m not a religious myself and don’t go to church, but my rule is simple: You’re christian, or muslim, or buddhist, etc? Fine. You’re bigot? Fuck you.

          • TotallynotJessicaM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            My problem with even the best denominations of Christianity is how they effectively replace a possible love for oneself with the “reciprocated” love of God. They receive love from God by giving love to God; it’s part of what makes faith so powerful. It’s hard to love oneself in all your faults, but it’s easier to love another and to receive love in return. Of course, this makes you reliant on God for you mental health, making it very hard to escape the relationship if it is abusive.

            This does not mean I dislike Christians who are good people for what they believe, or that I like atheists or agnostics for simply agreeing with me. What I care most about is being decent to other people, not what identity one may have.

            • froufoxOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I don’t know how modern progressive religious communities address these very important mental health and lack of self-love issues, but i grew up in a conservative one, and even there i remember reading or hearing interpretation of a phrase “love your neighbor as yourself” as you should love yourself as well—and if you don’t, you would not be able to love others. I’m sure that what you’ve said has a place to be, but community and people around play higher role than abstract beliefs imo

              • TotallynotJessicaM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 hours ago

                It’s not necessarily a higher role, just a different one. It honestly pays a bigger role for less conservative Christians, as they need to wrestle something of value from the social control and authoritarianism of conservative understandings.

                • froufoxOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Yeah, true, wiith a remark that Christianity was not an institution in the very beginning. There were self-organized rebellious group of people without strict hierarchy. Then as it became more popular, tyrants turned it on their side to support existing world order. A classic story

    • FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was sitting here wondering where he stores them and what occasion he’s saving them for. But I’m willing to subscribe to a new religion if I can be saved by a catboy

      • glitchdx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Might i suggest my religion of Awesomism, in which the messiah is a horni non-binary catboy? They tell us the truth that sex is dope as fuck and hating other people for petty reasons is cringe.